Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Is Momentum?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:22 PM
Original message
What Is Momentum?
Is the big Mo when you come from behind and win eleven primaries in a row?

Is it taking a state where you trailed by 20 points and bring it even?

Is it losing a 20 point lead to a statistical dead lock?

Is it winning a state that you had a 20 point lead and allowing your opponent to almost catch up to you?

Is momentum shifted when you win a race that you were expected to win, but also break your opponents 11 primary wins?

Help me out here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. mass times velocity
In the political context it is when people begin to accept a growing concensus because they desire to be on the winning side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here is what it looks like:
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 12:27 PM by ProSense





It appears to belong to Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We all know she was ahead by a lot because of name recognition.
That was before the primary process really began.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I will give Hillary supporters this. They are loyal beyond imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Wrong.
Many of us supported other candidates before all the good ones dropped out. Now I simply see it as a choice between style without substance versus substance without style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. style without substance is a Clinton talking point
and I am unimpressed by the DLC substance in Clinton's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. It was a Bush talking point in 1992.
There may not be a lot of substance in HC's campaign, but I am talking about the substance of the individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I don't see any more, or lack of, substance between Hillary and Obama. .....
Hillary stumps that Obama has no substance, but that's all her stump speech is about.

She's so busy pointing out that Obama has no substance that she forgets to talk about her substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I think far to much attention is being paid to what the candidates...
...are talking about and not enough on who they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Doesn't Matter - She's A "Fighter"
That works nights. So what if she's a Bu$hco enabler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. The guys in the Alamo were fighters
didn't work out too well for them, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. But we'll always remember the Alamo, just like I will always remember this primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. She is not a Bushco enabler.
And pointing out the flaws in my candidate doesn't make yours any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. When momentum favors Barack Obama, it is crowd behavior, bandwagon effect
mass delusion, cult, emotionalism, Tulip mania, information cascade, messianic irrationality, and spooky trance.

When the momentum favors Hillary Clinton, it is righteous resistance, thoughtful realization, the general spread of rational examination, scientific sobriety, careful rigor, policy-centered rational decision-making, and general Enlightenment.

Thus sayeth p. 67 of the Clinton Handbook on Definitional Argument. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Amen! brother

Thus sayeth the Clinton's.


:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. either way it's the M$M trying to get the sheeple to stampede
I was hoping it was gonna work in my favor this time, but the M$M seemed to have switched sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaylee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. So true......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. With The Media And Momentum On His Side To The Degree It Has Been, He Should Be Far Ahead By Now.
He's not, and it seems like he's peaked in certain ways. I think that's why it feels like the momentum may be in the beginning of a shift.

With all he had going for him, all the supposed negative tirades against every possible action from Hillary one could muster, all the media support, all the snowballing momentum, I fully expected the polls in both Ohio and Texas to be COMFORTABLY on his side by now. I'm not talking about weeks ago or months ago numbers, I'm talking about recent numbers and trends and where taking the CURRENT situation into consideration, where I would've expected the numbers to be by now. But they're not there, not by a longshot. In fact, there may be signs he's slipping a little, though albeit very little. But still, the fact he hasn't completely closed the deal yet in those states, when based on all he had going for him one would think he absolutely would've by now, is absolutely reason to discuss that the momentum may be shifting a bit.

Tomorrow's gonna be an interesting day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. He's closed the gap by more than 2 points a day. Hillary was expected to win by big margins....
No other candidate has closed the gap that quickly in any election that I can remember without the other candidate committing a major SNAFU.

Hillary has had her gaffes, but hasn't dealt herself the Dean Scream yet. All things considered, Obama has done an excellent job in just catching up. Less than a week ago the Clinton campaign was saying she needed major victories, now they will settle for minor losses.

How much further can she shift the goal posts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. Angular momentum is inherent in spin.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC