Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texas, please explain. How can you have...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:34 PM
Original message
Texas, please explain. How can you have...
a primary AND a caucus and divide the vote???

We wonder why people don't trust politics. It's hard enough to figure out Ohio's district rules, but to have a primary and a caucus makes no sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. 2/3 of delegates assigned by the primary, 1/3 by the caucus
Very, very, very strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Washington has a primary and caucus.
It's just that democrats in Washington don't assign delegates based on the primary.

I actually kind of like the way Texas does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I wouldn't mind if WA adopted a system like Texas
This constant battle over having to sign a "loyalty oath" on the ballot is getting old. I wouldn't mind an open primary, closed caucus system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. It's the Sally Field version..
you gotta REALLY REALLY REALLY like your candidate to stand up for them twice in one day :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The Sybil vote?
That's where I thought you were headed when you mentioned Sally Field

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. no... that would some one else, entirely..
SHAME ON YOU SHAME ON YOU.. ENOUGH WITH THE SPEECHES...CLEAN YOUR ROOM.. QUIT PEEING ON THE FLOOR..PULL UP YOUR PANTS,,. DO YOUR HOMEWORK.. OH.. I AM SO PROUD OF YOU..HUG HUG.. SHAME ON YOU..ARE YOU A MUSLIM OR SOMETHING?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. they've been doing it this way for a while...
nothing new...

the explanation would probably actually explain little that makes sense..

"it's the way it is"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I guess it's kinda' 'split the difference'
Maybe it does make some sense...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Same reason there are delegates and superdelegates n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's meant to defuse the advantage of rich candidates with big media buys
Or so the theory goes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. It was awful. I could vote but couldn't caucus.
I just moved here from NY. I was also asked for my driver's license, there were no directions to the polls. I live in a poor, heavily dem area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. It forces boots on the ground, and candidates to pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not sure I know the real reason
I'd assume it might have to do with giving more say to more committed members of the party who are more likely to both caucus and vote in the primary than simply to vote in the primary (of course, the fact that we have open primaries kind of complicates that notion.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's called if you don't like the primary results, you have the caucus to set things right???
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 08:46 PM by demo dutch
Knowing what goes on in politics in TX, it may not be far from the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. The system they have has been in place since 1988.. Bill Clinton apparently liked it in 1992
and again in 1996. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. We like to vote twice in Texas.
This way, it's actually legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Probably to have the advantages of both systems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC