Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why SHOULD hill drop out?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
peanut Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:12 PM
Original message
why SHOULD hill drop out?
This drive by the party and media to make Hillary drop out is
nuts. Here's a pure and simple mathematical fact: Hillary
holds the lead in DEMOCRATIC votes across OUR Democratic
primaries. These ARE the Democratic Party primaries, correct?
Obama's lead in every instance comes from Republican and
Independent crossover voting. One reason the party has created
the "super" delegate structure is to keep
Republicans, Independents and other voters who may possibly --
just possibly -- not have Democratic values and ideals at
heart in their primary voting strategy -- from hijacking OUR
party's nomination choice. Super delegates are NOT all party
fat cats and our own electeds (although when they became the
bad guys, i don't know). Some are long time party activists
who have worked up from the streets and the "ranks"
and i think how they are being played in the media is pretty
shitty too. Actually, do I trust my congresswoman, Kirsten
Gillibrand, to make the best possible decision she can for her
party? Absolutely. That's one reason i voted for her. If I
felt compelled to make her to vote "with her
constituents," she'd probably have to vote for McCain.
(And please, young'uns, don't remind me that McCain is a
Republican, I was actually making a JOKE.)
Hillary has nearly as many as delegates as her opponent, and
neither can prob. enter the convention with the magic number.
That's why sometimes conventions ARE about bartering among
competing views. Many many candidates have gone all the way to
the convention with FAR fewer delegates simply to bring their
weight, and their issues, to the fore and make sure they are
dealt with in the national party platform. This is what the
convention is FOR. The most compelling candidates fight for
support, bring their delegates and their issues to the floor
and the Democratic Party convenes to discuss, vote and take
its campaign forward. Hillary -- love her or hate her -- has
fought for and earned a place as a leading voice in that
convention. As someone who voted in these primaries (whoever I
voted for), I expect her and her delegates to be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RL3AO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Plagerism anyone?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. You caught that, too....
...;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Math is hard!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because she's behind in delegates, total votes, states won
Want more reasons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Being behind does not mean she cannot catch up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:17 PM
Original message
Being behind does not mean she cannot catch up.
It does this late in the primary season.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. look at it this way-if the superdelegates are going to decide this race...
they may choose to follow the "momentem" and if Senator Clinton manages to win more contests than Senator Obama in the next two months than it will seem she has the "momentem" and they will go with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. she needds all th non-committed Super Delegates
and virtually 100% of PA, but OK....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Eh...I still think this will be a brokered convention that forces the
Republicans to keep trying to have to combat TWO candidates that possibly might be the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. There are only 26 Edwards delegates
that is a slim margin for a brokered convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Yes it is a slim margin, and I doubt the delegate count will be that
close.

Besides, if one drops out, the delegates are usually released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. if the delegates are released
then there is no such thing as a brokered convention. One will have 2025 by default
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. In this case it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Let me add that the republicans HAVE their candidate now.
And unless she can reduce Obama's lead to 50 or so it is just giving them more time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. behind in
delegates
primaries
money
donors
caucuses
popular vote
dem senator endorsements
dem govenor endorsemetns

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Democratic party allows for open primaries - you can't change the rules mid-stream (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because she's disgracing herself and the party
And she keeps giving McCain ammunition to use against Obama in the fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nine Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. because it inconveniences Obama
just as she's done by inconsiderately campaigning against him. At least that's the idea I get from DU. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because a fork needs to be inserted
She is DONE...................we are sick of OLD SCHOOL........WAKE THE FUCK UP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. I can't get beyond this: Hillary holds the lead in Democratic votes across our Democratic primaries
What a load of bullshit. If you're going to start off with lies like that, I won't bother reading beyond it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. She shouldn't drop out. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. I have no problem with her staying, as long as she isn't bloodying everything that moves...
This is the problem - Hillary's scorched earth approach is hurting Obama - not enough for her to make a comeback but certainly enough to hurt him when facing McCain.

In retrospect, if this crap causes Obama to lose in the GE, we will all remember this in 2012 when Hillary comes calling again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. Delegates were switching to 0 becasue they believed the MSM propaganda - these
votes show that wa bulloney.

Let's see some switching back now occurring. Watch,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. She can't win, and it will only harm the party
It is near impossible for her to win at this moment, and using negative attacks against Obama will only aid McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. How about:
1. No way to win without seating Michigan in which she was the only one on the ballot
2. Nasty campaign using tactics better suited to Repugs
3. Actually said McCain would be better president than Obama (!!!!!!!!)
4. No way to win without superdelegates overturning popular delegate vote
5. Clinton on ballot energizes Republican base in November

Those are enough for me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Gee - you wouldnt have switched to 0 would you? surprised at you
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 10:38 PM by kelligesq
Flying Squirrel
]
If Obama is the nominess I wont be voting .

McCain is probably less dangerous than "New World Order"
Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Wow.
I'm speechless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Cool - she could President of Democratic Voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. Simple, winning in November is more important than her being the
nominee. The longer she stays in now the more it hurts our chances in November. This isn't rocket science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC