Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Defense of Zogby and Talking of SUSA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:16 PM
Original message
In Defense of Zogby and Talking of SUSA
I keep hearing the same thing repeated on this board everyday, but haven't really thought to make a thread on it. It's the idea that SUSA has been right this entire primary season...the "gold standard" as it's being called and that Zogby has been the most wrong. I'm sorry, but that's just not true and I'm one of the biggest poll skepdics on this site (at least vocally I believe).

Super Tuesday, February 5, changed everyone's perception. And yes, Zogby was dead wrong in almost every state...but everyone points to how wrong they got California. I personally think that when thousands of Indie votes aren't counted, that tends to change the results...but that's history now. SUSA on the other hand appeared the most reliable and they've had a damn good track record since Feb.5. Zogby has been nonexistant for a few weeks now and appears to be back. But people never look at pre-Super Tuesday. Back when Zogby was the most accurate and SUSA seemed to be all over the place. It's as if folks have either selective memory, or they're just following the herd on what's being said about SUSA that just isn't accurate.

Polling companies, no matter who they are, will get some right and some wrong. It's just the nature of the profession (outside of maybe ARG which has never been right all primary season). No polling company is ALWAYS right. And that's a common pitfall poll junkies fall into when they put all their eggs and expectations in one basket. People should keep a certain level of skepticism when it involves polls because polls are simply estimates...they're not hard numbers or facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a good point. That's why I like poll aggregators...
like realclearpolitics.com, which sum up all the polls and then find an average, which is likely to be more accurate than any one poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thurston Howell III Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you. Zogby said at one time that primaries are very hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's because state demographics are extremely hard to
accurately poll. Each state is like it's own unique enviroment. Some states are like a crossroads of the different regions of the US. Ohio is a little bit like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. SUSA had Hillary winning Missouri by 13. We consider them the gold standard for CA and CA only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Didn't Zogby specifically point out his error in getting California so wrong?
I'm pretty sure he said his Latin-American turnout model was fatally flawed in that he underestimated it, and overestimated African-American turnout in California.

And he says his models since have been weighted and adjusted.

There was a thread on here a few weeks ago showing that Zogby still has the best polling of the primary cycle... damn, I wish I could find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Zo(m)by Is Garbage, Ergo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well here's to hoping they pull a Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nervous people turn to divination
It's why many people are driven to astrology, numerology, etc. When you're nervous about the future, you want a peek. Modern polls serve a similar purpose. Many of the partisans here, from both camps, are so anxious that they live on the polls. Add in the traditional Democratic fear of anxiety and aversion to conflict, and this relatively genteel contest has become nerve-wracking torture for many people.

I have found that polls are lousy at determining absolute numbers but excellent at detecting trends. Today has been a very nervous day for Team Obama because Hillary picked up a couple of points -- but reversals are bound to happen. Tomorrow night is what counts, but unless Obama pulls off four KOs, Hillary will be proclaimed the winner. And there is still enough primary left to drive this to a dead heat at the convention, and that's the Plan.

It's what the media want -- a dead heat, lots of conflict and anxiety, and a good reason to raise advertising rates as high as possible.

Our pain is their gain.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I agree...I guess I never looked at it that way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Agreed, although Zogby has favored a particular candidate this primary and it's effecting his polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I don't buy that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC