Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some states will stay blue regardless if it's Clinton or Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:59 AM
Original message
Some states will stay blue regardless if it's Clinton or Obama
There's been some talk here about CA, NJ, & a couple other states turning Republican, but I find that difficult to believe...States like CA, NJ, NY, MA, HI, IL, (and some others) will almost certainly stay blue...

Look at results from Super Tuesday, even in states where Clinton or Obama finished second in the Democratic primary, the SECOND place democrat in some cases had more votes than ALL the Republican candiates....

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/dates/index.html#20080205



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. All states that were Blue last time will stay Blue. Some Red states will turn Blue.
Just enough to do the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent-Voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not if HRC is your nominee. I just don't see her gaining states anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ohio and or Florida is the game.
Either candidate will win at least one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. That's the DLC gameplan.
Make everything hinge on one or two key states.

It's worked so well for us in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Florida and Ohio were key long before the DLC existed.
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 10:29 AM by onehandle
And Governor Dean works 50 states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I actually think
That she would win OH and AR. It would be a skin-of-your-teeth victory, but a victory none the less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Actually, I think Hillary would win Arkansas easily
But if the Democrat can win Iowa, New Mexico, Colorado, Virginia, Nevada (or some combination of these), then we don't need to worry about Ohio & Florida...Though I think Ohio is a good possibility, but Florida I'm less optimistic on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I meant
That the electoral college victory would be "skin-of-your-teeth", not her victory in Arkansas. Adding in AR and OH to the 252 electoral college votes from last time would be a 278-260 victory, which would make basically every state a must win. Clinton could very well carry Arkansas by a comfortable margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. NH wont. Luckily we dont really count though. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Every state counts. Gore lost by something like 4 electorals. The DLC just doesn't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. We can't ignore the "potentially unstable electorate" this year
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 10:08 AM by displacedtexan
Obama vs. McCain And Red-Blue Instability


Obama appears to be headed to the nomination with the support of many of the same voters who backed Bradley in 2000 and Dean in 2004. McCain was also elected with a different base of support than the one that made Bush the Republican nominee in 2000. According to exit polls, Romney always outperformed McCain among Republicans who were either "enthusiastic" or "satisfied" with the Bush administration, while Huckabee cleaned up on the white evangelical / born again vote.

(snip)

If primary voters were willing to choose different sorts of candidates than the ones both parties have recently nominated, this sort of fluidity and uncertainty comes with the territory. It also means that we should take nothing for granted, either or positive or negative, in this election. Assuming he is the nominee, maybe Obama can win Kansas and Virginia, and maybe he can lose Oregon and Massachusetts.


Who knows how this dynamic could change our traditional blue state/ red state understanding.

My biggest fear: Republicans will use this dynamic to cheat. Again. Still.

Hope I'm wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am absolutely positive that MA will go heavily for Obama in November if he's the Dem nominee
Even though it went for Hillary in the primary. I know my bluer-than-blue state very well. They've had it with Republicans (post-Mittens), and will rally around whoever the Dem nominee is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. I'm not absolutely positive, but McCain will find support here that may make MA a swing state. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. if obama believes he can run a 50 state campaign then he's
lost from the start. There is no damn way that utah, wyoming, north dakota, south dakota, nebraska, oklahoma, and some others will turn blue....

Obama might end up like kerry did when it came to Pa.....you all remember that one in 04 right. Kerry was on teh verge of losing Pa. and guess who he asked to come and campaign and endorse him and help him carry Pa.? At the time Kerry was either behind by 2 or tied with bush in pa......The big dawg, Bill Clinton gave his first public appearance after heart surgery to come to philadelphia on 10/25 to endorse....well, a week later Kerry carried Pa..

The following states will be in play for 08....Arkansas....Tenn......Nevada...New Mexico.. West Virgina.....Ohio....Florida.....States HRC can pick up....all she needs is win the blue states Gore did in 2000 and add states with 10 plus electoral votes and there my friends you have the election....On election night all Brian Williams needs to tell us is " We project that Hillary Clinton takes OHIO....or if they say...We project Hillary Clinton to take Florida....there you have the election of the new president Hillary Rodham Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. CA will stay blue
no matter who the Democratic nominee is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC