Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A poll to help some DU members overcome their confusion on an issue.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:03 PM
Original message
Poll question: A poll to help some DU members overcome their confusion on an issue.
History will blame the Iraq War on:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. there is enough blame to go around. bush couldn't have done it alone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nevermind.
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 06:06 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
Good poll, I should have read the question more carefully. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Both Bush and his enablers. n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Chimp and his cronies are primarily responsible.
But those in Congress who voted for it certainly must share in the blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Everyone who contributed to it.... do you blame the civil war on just one person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nancy Pelosi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. I am reluctant and SAD to say . . .
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 06:11 PM by patrice
Both - Definitely - Both.

They could have stopped him if they had wanted to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. How? Bush didn't need their permission.
Any more than Clinton needed their permission for Kosovo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. You're right. I should have said they could have made more of a unified effort.
I know that's asking them to throw themselves on their "swords" - ALL of the opposition, that is, and it probably would not have stopped King George. So they would have been in a position of creating strong national objections AS the troops were going into Iraq, something they would have been reluctant to do as it might have harmed the troops and it could cost them their jobs, depending upon how they represented their moral decision to their voters. But moral decisions at any level (soldier, senator, citizen, or pResident) should always include a position of personal conscience.

I guess I just don't buy the idea that if they had gotten organized and applied all of their political talent to the case against Invaison of Iraq that it absolutely would NECESSARILY have resulted ONLY in political negatives and, as I said above, I believe the soldiers' conscience and, ergo, behavior on the matter is their own responsibility; if they think something is right, opposition, even from a senator, doesn't change a righteous act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. If you had said the Republicans will blame the Iraq War on:
I would say Hillary Clinton because up until they got their asses handed to them in the 06 Congressional elections Clinton's were to blame for everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nice try to absolve Hillary's participation in Bush's war. It doesn't work.
History, to use your word, shows that she voted for and spoke in favor of the invasion.

I feel sorry for Hillary's supporters when it comes to Iraq as they are forced into creating such false arguments and choices as the one presented in the poll.

Your "poll" wasn't intended to "overcome confusion" as your title said, but to create it.

Your attempt failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You do know that Bush violated the "IWR" don't you? That the neocons wanted this war in the 90s?
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 06:23 PM by MethuenProgressive
Your desperate longing for some pixie dust to twinkle your fantasy into reality is a sad commentary on your ability to participate in a responsible manner in this democracy.


edit an s into an r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. Here's the "pixie dust". Your candidate feels compelled to continue losing.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. silly bamabots...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. nice try to absolve Bush for his crime
History will prove your lie about Hillary speaking in favor of Bush's preemptive invasion false, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. That's what the HillaryHaters want - to let Bush off the hook.
It's crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
37. Nuts. I say. Nuts.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. 77 senators voted to go to war against Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. No, they voted to go to war if Saddam didn't comply with UN resolutions.
That is a big if, one that makes all the difference in the war being illegal or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Point taken
I just think it is silly to blame Hillary for the war. If you blame her, you have to blame 77.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. And one state senator made one small speech at one small rally, and then fell silent
Edited on Sun Mar-02-08 06:27 PM by MethuenProgressive
And that's the Highlight of his "record"? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Both, and all the others who went along.
Naturally Bush deserves the largest helping of blame, but there's plenty leftover for the ones that voted to give that walking pus-filled boil a green light that anyone with more than a quarter of a brain knew he wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Well, Obama did vote *against* pulling our troops out by 2007...
So I suppose he too was just goin' along to get along...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. No argument from me.
But if you think you can tarnish Obama's stance without reminding people of Hillary's vote then I have some beach front property in Missouri to sell you.

In the end he didn't vote for the war, just the funding (something even many Democrats believe was the right thing to do...not me, but I am pretty far left). Hillary voted for the war. This issue won't help you, but you're free to keep trying I guess. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. Where is the option for both?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Nice Edwards pic.
How did he vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Unlike other bush-like politicians, he admitted he made a mistake
She will go down in the books as hand in hand with Mr. Bush on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bush could not have done it without Hillary's and other DINOs' help. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Actually he could've attacked and invaded without approval from Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
25. Ofcourse, GWB but the blind overly patriotic press helped and millions of war
hungry Americans are also to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TSIAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. Nice false choice
Of course, the disastrous policy will be forever linked with Bush/Cheney.

Clinton doesn't deserve singular blame, any more than the other 22 Dems who voted with the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Bush.
That's the only choice. the only *rational* choice, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdpeters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. Why is it that everything Hillary does is always someone else's fault?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
32. Bush, the media and cowardly Democrats who went along.
We don't need one of those cowards in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
33. Dumbass Congress critters like HRC who ...
...gave up what the Constitution mandated they have as powers to a megalomaniac like Bush and who cannot figure out what the fuck went wrong and who are too stupid and too egotistical to admit a HUGE mistake and apologize like hell.

Any other questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
34. So Far There Are 16 People Who Are Really That Dumb? WOW...
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
35. "..bipartisan support for this resolution makes its success in the United Nations more likely,
and therefore, war, less likely". HRC.

Answer: 100% George W. Bush's war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. Both! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC