Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Clinton wins Texas, it puts things way close...cuz she won all the big states....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:59 PM
Original message
If Clinton wins Texas, it puts things way close...cuz she won all the big states....
CA, NY, NJ, Ohio, MI, FL, AZ and if Texas (along with the smaller states she's won )...

Only the big state PA is left, if she wins that state....it will be on to the convention, very close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. She isn't going to. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Those "big states" will vote Democrat in the GE anyway
Thats not really a selling point for Hillary continuing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Michigan won't. Florida won't
sorry Charlie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeker30 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. So what you're saying is the red states should pick the nominee
makes perfect sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. That's not the point
It's becoming possible (though not necessarily probable) that Clinton could win more voters while Obama wins the delegates. The party needs to be prepared, because depending on the final vote counts from 2 big states tonight and PA later, it very well could be the nightmoare scenario that the party has feared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Governor of FL stated he'll support a primary redo
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 11:01 PM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. But he didn't say he would PAY for it.
Not to mention that another Primary might not be legal.

A caucus would be legal... and Dean has offered to help pay for that (it's not on the taxpayers dime anyway).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Caucuses are undemocratic . It's too restrictive
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 11:07 PM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Absolutely correct.
and PA is Hillary Country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. it also raises the necessary question
as to why can't Barack Obama -- despite his obvious talent and intelligence as well as overwhelming support -- close the deal? And how might that hurt us in the General?

One thing you can say about Hillary is she knows how to close the deal when the chips are down. Can Barack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. She carrying the DEM base moreso than Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. Well, no, you can't remotely say that about Hillary
She's won all the big Democratic strongholds and is barely staying alive, let alone closing the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Exit polls predict Hillary will win Texas...
Rhode Island -

Male (43%) - 56% Obama, 43% Clinton
Female (57%) - 58% Clinton, 41% Obama

Ohio -

Male (41%) - 52% Obama, 47% Clinton
Female (59%) - 54% Clinton, 45% Obama

Texas -

Male (43%) - 52% Obama, 46% Clinton
Female (57%) - 53% Clinton, 46% Obama

----------------------
Now crunching the numbers ...
If the above exit poll numbers hold ...
Clinton wins RI with 53%
Clinton wins Ohio with 52%
Clinton wins Texas with 52%

Yahooo ... A trifecta for Hillary...
and a cremasteric response for Chris Mathews[/h3

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Exit polls ignore the early voters and the caucus results
So I think your celebration of a trifecta is a bit premature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. 2 out of 3 and counting /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. The delegates are given proportionally so it doesn't matter who wins the states
as a whole.

Time for her to throw in the towel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Popular vote is sill important. You wouldn't want a candidate not winning the pop vote
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 11:04 PM by demo dutch
Not good for the party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Umm changing the rules mid game is not good for the party either
The candidates knew the game they were getting into, and that game was a race for delegates not for a national popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. But again, it lends an air of illegitimacy to the candidate
If the SC had never interfered in 2000, Bush's victory still would have been tainted because he lost the popular vote. People tend to not like that kind of result.


I'm not a supporter of Clinton or Obama, and I'm not asking that any rules be changed. I just hope that the party leaders are ready for the potential blowback if such a scenario really does develop. And given the conduct of our party leaders most of the time, I don't have that much confidence that they are prepared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I guess it depends on how you want to "taint" the election
Do you want to use the delegates, as agreed, or do you want to ignore the rules and go on the popular vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. To say that either side would be happy with such a result
is farcical. Obama's supporters would be just as pissed if he won more votes but Clinton won on delegates. Indeed, I remember quite a few very vocal Obama supporters on DU threatening to leave the party is that very thing happened. I find it highly ironic that the tables could possibly be turned. :shrug:


I understand the rules of the election and that delegates matter. All I'm saying is that the average voter would not be too happy with such a result. Either way.

I doubt it ends up happening, as I think he will handily win the delegates and win enough of the "popular vote" to have a majority. So it's probably a moot point, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. She's only winning TX on Tuesday night
I think Wednesday morning is going to be a different story, especially when we have the caucus results factored in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. If only the "big" states count, then they shouldn't bother with the other states
Seriously, why even have primaries/caucuses anywhere else? Just have a single day, call it Super-Duper-Only-9-States_Count-Tuesday, and be done with it. It sounds ridiculous to me, but that seems to be what the Hillary supporters actually think should happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I've been asking Hillary Clinton supporters this all night
I don't get it. The states that they feel count are the "big states" and the "blue states." Basically they want a replay of the 2004 race, which of course we lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. That's how it was with Gore and Kerry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Why don't we have Closed Primaries where only Democrats can vote?
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 11:10 PM by BeatleBoot
Since it's called a Democratic caucus and primary.

If so, we would have a GE candidate by now.

And her name would be Hillary Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Don't know - ask the powers-that-be
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 11:24 PM by stahbrett
But keep in mind that the campaigning would have been done differently, and it's impossible to know what the result would have been. Would one of the candidates that already dropped out done better? Would Obama have campaigned differently? Would Gore and Kerry had been the nominees in 2000 and 2004? Would Bill Clinton have won the nomination back in 1992? If not, Hillary wouldn't even likely be in this campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. AZ is a "big state"
Oh right, because she won it, it's now a big state.

Psst...as someone who actually lives here, let me give you a dose of reality - it's NOT a big state. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. This side of "big"...AZ has almost 3 million registered voters. (20th)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. Do you think McVain is gonna spin this?
We have down ticket canidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. IL? GA? VA? WA?
All bigger than AZ, last time I checked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC