Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HA -Obama in stump speech says if Hillary read the NIE she would have voted against the

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:10 PM
Original message
HA -Obama in stump speech says if Hillary read the NIE she would have voted against the
IWR just like Rockefeller told her to do.

Problem - Rockefeller voted YEA for the IWR.

Nice try!

http://www.adn.com/uspolitics/v-printer/story/333426.html

What happened: Obama ripped Sen. Hillary Clinton on Sunday for failing to read the National Intelligence Estimate before voting in 2002 to authorize the Iraq war. He said she should've followed the lead of Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., contending that he, as the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, did read the report and voted against the war.

"Jay Rockefeller read it, but she didn't read it," Obama told a rally in Westerville, Ohio. "I don't know what all that experience got her, because I have enough experience to know that if you have a National Intelligence Estimate and the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee says, `You should read this, this is why I'm voting against the war,' you should read it."

At the same time, an Obama campaign strategist was on ABC lauding Obama's endorsement from Rockefeller, referring to him as "the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee who opposed the war in Iraq, who read the intelligence before the war."

Why that's out of bounds:

First, former Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., was the chairman of the intelligence committee at the time of the 2002 war vote, not Rockefeller. It was Graham who read the top secret report and voted against the war.

Second, Rockefeller voted FOR the war resolution.

Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let me just say:
no he didn't!

You're wrong!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. This again?
*sigh*

Debunked but thanks for wasting one of yur threads on it.

(Search is your friend)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. OP is either dumb or dishonest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. More unity and hope. I'm so impressed with the new kind of politics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rove, err....Axelrod was spouting this...
nonsense about Rockefeller voting against the IWR too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Obama's lying. Why use Rockefeller's name at all, if not to suggest he voted against IWR?
Obama's clean-up team is saying that BO meant Graham, not Rockefeller, when he referred to the Committee Chairman. But if that is true, why in the heck would Obama mention Rockefeller at all? Especially when Rockefeller voted YES on the IWR.

There is only one feasible answer: Obama screwed up in his statement. He was wrong about Rockefeller's vote, but is too vain to admit it. So his spin team is whirling as fast as it can to keep him looking infallible.

This is a new kind of politician?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC