Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Obama will fight first next time, instead of just fighting back.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:23 AM
Original message
How Obama will fight first next time, instead of just fighting back.
1. Hillary's toughness will become "ACTING tough" and "making political calculations," in contrast to actual courage and doing what's right. This will begin with her decision to marry Bill Clinton and ride him for all she could, even after he had numerous affairs, continue through her IWR vote, etc.
2. Voters will be asked what presidential image of America they want to present to the world after Bush.
3. Hillary's caving on numerous votes on republican legislation will be trumpeted as evidence she can't even stand up to George Bush, much less any (other) enemy of the state. You will hear about clinton-bush views of the world. You'll see the two-shots of them laughing together.
4. Here come the scandals: the tax records, the logs of Hillary's years at the White House, the campaign money, and here come the scandals redux (the golden oldies from the nineties). It ain't pretty, but the most successful game strategy ever is, unfortunately, TIT FOR TAT.
5. The health care argument refined: she failed on it last time, what makes you think she can pass it this time?
6. The victim thing, turned: what will the world think of a president who complains about being treated unfairly...and how can that sort of mindset protect American interests?
7. The McCain comparison, turned: who would Americans choose between McCain and McCain-lite? Democrats had better put up an actual choice in November.
8. Clinton will no longer be allowed to pine thoughtfully for our troops in battle or returning home wounded or dead, without it being clear that she and Bush put them in harm's way in the first place and did so recklessly.
9. You'll hear how Barack was the only senator to help fund-raise to stop the Dakota anti-abortion ban and you'll be asked why.
10. and so on. It won't be pretty or necessarily fair, but unfortunately we just learned how effective negative campaigning is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Basicaly he needs to ask: When has she ever fought for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hate it that HC is using her husband's experience as her own. BO should point to that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He should show her face along with the likes of Laura Bush and Mrs. Johnson
And ask, "Does being First lady count as executive experience?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thank God - Obama finally starts chipping at that "experience"
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/Obama_says_it_is_premature_to_talk_about_a_joint_ticket.html

"I hope people start asking is what exactly is this foreign experience she is claiming," he said. "Was she handling crises during this period of time? I haven’t seen any evidence that she is more equipped to handle a crisis.

"She made the experience argument and her ability to handle a crisis, so I think it is important to examine that claim and not just allow her to assert it," he added. "She has made the argument that she is thoroughly vetted. If the suggestion is somehow that on issue of ethics or disclosure or transparency that she is somehow going to have a better record than I have or could (better) withstand Republican attack, then that should be tested."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sound eminently fair. Obama needs to open up on her.
Something he should have been doing all February instead of measuring the drapes in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama needs to show he is tough and can give as much as he takes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC