Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It Looks Like Obama-Clinton?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:28 AM
Original message
It Looks Like Obama-Clinton?
I don't see how she narrows the gap against Obama enough to win the nomination without heavily relying on the super delegates... This would leave half the party feeling jobbed and that's not a good place to be...

Conversely, I don't see how she's denied a place on the ticket after building a strong and durable coalition of Latino voters, Asian voters,working class voters , female voters , and older voters...If she's denied a place on the ticket this would leave half the party feeling jobbed and that's not a good place to be...

Do they like other? Probably not but they can learn to...

There's not much I agree with Chris Matthews on but he was correct when he said the Kennedy-Johnson model is the model for Obama-Clinton... Robert Kennedy despised Lyndon Johnson... I don't think John Kennedy did though...He was a pragmatist...Kennedy put Johnson on the ticket despite his surrogate, John Connally saying that Kennedy had Addison's Disease and needed steroids just to stay alive...He alo made John Connally Secretary Of The Navy ...

Is it the most balanced ticket? No...But a coalition of Latinos, African Americans, working class whites, Jews, older people, and females is a nice coalition to have..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. So super delegates shouldn't have a right to vote?
Looks like a Clinton/Obama ticket to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. He has the delegate lead, and 50 more SDs in his pocket.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 09:32 AM by Kittycat
She has no chance.

All she is campaigning for now is to destroy Obama, and increase her chances for 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Baloney, super delegates can and will switch AGAIN. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. They won't switch again. It's political suicide. Flip Flopping back and forth won't win you .....
any favors. All it does is polarize you from both candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Let's Be Fair
Hillary will have nearly half the votes and half the delegates and wins in populous states like CA, Fl, OH, TX, FL, PA and MI...

This didn't go as planned but she earned a place on the ticket...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. They Should But If Folks Think They Were Jobbed That's Not A Good Place To Be
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 09:33 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:43 AM
Original message
They can go to the polls like the rest of us.
There is no such thing as a super citizen, to pretend other wise is to pretend the emperor has no clothes. But many of us are happy to do that, bow to the feet of America's royal families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not if he wants to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. How Does He Win By Telling Half The Party To Fuck Off And Die?
Pardon my French...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. how does she win by doing the same thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. I Addressed That In My Seminal Post And Conceded She Couldn't
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
29. You're right. That wouldn't be good and, honestly, I don't think either one of them would want to
hurt so many people. I believe that they both truly want what is best for the party and for this country. I hope they can work this out. I'd be happy with Obama as a VP because then he could, theoretically, be in the WH for 16 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. I for myself think it would be a great ticket
Then they should go back and put some of the other great candidates on as cabinet members and say to the American people, this is the TEAM you will be voting for in November.
The team that will work for the American people to restore democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. I like that idea
they should go ahead and ANNOUNCE that that Edwards will be Attorney general, Clark Secretary of Defense. SO on... and put it all on the table, right in their faces... "THIS IS THE DREAM TIME... come and get it!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton/Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. I agree....and mostly due to age. The younger being the incumbent could give us 16 &
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 09:45 AM by Alamom

possibly more years of a Democratic Government......which our country needs desperately.




edit to add


I also agee with "liberal N proud". Set up the greatest cabinet ever seen in the history of this country.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StrongBad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. Plus 8 years of being VP would shatter Obama's "experience" liability
Which is pretty much the only thing people are able to throw up against him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
36. Clinton floating the idea of sharing the ticket is just more disingenuous nonsense from her.
The only reason she's talking about that is to try and deflate Obama's support. It will never happen. She is way behind in the pledged delegate count and yesterday didn't change that, except that now she has even fewer states in which to pick up delegates. It's not her place to be saying who is or is not on the ticket.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. Latinos wont be a problem with Obama/Richardson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermit77 Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. I like an Obama/Richardson ticket
And Richardson's comments of late have been very favorable to Obama. Also Richardson didn't endorse anyone even though Bill Clinton put heavy pressure on him and was even yelling at him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. How Does The Man Who Was Clowned In The Primaries Get A Spot On The Ticket
And the person who garnered nealr half the vote get a golden watch and a thank you for your time?


Plus Latinos are but a part of Hillary's constituency....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I think Hillary will depress Indie support for Obama on an Obama/Clinton ticket
I think most of the dems will come home and I think in th end she would hurt more than help. Besides that, I can never imagine it happening in a million years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. I could live with that.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 09:40 AM by jefferson_dem
We might have to walk through those gates of hell in order to unite the party. I see that as an option ONLY if they get together soon ... before this thing gets even more nasty, beyond repair.

EDIT: Only acceptable with Obama at the top, given how he will go to the convention with more pledged delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. Random comment Because I dont have a thread left
I'll ask one thing if Hillary is the nominee. Get rid of Howard Wolfson. I despise him, and I think I may dislike him more than McSleazy, Mark Penn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. I Don't Mind Wolfson Because He's Sincere In His Devotion To Hillary
I despise Penn because I think he's mercenary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
16. As an Obama supporter - If I was forced to have both of them on one ticket,
I would not want Clinton in the VP slot. She wouldnt take it anyway. I'll take 16 years of Obama vs 16 years of Clinton any day. Plus, Clinton sucks the life out of an Obama ticket... whereas he brings life to a Clinton ticket.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
19. The "Dream Ticket".......Repukes can only fight one not both...
thats my take on why they want ot influence our primaries. Democrats are pulling out record numbers of voters on a scale of almost 3-1. It appears Repukes are more interested in staying home. As much as people carp about the differences beteen Hillary & Obama, the more that is the same. If that wasn't true this would have been settled already. I'm ready to win and if winning means a "Union Ticket" we are winning. Can you spell Landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
20. I'm not her biggest fan, but I could live with it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
22. I keep saying it. Obama needs a national security VP. Hillary isn't it.
Clark or Webb are best. They are running against the only nationally recognized Republican who isn't a chickenhawk...the last thing they should do is nominate two people who never served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
26. It just might
What Obama appears to have lost last night is his ability to dictate the terms of victory; Hillary is here to stay. Absent a collapse from Clinton and an Obama win in Pennsylvania, or, conversely, an Obama fold and a loss in a place like Oregon or North Carolina, the contours of this race are clear. These candidates can be expected to hold serve until the convention, and, in the process, they could reduce each other to bloody stumps. There are some difficulties with this pairing (and most of mine have to do with Bill's ability to stay out of the way), but these two do compliment each other on many levels. It could work.

As an aside, it's generous of you, as a Clinton supporter, to advance this notion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. I Can Play This Out
Barring any unforseen circumstances Hillary will win WV, KY, PR, and PA...She probably will win IN but I am not as confident of IN as the others...

She will end up with nearly half the pop vote and delegates...Obama will end up with a tiny, tiny bit more than half the delegates and pop vote...

Neither side can afford to alienate the other group's followers because there are just so many of them...

This race reminds me of 1980 except Ted Kennedy was about four hundred delegates behind and didn't have nearly as broad a coalition... But his followers were devoted because of the Kennedy brand name as are Clinton's followers...1984 was closer but I don't know anybody who was willing to go to the ramparts for Gary Hart...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Could she accept this as a compromise?
I have my doubts.

There's a lot of logic to work this out sooner than later; seven weeks to Pennsylvania is an eternity. There's not much more that can be said by either of these candidates that is new, except for attacks. That only helps the other side, ultimately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. She Will Be Sixty Eight In 2016
That's young by today's standards...There's bit of residue sexism in our society so a sixty eight year old woman is seen as "older" than a sixty eight year old man but that's life...

I think she would take it... It would assuage her ego...It beats losing...

Even if this is settled in June they still have five months to get things right...

And I do think Hillary is a great liaison to females, especially the very youngest and oldest female voters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. DSB is right, Obama/Clinton is the only thing that makes sense at this point.
As much as I think Clinton really went places she shouldn't have in this process, I'm willing to forgive her as long as she ejects her asshat crew (Penn et. al) and brings along Wes Clark.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
workinclasszero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
30. I could live with Obama / Clinton if he could.
But not the other way around which is what Hillary has in mind no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
31. This morning, Obama does look like the underdog...
regardless of his slim lead in delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Frankly in this primary.. that is by FAR the safest place to be...
And I think Obama knows that. Hide under the guise of defeat, retool.. and keep on plugging. Most people don't really know about the "math" problem that Hillary has and that he is going to be tough to beat, and that might be for the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. I agree.
He has a long-term strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
32. I honestly don't think HILLARY will agree to it!
She has run this campaign as the nominee the entire time. She never really thought for a second that she'd be campaigning for a VP spot, and I don't really think it's a spot she wants. She & Bill want to be the two running the white house, and Obama would have no hesitation in running things his way.

I think Clinton would rather not be anything at all then have to "work for" Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
39. Other way around. Clinton/Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
40. I'm totally down with Obama/Clinton!
I'll work my butt off for them out here in swinging Ohio....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
42. Make that ticket Clinton/Obama
and I can hold half my nose and vote for it. I'd far prefer Clinton/Clark.

I think we all need to remember that the DU echo chamber is not the real voting world. Last night at my Texas precinct convention--which went entirely for Hillary--the voters' big concern was electability. They don't think Obama has a prayer against McCain. They think Hillary can hand him his head and turn Texas blue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
43. Clinton/Obama, and she agrees to serve only one term. Obama 2012.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 11:19 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Were I an arbitrator, that's about where I'd be.

The VP slot has vastly more utility for Obama than Clinton. In 2012 he would only be 49 years old!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. A) Hillary would never promise that B) Hillary wouldn't keep that promise if she DID

If you think she would, you have learned nothing about the Clintons and their thirst for power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC