Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why won't Hillary release her Tax Returns?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:16 AM
Original message
Why won't Hillary release her Tax Returns?
Any of her fans here have a good answer?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. the silence is deafening- keep this kicked, pls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheZug Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good question. Hit her and hit her HARD on this, Barack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. shes gonna release her tax returns on April 15th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. you didn't answer the question- Barack released his early enough in the nominating process
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 07:31 AM by npincus
to allow public scriutiny and MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THE OUTCOME of the process. So WHY is Hillary waiting until the majority of the electorate has already voted? What's the answer?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8443_Page2.html

“All I can tell you is, I’ve released my income tax return because I think it is appropriate, if you’re running for the highest office in the land, for people to have a sense of how you make your money,” he said.

“Now, I think it’s up to Sen. Clinton and President Clinton to determine whether or not they want to follow my lead on that. … It’s not a question of what I want to know — I think it’s what the American people deserve to know, which is just how, in fact, are people’s finances handled.”

Obama called the release of financial records “a long-standing tradition in presidential politics — it’s like releasing your medical records. It’s part of the information that people make an assessment in terms of how you are going to perform as president.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. Her 2007 return? What is she HIDING on her 2006 return?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #21
41. What is she hiding? Bill's income...
Bill Clinton has gotten rich. Very rich. And she doesn't want anyone to know how he got so rich. One clue may be those photos of him with his adopted father. Always smiling. Thinking about all the cash rolling in.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Because A) she's not the nominee yet and B) We're over a month from filing time
It's not rocket surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Um, this is about her 2006 returns
Try to keep up, rocket surgeon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. LOL... HRC apologists, all.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 07:34 AM by npincus
They'll crow about Rezko till they're blue in the face, but they won't smell the stink in their own backyard.

Still waiting for an answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I don't know about you, but I can grab my last year's tax return
from the file in less than a minute. Give me another 5 minutes to make a copy for you. They don't want us to know about something - I'm still betting on Burkle and the little building in the Cayman Islands. She's holding back the First Lady papers, too. I imagine, when the truth comes out her only foreign policy experience during those years was wrapping a Lalique vase to haul off to Chappequa, it might affect the race. Oh . . . wait . . . the race will be over. Hill's 35 years of experience: Wellesley, President of the Young Republicans; corporate lawyer; wife of a Governor of a small, southern state; First Lady (decorates Christmas trees, plans state dinners, selects china patterns, fails at sole policy task); Senator (props - makes a good senator).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. me too...she's dodging...nows the time to hit her hard on this..she wants to lead
then put those tax returns out there..Hullary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm sure it's because those tax returns will reveal a huge scandal,
like that she has made most of her income from profits on the child pornography films that she's been financing. We would already know about this, but the IRS is not allowed to discuss it of course, and the only reason she hasn't been prosecuted is because of the obscure "ex-president's wife" waiver. She can get away with practically anything and we can't touch her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. Because she doesn't have to yet. And she won't be bullied into
it by Baraki wan Obami.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. that's a LAUGH... and why aren't you interested?
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 07:49 AM by npincus
Shouldn't you be? If a Repuke candidate had the same position, what would you be saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. I'll know soon enough. You're just pissed cuz barrie got caught
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 08:58 AM by acmavm
with his hands in Rezko's cookie jar.

edit: The entire repukican party had their head up the Clinton's asses and couldn't find anything indictable. And they TRIED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. You'll "know soon enough" about her 2006 Tax Return? BO released his already
when it MATTERS in the nominating process. You aren't the least bit curious? I'd smell a stink if Obama refused to release last year's return.

Bullshit about Rezko... you want to get into dirty donors? how much did Denise Rich pay for Marc Rich's presidental pardon? That's part of Hillary's 35 year resume, you know. I don't think the HRC campaign wants to have that conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. No, that's BILL. How much money did Michelle make off of
Walmart (even tho barrie had the guts to call Hillary on her Walmart association). No, its not bullshit about Rezko. Not at all. Or Donnie McWhatever, the homophobe preacher. Or any of his little antics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Oh sure, HRC trumpets her hands-on experience/involvement in the Clinton Admin
- she's running on her experience. Well, HRC can't have it both ways; if she wants to own her role in the clinton Admin, she can't cherry-pick only the flattering moments. She owns it.

As for Michelle Obama, you may find her resume distateful but there is nothing criminal there as you seem to imply, likewise w/Rezko. You need to hold your own candidate to the standard you've set for Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. MY friggin' candidate was John Edwards. The only fucking dem
in the bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #34
45. Edwards said his Tax Returns would remain "private"
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 10:56 AM by npincus
if I remember correctly. So much for transparency in government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
59. NOTHING, I say again NOTHING, illegal regarding Rezco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
24. 2006, she has..if she hasn't filed them..she's really hiding something..try another angle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
36. HRC has NOT released her 2006 Tax Return- she WILL NOT
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 10:03 AM by npincus
"until April 15". Right. She's waiting until the nominating process is over (or so she thought it would be). Watch her backtrack on her promise... the bullshit will fly thick and fast.

Don't Hillary's fans smell a stink there? She knows it's hard to attack Obama for taking campaign donations from Rezko once the cast of characters making doinations to the Clinton library is disclosed... among other things.


http://www.examiner.com/a-1224714~Pressure%20builds%20on%20Clinton%20to%20release%20tax%20returns.html

Washington DC (Map, News) - A week after Barack Obama challenged Hillary Clinton to release her 2006 income-tax returns, she is coming under increasing pressure to make the document public. The New York Times, the country's most powerful liberal voice, said in an editorial Friday that the public was entitled to details of the $5 million loan to her own campaign, as well as her husband's murky business dealings.

"Release of the tax returns should not be made conditional on winning the nomination, as Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton has made it," argued the Times, which has endorsed Clinton for the Democratic nomination.

The Times also called on the Republican presumptive nominee John McCain, who was also endorsed by the newspaper, to release his 2006 tax returns.

Both McCain and Clinton have promised to make the information available after the nomination process is over.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
37. WHHHAAAAAAAAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. lol...it was Obama the Hildabots would be screaming...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. I am an Edwardsite. So your Hildabot shit is falling on deaf ears.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 10:08 AM by acmavm
I just love how this is turning out though. All the arrogance of the past two weeks blown to shit in one night.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #42
67. Be for Edwards...that should serve you well...how's it going for ya..f off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. If she's in it for the long haul sounds like its time to see
where all this crazy money is coming from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angela Shelley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. OUCH! ... a slap in the face for every taxpayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. Because We'll See How Much Bill's Been Paid By His "Charity"
That's my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. I believe she's already said that they're not together yet, but will be by April 15th. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. her 2006 Tax Return... where is it hiding?
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 10:06 AM by npincus
SO much for transparency in government (and honest government).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #16
48. 2006, not 2007
I wouldn't ask her to disclose her tax return for 2007; I haven't even submitted mine yet. Her 2006 return, however, would be worth seeing, and I think we deserve that. If she's making the ridiculous "vetted" claim, how about letting us actually vet her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. Why do you think?
"I'll release them when I'm the nominee". Don't the citizens of NY State who elected her as their Senator deserve to see them and see the kind of financial sweetheart deals she and Bill are involved in now? Futuregate anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. c'mon Hil - xerox us a copy
where are your tax returns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. K&R
I am still hopeful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
25. Always Hear Crickets on This One. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
29. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
31. Obama's 2006 Tax Return is online. WHERE is Hillary's?
Obama's 2006 Tax Return here: http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/files/obama_2006_tax_return.pdf

Why doesn't Obama challenge her to post hers online?

I want to start a new thread and post a screen shot, but I've maxed out my 24-hour allowance.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
32. Probably because she's as rich as John Edwards.
Like any sane person, she's cashed in on her notoriety with book deals & speaking fees. That's capitalism and it's perfectly okay. I just wish she could be more open & honest about it. I wouldn't resent her for making a boatload of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
35. She Will Release
her returns at the appropriate time - as any good Commander In Chief would. Don't worry!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. perfect timing! So the nomination process goes forward without transparency
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 10:50 AM by npincus
and the People are the last to know who the CLinton Library donors are and where their wealth is coming from, for potential conflict of iterest matters. So you think she's been "vetted"? Wait until McCain gets his hand on her Returns IF (a big "if") she is our Nominee.

Your attitude is certainly very B*shian, very anti-Democratic, and insulting to the intelligence of the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #43
51. So you Think
Obama is transparent? I'd say he has quite a few questions to be answered, and it's his lack of transparency and ability to stand up to the heat that will keep him out of the White House. Hillary will do the right thing. My attitude is right on!!!!

Hillary for President!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Here is Obama's 2006 Tax Return (link):
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 12:19 PM by npincus
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/files/obama_2006_tax_return.pdf

Let me know if you find anything unseemly or even criminal.

Now, can you offer a link to Hillary's 2006 Tax Return? I guess not, since she's holding on to them until the nomination process is over. So, the question is what is she hiding? You only have faith, you don't have material fact-- which Obama has been forthcoming about. He has nothing to hide, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #43
64. It's no one's business UNLESS she's the nominee.
Keep on whining though. It's so becoming.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. Ridiculous.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 03:59 PM by npincus
Candidates have been releasing their tax returns since the Watergate era- except for THIS cycle. The president works for US, we are hiring him/her and have every right to know if that person has benefited financially or has a financial relationship with a person/corporate entity that may influence his/her judgment and which may not serve our best interest. It makes no sense to time release AFTER the nomination, after it's too late for any potential conflict-of-interest discovery to change the result.

As for "whining', that's a handy response to something you don't want to hear. The most whining I've heard these days is coming from Hillary's mouth about her ill treatment by the MSM. I beg to differ; had any other candidate other than clinton lost 11 consecutive primaries they would have been written off. Hillary never was. The MSM loves the narrative of this election and will do everything it can to keep it going.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #64
78. LOL- it looks like HRC was whining about seeing rick Lazio's tax returns in 2000!
Very becoming of HRC! :rofl:


http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C06EFD61E31F93AA1575BC0A9669C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1

Mr. Lazio pledged to release his tax returns soon after entering the Senate race in May, but had not done so, raising suspicions about whether he had the kind of financial problems that have tripped up other politicians in New York in recent decades.

<snip>

The campaign of his Democratic opponent, Hillary Rodham Clinton, criticized the delay, asking whether he was hiding something. The State Democratic Party even sent a young campaign worker dressed as Uncle Sam to Mr. Lazio's campaign events, to shout at him to disclose the returns.

Mr. Lazio's aides said the wait stemmed from their need to review the returns. ''We said we would release them by the end of the summer, and we did,'' said Dan McLagan, a spokesman for the Lazio campaign. ''The only story here is Mrs. Clinton's desperation in basing so much of her campaign in attacking Rick on this issue. It shows the lack of seriousness on her part, and I think calls her credibility into question.''

Though the Lazio campaign said it wanted to clear up the mystery, it did not exactly put the returns on the Internet. Yesterday, reporters (but not the public) were allowed to view (but not photocopy) the returns at Lazio campaign headquarters near Grand Central Terminal.

The reporters got as much time as they wanted and were permitted to take notes, but the returns could not leave the room. Asked about such restrictions, Mr. McLagan said other politicians, like Gov. George E. Pataki, had used the same system. Many, including President and Mrs. Clinton, distribute copies.

The Lazio campaign did not provide originals of the returns, and they did not include the dates they were filed. Aides said Mr. Lazio has always filed on time and had never sought extensions or filed amended returns. He used an accountant, except in 1990, when it appears he did his return himself.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadian_is_cold Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
39. I am more interested in why she won't release her White House records
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
40. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
44. A question they keep dodging whilst slinging dirt about other topics....
...WHAT IS SHE HIDING?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Hillary's living in a glass house
now the question is, will Obama start throwing rocks at it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
47. Because she and Bill are getting millions from Saudi Arabia and India
which is barely being disguised as a "charitable foundation"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
49. She can be put away on this alone come Nov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. so much for being "vetted"
it makes me feel like she & McCain struck a deal-- not to release their returns through the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
53. recomended n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
54. THE $5 MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION - Who has FUNDED her campaign?
What is she hiding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
55. I would like to see Bills library donor list.
Bribes do not have to be paid beforehand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
56. *BREAKING** Obama Campaign Releases this Memo:
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/03/obama_campaign_strikes.php

Go, Obama!

TO: Interested Parties

FR: The Obama Campaign

RE: TAX RETURNS: What does Clinton have to hide?

DA: March 5, 2008


The Clinton campaign today maintained that “the vetting of Barack Obama has just begun.” The truth is, more than a year into this campaign, some very simple vetting of Hillary Clinton has yet to start.


In the face of her unwillingness to release her tax returns, Hillary Clinton has made the false case in this campaign that she is more electable because she has been fully vetted. When it comes to her personal finances, Senator Clinton’s refusal to release her taxes returns denies the media and the American people the opportunity to even begin that process. Though her campaign has tried to kick the issue down the road, Democratic voters deserve to know, right now, why it is she is hiding the information in her tax returns from last year.


The Clinton campaign has said that they have released copious amounts of financial information but there are many questions about their private dealings that could be answered in their tax returns but not in the information that is currently available. For example, here are eight pieces of information that could be learned from her tax returns, the accompanying schedules, and attachments:


* Effective tax rate – including whether or not any tax shelters were used to reduce it
* Amount of income for spouses by source
* Amount of stock gains and losses
* Gross income for the couple
* Amount earned from stock dividends
* Amount of household employment taxes paid
* Personal exemptions taken
* Charitable contributions made


Senator Clinton has also claimed that she is too “busy” to release her tax returns. Given the fact she is able to loan her campaign $5 million, you would think the Clintons would be able to hire an accountant. The reality is that she wants to keep this information hidden from voters. The people of Wyoming, Mississippi, Pennsylvania and the rest of the country should wonder why.


more at link above....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #56
63. OOOOOH. That's deadly!
It's none of his fucking business what her finances are. She'll release them when she's the nominee.

WHINE ON, OBAMOIDS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #63
69. BS on Hillbot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #63
70. see post #68
I am sure your standards and judgement would change had HRC been the one to disclose her tax return and Obama the one to hide it from the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #56
79. Excellent. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
57. Because she's gotten away with concealing them...
...and obviously has something to hide.

Oh, I doubt that there's a huge scandal lying in wait. She may be covering up nothing more than an embarrassment of riches. At some point, I assume, keeping the secret may be more politically expensive than releasing the returns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. McCain won't release his either... something tells me the 2 of them
made an "arrangement" not to go there if they were the nominees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
58. She's too busy slinging mud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
61. She thinks it'll be damaging.
I'm curious what the issue might be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
62. Why should she? It's not required by law and why
the hell would she want the fucking repukes scouring over her finaces if she's NOT the nominee? That would be INSANE. She's right to not release them. It's no one's damn business at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chyjo Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. Voters in the Democratic primaries
have five million good reasons to look at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #65
72. It's none of their business unless she's the CANDIDATE. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeking Serenity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #72
75. She already is a CANDIDATE. She is not (yet) the NOMINEE.
Why are voters in Democratic primaries any less important or less entitled to know about whom they are choosing between than the general election voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
66. Good ? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
71. ha ha--you folks are D-E-S-P-E-R-A-T-E --all chatting amongst yourselfs~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. Desperate? The math doesn't add up for Hillary
so don't plan your victory party just yet. And an Obama net gain for TX caucuses is likley, which means the TX vicotry is split between the 2.

Unlike Hillary, he's run a decent, respectful campaign. Hopefully he's learned theat being decent doen't work when someone's throwing "the kitchen sink" at you. Go, Obama.

And Hillary, since all presidential candidates have provided thier federal tax returns since the Watergate era, just why are you hiding yours until the nomination process is over?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
74. morning self-kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
76. because she's a woman-
?

We don't have to play fair.

:shrug:

makes as much sense as any of the answers so far-


Good question Npincus- the answers leave more than a little to be desired.

peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeking Serenity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #76
77. Maybe she could claim that since Bill is likely listed as the primary taxpayer
and she's just the "spouse" (assuming they file jointly), that they're really Bill's tax returns and he's not running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC