Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canada: Telling Americans we have no right to know. Obama: Lesson 1, No Cheney Style meetings.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:06 PM
Original message
Canada: Telling Americans we have no right to know. Obama: Lesson 1, No Cheney Style meetings.
Since when does anyone, especially another countries government, get off telling the American people we have no right to know what goes on in behind closed door meetings about OUR economy?

Since when is it okay to claim it's a candidates right to hold private, closed door meetings with anybody, especially another countries government, over OUR economy?

Since when is it a 'leak' for the press to investigate and inform the people of such meetings taking place, and what was said and done?

Since when is it okay for a candidate to run on a 'change' platform of ending back room politics and behind closed door meetings, like Cheney's energy party, while having back room, closed door meetings, especially with another countries government?

Since when is it okay for a campaign to engage in this type of behavior and refuse to be forthcoming about it when questioned?


IT IS OUR RIGHT TO KNOW.

Canada and the Obama campaign, Goolsbee, should be apologizing to US, rather than putting on this sideshow for their mutual benefit.

Apologies to Obama?

Apologize to us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Clinton campaign was first to contact Canada about NAFTA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not claiming privacy. Not to say one thing publicly and another privately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Obama's advisor didn't do that. That's been debunked. Sorry, no ammo here.
In fact, it was HILLARY that initiated a meeting to reassure Canada that she didn't mean what she said about NAFTA--OOOOOPS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. Fact is--both Canada and Obama were in FULL damage control yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. actually
that is not what is says. Someone overheard someone else mention the Clinton Campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Please tell us the SECRET SOURCE
that names Hillary as calling Canada. And we want names, evidence of proof, LOL. At least we have the Obama memo's. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. yes, Obama owes Americans an apology for making deals behind our backs
and worst of all:

lying and denying that ANY meeting had ever taken place between Goolsbee and Canada

then, when confronted with the bald facts, Obama said "first time he was aware of it"

give me a break
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think it is another example of his inexperience that causes poor knee jerk response
like what he said in the debate about his involvement with Rezko, which is now biting him in the ass.

It was a very "Kenny Boy" Who? moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Can you find me the quote where Obama said that Goulsbee DIDN'T
meet with a Chicago Canadian Consulate official? Because I thought his campaign denied that a meeting took place in Washington at the Canadian embassy with some (unnamed) advisor initiating a NAFTA discussion--that was the initial details of the story. Different meetings, one which didn't even happen. The story didn't get straightened out until a few days later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Oh yes, it's all so complicated. His campaign flat out denied meeting with them period.
Durbin denied it on TV.

Obama is responsible for his campaign responses, no matter who gives them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Find me a quote that specifies that once the media fingered Goulsbee
as the adviser in question, that Obama or his campaign denied that Goulsbee--specifically-- ever met with Canadians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Durbin flatly denied it on TV Monday. It's Goolsbee, though I like Ghoulsbee.
he represented Obama's campaign about it.

There were other released statements from the campaign that claimed Goolsbee wasn't meeting with them as a representative of Obama, but as a UofC Econ Professor. It was ludicrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. Denied that a meeting took place, or denied the substance or purpose
of the meeting? Because without links and quotes, this becomes an urban legend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Denied that a meeting took place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Well, I guess Durbin was wrong, but then, I don't see a link or a quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
62. Here ya go.

WASHINGTON, March 3 (UPI) -- Austin Goolsbee was not acting in his role as senior adviser to the Illinois senator's campaign when he met with Canadian officials about Obama's stance on the North American Free Trade Agreement, Obama campaign manager David Plouffe said, the Chicago Tribune reported Monday.

The Hill newspaper reported that there is a memo circulating in the Canadian government that says Goolsbee said Canada should consider Obama's remarks against the free trade agreement not as a threat, but as "political positioning."

The newspaper reported Monday that initially the Obama camp denied that the meeting took place. On Sunday, Plouffe said Goolsbee was only speaking to Canadian officials informally as a University of Chicago professor and not as Obama's adviser.

http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2008/03/03/obama_camp_concedes_canada_meeting/5520/


With the Ohio primary looming, Obama has been blasting Hillary Clinton for having supported NAFTA, which many people in Ohio believe has cost the state manufacturing jobs. Clinton, meanwhile, claims Obama has also supported NAFTA in states including Illinois, where it has boosted agricultural exports, while criticizing it in Ohio.

After Canadian television reported last week that Goolsbee met with Canadian officials and reassured them about NAFTA, campaign officials denied it.

“It did not happen,” Obama told a New York television station. “The story was not true.”

http://www.tboblogs.com/index.php/news/story/obama-meeting-wasnt-a-meeting-conversation-wasnt-a-conversation/



They're not hard to find, I'll bet you could even find of Obama saying the meeting didn't happen. I've seen it. Millions of others have too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #62
73. Obama said that Goolsbee didn't meet with the Canadians to tell
them not to worry about NAFTA--and that was true. He met with them previously at THEIR intiation, but it was not for that purpose, as it turns out, and the embassy apologized. Turns out that HILLARY'S campaign was the one being investigated for hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #62
85. Thank you HH! When the facts are so well known, I don't always post a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Maybe that's because
the Canadian embassy contacted Goolsbee and during a lengthy discussion (2/8), NAFTA came up and Goolsbee didn't say anything different that what Obama has stated all along. He was NOT there on behalf of the campaign.

There's something really rotten in Denma...Canada....and Clintonland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yep, blame the Clintons
for Obama's ineptitude. If he can't deal with a country like Canada, how do you expect him to deal with.........us say, Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. This has nothing to do with ineptitude. This was an entirely fabricated hit job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
57. Even the Cnadian government doesn't deny the facts, but were angry the memo was leaked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. What facts? Goolsbee never said anything to them that was different
than what Obama said publicly. The Canadian government apologized already. Waiting to see what they say about Hillary now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #61
96. That's not what the memo states. Were you there? The Canadians are doing classic damage control.
That is all....because they were all caught with their pants down, so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #96
107. The Embassy admits that Goolsbee's story is accurate. Sorry, toots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. what's rotten is Obama denied any meeting ever occurred, until confronted with the evidence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. He sure did.
He's a liar, plain and simple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. In the initial story, he didn't deny a meeting occurred, just doubted it, and
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 10:22 PM by wienerdoggie
certainly didn't agree with what was being said about it. Then the embassy said that meeting didn't take place, and Obama's campaign agreed. Turns out a DIFFERENT meeting took place in Chicago, with a different advisor, who didn't INITIATE the meeting. He didn't lie at all. Hillary's campaign actually contacted the Canadians, though. Your outrage is misdirected--It's HILLARY that winked at the Canadians while lying to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. ha---the RW Canada gov got caught--pub. relations is to go into damage control mode--get it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Much ado about nothing
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 10:33 PM by StClone
Fact: Canada contacted Obama's employee and Barack was unaware.
Fact: Canada stated it wanted contacts with possible U.S. Prez. Candidates.
Fact: Canada released that they contacted Obama's Campaign.
Fact: There were no "negotiations" (which is ridiculous on the face of it).
Inference, based on fear mongering on top of nothing of substance and that's a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Fact: Obama denied any meeting happened, until the evidence was in his face
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. You have your facts 100% wrong. The EMBASSY denied that
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 10:24 PM by wienerdoggie
a meeting took place in DC. Obama was NOT AWARE that someone from the embassy contacted one of his advisors IN CHICAGO. It's HILLARY who denied a meeting ever took place, and in fact, it's true. SHE is the liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. No. His campaign denied it repeatedly. Durbin denied it flat out on TV Monday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I don't care what Durbin said. Tell me where Obama lied about Goulsbee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. You should care. He was speaking on Obama's behalf for the campaign. and
there were other reports preceding this where Obama was questioned and he answered he "doubted" a meeting took place, evading the question...unless you prefer the worse explanantion, that he doesn't know what his own advisors are doing, including speaking to other countries governments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:41 PM
Original message
His camp "doubted" the initial meeting, in the WRONG first version of the
story, took place--BUT didn't deny it, in that same story. Hillary's camp flat out denied it. I want someone to find me a quote from Obama, or from one of his official campaign spokesmen, where Obama denied that Goulsbee met with Canadians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
39. So, none of his advisors knows what they're doing, or what is going on? How is this an answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #39
48. NONE of them, or one advisor that discussed something? That's a pretty
big mountain you're trying to build out of this molehill. Especially considering the managerial incompetence of the Clinton camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. PS- That's what I want, a president who claims to be unaware of what his staff is doing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. His advisor was CONTACTED, not the other way around. I guess
you can blame Obama for not knowing that ONE advisor in Chicago didn't tell him that he talked to a Canadian guy. But then, I'm sure Hillary knew where all her campaign money went, right? Patti Solis Doyle didn't tell Hillary that she was broke, and then she had to lend herself 5 million? Now THAT'S mismanagement!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. and held a meeting without Obama approving it or knowing about it? How comforting.
PS- Changing the subject is avoiding the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. That's all ya got left, now, huh? Hate to see a good scandal crumble, don't ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. What? What is "all ya got left?" Your statement doesn't even make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. You thought you had something, and it crumbled to dust. Hee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #55
65. No, you went around in circles over whether Obama denied it, or his advisor did it, or...?
And never made a point except to say Durbin was wrong.

Well, he was speaking for the campaign on MONDAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #65
77. The story is nothing. The main point of it, Obama lying about NAFTA, is debunked.
Now you're left to wondering which advisor said what when. Pathetic. No "there" there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #77
87. 1. The meeting and remarks were not debunked 2. His lying about the meeting is the main point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #87
89. He did not lie. It was Hillary's campaign that lied. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #89
100. How so? You should be sorry for your misstatements and irrelevant responses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #100
103. Your entire post is bogus. Hillary is the one with the NAFTA problem now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #55
74. fact: Obama had denied there was any meeting, until confronted with evidence
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 11:01 PM by amborin
The Toronto Star

March 4, 2008 Tuesday Canadian trouble engulfs Obama;

BYLINE: Tim Harper, Toronto Star

snip

The memo, obtained by The Associated Press, said Obama's top economic adviser assured a Canadian consular official during a Feb. 8 meeting in Chicago that the Illinois senator's criticism of NAFTA should be read as "political positioning (rather) than a clear articulation of policy plans."
The Obama adviser, Austan Goolsbee, said the Canadian author of the memo, Joseph DeMora, had misinterpreted his remarks during a 40-minute meeting solicited by the Canadians.

"He's not quoting me," Goolsbee told AP. "I certainly did not use that phrase in any way."
Goolsbee said maybe two or three minutes of the meeting involved discussions on NAFTA.
The release of the memo, however, placed Obama on the defensive on the issue in a state in which he was trying to score a knockout blow against Clinton today.

In Carrollton, Texas, Obama told reporters: "Nobody reached out to the Canadians to try to assure them of anything."

Asked why he had appeared to deny a report last week that such a meeting had taken place, Obama said: "That was the information I had at the time."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #74
79. He told the truth. 'Nuff said. He denied that one of his advisors
was sent out to lie about NAFTA on his behalf. That's the truth. Give it up. It's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #79
93. he was wishy washy and reporters and OHIO unions knew that. Hense the lose in OHIO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #93
101. That is very spot on...contributing to his loss. Ohioans know the score. They didn't appreciate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #101
105. Hillary lied to Ohio. And the rest of the country will find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. Once again Bill was doing his own thing
And he had to be corralled. Hill's very husband has doing his own stand up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ada chupitos perez Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:45 PM
Original message
Obama's embassador contacted the Chicago office of Canada
that's the news so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. Uh, no. Unless you can find me a link that says Goolsbee contacted
them first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Tell that to Bill
Hey I will vote for Hillary no matter how bent out of shape her supporters get. Can we all just get along?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Sounds like Bush doesn't it?
"I didn't know Scooter Libby was leaking information on Valerie Plame"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Oh for Chrissakes
What are you trying to do here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Yes. His responses in situations like this are troublesome.
Like how he made it seem he barely knew Rezko during the debate when HRC first brought it up.

Sort of "Kenny Boy" who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Canda was parsing words yest. and along with Obama were in FULL damage cont. mode!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:41 PM
Original message
Mutual damage control....made them both look very bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
40. Obama was supposed to answer questions
Based on what he didn't fully know? Canada has apologized for the mess. So this is the great DU mind trust at work. Wow makes me wonder what the really stupid knuckle draggers sites have on us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
49. Waiting to hear all about Hillary and the Canadians, now that Obama's
hands are clean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. HA HA---that is the point--BO tried to 'esplan' but he just kept digging a hole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
50. yes--I heard BO press conf. He came across lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #50
70. Sun Times reporters came to Texas because he'd evaded their questions for weeks.
It was a big story in Chicago before it became national due to their journalistic diligence and the AP report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #70
78. evade, squirm, run off in a huff
shows a lack of integrity and leadership skills

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #78
91. He turned and quickly walked away. It shows both inexperience and poor reaction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. An apology is in order, as is an explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #35
51. I'm waiting for Hillary to explain why she told the Canadians not to worry about NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #51
68. Nice attempt to change the subject. The first tactic of all high-school debate teams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #68
80. Why did Hillary lie about NAFTA? Because we know Obama didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #80
92. please do not include me in your "we". and Where is this 'lie" you claim HRC did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #80
97. You are really grasping at straws now, trying to change the charge to her, and misstate the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. Did you see the link?
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 11:29 PM by wienerdoggie
edit--you posted on the Latest Breaking News thread about Hillary being the one lying about NAFTA, and being the original target of the story, and yet you make an entirely bogus post about Obama's debunked role! That takes BRASS BALLS! Congratulations!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #99
109. What in the world are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #109
112. This thread--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #112
121. Please see my response to this below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #80
125. Repetition of the same sub-level tactics will not produce a new result,
neither will they absolve you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
59. I think so too, from Hillary:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. Where is Hillary's tax return?
What is Hillary hiding?

Speaking of Scooter Libby like problems, what is Hillary hiding?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Avoid the question, change the subject....zero points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. No, the OP is stupid, the story is bogus, and Harper is investigating in damage control mode
What is Hillary hiding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. The Canadian government responds to a bogus story? Now that's stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. See, stupid. The Canadian government is investigating the source of the bogus story.
It's not only illegal to interfere in another country's election, but also to pass on false information.

Get it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #53
76. Don't continue to call names or I won't respond. The C governement is investigating WHO 'leaked'
the memo. They are not denying a meeting took place or what was discussed.

They are claiming it was private information!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #76
86. None of this matters the story is bogus. Do you think Obama is opposed to free trade?
Do you think he's for stricter environmental, labor and safety standards?

What's the story?

You are pretending this is a big deal and it's about as stupid as the Somalian garb story.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #53
81. Your behavior wouldn't be tolerated in any debate, you know?
I doubt you'd say it to my face either.

That's what I hate most about blogs, people feel so free to hurl things they wouldn't have the GUTS to do in person.

I try to never write something I wouldn't say i person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #81
88. Let me make it into a full sentence: "See, this is stupid."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #88
94. In a debate you score zero points with simple name calling and rude behavior. I won't reply again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #94
106. I repeat the OP is stupid, the article is bogus. I don't care about your point system. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
56. ROVE IS HERE again FOLKS---changing the subject . Watch out. ROVE IS ON THIS THREAD!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #56
63. Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. ROVE is up to his tricks again. ALL STAY AWAY---STINKY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #67
75. Yeah, Hillary's adopted his tactics and landed
permanently behind! To quote Hillary: "Thanks Karl."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #75
95. POT MEET KETTLE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #95
108. Are you saying I'm the same as Hillary when it comes to Rove?
Great argument! LOL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
54. I think you've squeezed all the juice out of that bullshit.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 10:50 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. yup: BO ended up looking like BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. I guess you missed this: "A Hollow Victory Based on a Lie"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. Hillary 3:1 yesterday. She has the MOJO~~ go Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. Moved her solidly into second place ... Wait! Isn't that where she started?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #69
82. The momentum is hers...and the powers that be can't stand that they don't bring her down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #82
98. yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #82
102. She wins a canned ham for coming in second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #102
119. I thought 2nd place prize was a gift certificate for a free small coke at Wendy's?
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 12:03 AM by Lord Helmet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
64. I don't think any invasions are planned for oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #64
83. Could you explain what you're saying more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #83
110. Easy. Comparing that with the Cheney Energy Task Force is a stretch
as far as seriousness goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #110
117. The comparison was made about the secrecy and denials, thougn I do believe economic policy is as
important as energy policy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #110
120. Obama is running on a platform of no more back room politics, ie: Bush & Cheney secrecy.
Though I'm sure his intent is not sinister, but that isn't my claim in the comparison. It's the lack of transparency, the denials, and the implication by the CAN government and Obamas responses that we have no right to know what goes on behind closed doors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMatt Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
84. Hillary supporters lecturing on openness - you people become more Orwellian by the minute. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #84
90. Did you have a point or reply to the facts? What does "you people" mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMatt Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #90
104. Supporters of the health care task force despot lecturing others about openness
about something this trivial is Orwellian in the extreme. And by you people, I mean you... a mindless supporter of Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #104
114. Changing the topic, avoiding an answer, calling names, don't speak anything to the question.
And , it is ridiculous and offensive to compare to HRC's efforts to get the country health care. Firstly, she was attempting to do good for the people, not telling the public one thing and doing another. Secondly, she did not deny what she was attempting to do, or that she held meetings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
111. So what's the truth here??
Did Obama contact the Canadian government or did Hillary contact the Canadian government??? I am reading conflicting reports about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #111
113. Hillary did--the media decided to go after Obama, though--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #113
116. This article confirms that CTV reported the Obama campaign made innappropriate remarks, and
says nothing about his campaign denying the meeting, which they did.

In fact, it seems to indicate that although Tom Clark set out to do a report on HRC's NAFTA position, he pursued the story regarding the Obama campaigns unusual remarks and meeting as more important and timely.

It also says nothing about the CAN government claiming the memo and meeting notes were private information we had no right to know about.

Which was my original point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #116
118. LOL! Nice spin. The Canadian government has confirmed Obama's
version, but NOT HILLARY'S--:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #118
122. No, the CAN government has said it was angry about the memo being 'leaked'
and implied the meeting information was private and implied we had no right to know about it.

They did not state that there was no meeting, or any comment about Obama denying that there was.

They did not deny what the memo stated about Goolsbee's remarks on behalf of the campaign either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #122
124. They apologized for mischaracterizing Goolsbee's remarks and confirmed
that they were never told anything different from what Obama said to the American public. And thus the story endeth. Hillary's story, however, is just beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #111
115. My point is that he denied the meeting, and the CAN government telling us we have no right to know
about such meetings and what is discussed.

But I believe the Canadian government first contacted the Obama campaign because they were distressed about his NAFTA remarks, and then the Obama campaign contacted them about having Goolsbee meet with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #115
123. He doubted the bogus meeting that CTV talked about--when he got the facts in
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 12:11 AM by wienerdoggie
about Goolsbee in Chicago, he denied that they met to reassure them about NAFTA. That's it, end of story. That dead horse is starting to decay and stink now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC