Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's spending advantage was blown away by Clinton's use of free media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:55 PM
Original message
Obama's spending advantage was blown away by Clinton's use of free media
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 02:56 PM by BeyondGeography
Attack ads that re-ran on all the channels.

The turban photo.

SNL and Comedy Central appearances.

The "shame on you" episode.

Milking NAFTAgate for all it was worth, etc.

The Obama campaign's media strategy in the face of all that was, what, exactly? HRC has often been guilty of political malpractice in this campaign; in the period between Feb. 19 and March 4, that title goes to Obama, even if I find much of what Clinton did to be vile. She's in it to win it, after all. You can't be passive in the face of a principle-free competitor who is throwing the kitchen sink at you.

Good to see they have absorbed the lesson by creating some free media play of their own today by pushing for Clinton's tax returns. I hope this is part of a larger strategy that they stick to through April 22. Better surrogates would help, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I totally agree, however. Winning Texas and Ohio were not in Axelsrod's game plan, IIRC.
Yes, it's time to scrutinize Hillary now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. All last weekend the MSM kept saying, What Hil has to do to win?
It was like they were prompting the people of what they had to do to make her win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. and there's more where that came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. wasn't the SNL endorsement GIVEN to her?
Didn't CBS do a puff piece profile of her, while they did a positive (with questions) profile of Obama? That was given to her as well.

Also NAFTAgate was created - by a Conservative in Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleowheels Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wholeheartedly agree with you. Starting Friday with the 3 a.m. ad...
and then with Hillary's SNL (ad) appearence, the fake NAFTA memo and hounding of Obama regarding Rezko, Hillary's campaign couldn't have asked for better advertising. But the truth is, her campaign did infact ask for this. Everyday, her advisors Penn, Ickes and Wolfson have a conference call where they don't just suggest reporters to follow their lines of attack, they tell the reporters what to write. Remember when reporters and journalists actually wrote their own stories? Now, they are just a bunch of lazy hacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nope. His money advantage was huge and it made a difference. Money is the only reason
he's ahead. Barack isn't winning this contest, he's buying it.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. The entire slate of cable news channels became an arm of the Clinton campaign last week
There was no escaping the non-stop pro-Hillary 24 hours per day coverage.

It was so over the top it became a shameful display of corporate bias that was only done to interefere with our nomination process in order to keep the process dragging out for at least another 7 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Campaign finance reform is mute when you have free media
cheer-leading.

I'm surprised he did as well as he did. The barrage was relentless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC