|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:37 AM Original message |
Too Close to Call: How Today's Primaries Resolve Nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angie_love (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:38 AM Response to Original message |
1. basically we're fucked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Hillary and Obama need to sit-down alone and really talk about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:43 AM Response to Original message |
3. Disagree. If Hillary loses either TX or OH today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I think it could be much more deeply conflicted than that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Nope. that's not enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:15 AM Response to Reply #15 |
25. But that, alas, is spin- unless SOMEONE gives in or cuts a deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:33 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. no, it's not spin. It's pretty much the conventional wisdom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angie_love (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. you really think shes going to listen to party insiders? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:53 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Do you see Obama listening either?-- and that's going to be a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angie_love (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:55 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Why should he drop out? Hes won more pledged delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:02 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Not suggesting either should drop out at this point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:05 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. If Obama were down by 155 pledged delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:12 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. I don't think so, considering his view of the campaign as a kind of 'mission' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:14 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. bad comparison. Jackson didn't have a political career to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. You make my point- time to lock them in a room somewhere! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:26 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. I don't see how I remotely made your point, but in any case, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:55 AM Response to Reply #11 |
31. If he ends up with less delegates that Hillary, I see him listening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:02 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Yes, I think she will listen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:03 AM Response to Reply #7 |
19. Yes, with SDs flocking to Obama and public pressure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:07 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. define flocking!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:17 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Sure, flocking would be the majority of the remaining SDs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:44 AM Response to Original message |
4. If this is decided by the superdelegates, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:50 AM Original message |
I don't buy that argument-- suppose the one with less delegates has more popular votes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:54 AM Response to Original message |
12. You may not buy it, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:58 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. It is a relevant question though when so many delegates are voted on NOT by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:48 AM Response to Original message |
5. A blowout is a 50-50 race, mathematically. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:50 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. But you just came up with a scenario where it happens! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
22. Yes I did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. The converse is true as well: if Obama doesn't get 60+% in all these races he cannot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:02 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. It doesn;t matter though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Florida22ndDistrict (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 07:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
30. He needs 83+ % |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. So, if it is up to them, let's forget the 'voters decide' pageant and get on with it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-04-08 06:52 AM Response to Original message |
9. We divide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC