|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:06 PM Original message |
Canada: Telling Americans we have no right to know. Obama: Lesson 1, No Cheney Style meetings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. The Clinton campaign was first to contact Canada about NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Not claiming privacy. Not to say one thing publicly and another privately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Obama's advisor didn't do that. That's been debunked. Sorry, no ammo here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
30. Fact is--both Canada and Obama were in FULL damage control yesterday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Please tell us the SECRET SOURCE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. yes, Obama owes Americans an apology for making deals behind our backs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I think it is another example of his inexperience that causes poor knee jerk response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Can you find me the quote where Obama said that Goulsbee DIDN'T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Oh yes, it's all so complicated. His campaign flat out denied meeting with them period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Find me a quote that specifies that once the media fingered Goulsbee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Durbin flatly denied it on TV Monday. It's Goolsbee, though I like Ghoulsbee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #27 |
38. Denied that a meeting took place, or denied the substance or purpose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Denied that a meeting took place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Well, I guess Durbin was wrong, but then, I don't see a link or a quote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #20 |
62. Here ya go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:00 PM Response to Reply #62 |
73. Obama said that Goolsbee didn't meet with the Canadians to tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:10 PM Response to Reply #62 |
85. Thank you HH! When the facts are so well known, I don't always post a link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Maybe that's because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Yep, blame the Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. This has nothing to do with ineptitude. This was an entirely fabricated hit job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
57. Even the Cnadian government doesn't deny the facts, but were angry the memo was leaked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. What facts? Goolsbee never said anything to them that was different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:22 PM Response to Reply #61 |
96. That's not what the memo states. Were you there? The Canadians are doing classic damage control. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:31 PM Response to Reply #96 |
107. The Embassy admits that Goolsbee's story is accurate. Sorry, toots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. what's rotten is Obama denied any meeting ever occurred, until confronted with the evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. He sure did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. In the initial story, he didn't deny a meeting occurred, just doubted it, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
34. ha---the RW Canada gov got caught--pub. relations is to go into damage control mode--get it!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StClone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
10. Much ado about nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Fact: Obama denied any meeting happened, until the evidence was in his face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. You have your facts 100% wrong. The EMBASSY denied that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. No. His campaign denied it repeatedly. Durbin denied it flat out on TV Monday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. I don't care what Durbin said. Tell me where Obama lied about Goulsbee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. You should care. He was speaking on Obama's behalf for the campaign. and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:41 PM Original message |
His camp "doubted" the initial meeting, in the WRONG first version of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
39. So, none of his advisors knows what they're doing, or what is going on? How is this an answer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:47 PM Response to Reply #39 |
48. NONE of them, or one advisor that discussed something? That's a pretty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. PS- That's what I want, a president who claims to be unaware of what his staff is doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:30 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. His advisor was CONTACTED, not the other way around. I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. and held a meeting without Obama approving it or knowing about it? How comforting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:45 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. That's all ya got left, now, huh? Hate to see a good scandal crumble, don't ya? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:50 PM Response to Reply #41 |
52. What? What is "all ya got left?" Your statement doesn't even make sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. You thought you had something, and it crumbled to dust. Hee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #55 |
65. No, you went around in circles over whether Obama denied it, or his advisor did it, or...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #65 |
77. The story is nothing. The main point of it, Obama lying about NAFTA, is debunked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #77 |
87. 1. The meeting and remarks were not debunked 2. His lying about the meeting is the main point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:14 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. He did not lie. It was Hillary's campaign that lied. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:28 PM Response to Reply #89 |
100. How so? You should be sorry for your misstatements and irrelevant responses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:30 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. Your entire post is bogus. Hillary is the one with the NAFTA problem now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:00 PM Response to Reply #55 |
74. fact: Obama had denied there was any meeting, until confronted with evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:03 PM Response to Reply #74 |
79. He told the truth. 'Nuff said. He denied that one of his advisors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:19 PM Response to Reply #79 |
93. he was wishy washy and reporters and OHIO unions knew that. Hense the lose in OHIO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:29 PM Response to Reply #93 |
101. That is very spot on...contributing to his loss. Ohioans know the score. They didn't appreciate it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:30 PM Response to Reply #101 |
105. Hillary lied to Ohio. And the rest of the country will find out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StClone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #33 |
45. Once again Bill was doing his own thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ada chupitos perez (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:45 PM Original message |
Obama's embassador contacted the Chicago office of Canada |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
43. Uh, no. Unless you can find me a link that says Goolsbee contacted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StClone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Tell that to Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Sounds like Bush doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StClone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Oh for Chrissakes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:35 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Yes. His responses in situations like this are troublesome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Canda was parsing words yest. and along with Obama were in FULL damage cont. mode!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:41 PM Original message |
Mutual damage control....made them both look very bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StClone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
40. Obama was supposed to answer questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
49. Waiting to hear all about Hillary and the Canadians, now that Obama's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. HA HA---that is the point--BO tried to 'esplan' but he just kept digging a hole! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
50. yes--I heard BO press conf. He came across lame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:58 PM Response to Reply #50 |
70. Sun Times reporters came to Texas because he'd evaded their questions for weeks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:02 PM Response to Reply #70 |
78. evade, squirm, run off in a huff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:16 PM Response to Reply #78 |
91. He turned and quickly walked away. It shows both inexperience and poor reaction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
35. An apology is in order, as is an explanation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:50 PM Response to Reply #35 |
51. I'm waiting for Hillary to explain why she told the Canadians not to worry about NAFTA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #51 |
68. Nice attempt to change the subject. The first tactic of all high-school debate teams. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:03 PM Response to Reply #68 |
80. Why did Hillary lie about NAFTA? Because we know Obama didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:17 PM Response to Reply #80 |
92. please do not include me in your "we". and Where is this 'lie" you claim HRC did? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:24 PM Response to Reply #80 |
97. You are really grasping at straws now, trying to change the charge to her, and misstate the facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:26 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. Did you see the link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:33 PM Response to Reply #99 |
109. What in the world are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:36 PM Response to Reply #109 |
112. This thread-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #112 |
121. Please see my response to this below. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 12:59 AM Response to Reply #80 |
125. Repetition of the same sub-level tactics will not produce a new result, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #35 |
59. I think so too, from Hillary: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
36. Where is Hillary's tax return? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Avoid the question, change the subject....zero points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. No, the OP is stupid, the story is bogus, and Harper is investigating in damage control mode |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:47 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. The Canadian government responds to a bogus story? Now that's stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:50 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. See, stupid. The Canadian government is investigating the source of the bogus story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #53 |
76. Don't continue to call names or I won't respond. The C governement is investigating WHO 'leaked' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #76 |
86. None of this matters the story is bogus. Do you think Obama is opposed to free trade? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:05 PM Response to Reply #53 |
81. Your behavior wouldn't be tolerated in any debate, you know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #81 |
88. Let me make it into a full sentence: "See, this is stupid." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:19 PM Response to Reply #88 |
94. In a debate you score zero points with simple name calling and rude behavior. I won't reply again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:31 PM Response to Reply #94 |
106. I repeat the OP is stupid, the article is bogus. I don't care about your point system. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
56. ROVE IS HERE again FOLKS---changing the subject . Watch out. ROVE IS ON THIS THREAD!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. Here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. ROVE is up to his tricks again. ALL STAY AWAY---STINKY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:00 PM Response to Reply #67 |
75. Yeah, Hillary's adopted his tactics and landed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:20 PM Response to Reply #75 |
95. POT MEET KETTLE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:32 PM Response to Reply #95 |
108. Are you saying I'm the same as Hillary when it comes to Rove? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
54. I think you've squeezed all the juice out of that bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. yup: BO ended up looking like BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. I guess you missed this: "A Hollow Victory Based on a Lie" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:58 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Hillary 3:1 yesterday. She has the MOJO~~ go Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Moved her solidly into second place ... Wait! Isn't that where she started? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:06 PM Response to Reply #69 |
82. The momentum is hers...and the powers that be can't stand that they don't bring her down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:24 PM Response to Reply #82 |
98. yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:29 PM Response to Reply #82 |
102. She wins a canned ham for coming in second. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #102 |
119. I thought 2nd place prize was a gift certificate for a free small coke at Wendy's? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
64. I don't think any invasions are planned for oil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #64 |
83. Could you explain what you're saying more? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:33 PM Response to Reply #83 |
110. Easy. Comparing that with the Cheney Energy Task Force is a stretch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:56 PM Response to Reply #110 |
117. The comparison was made about the secrecy and denials, thougn I do believe economic policy is as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:59 PM Response to Reply #110 |
120. Obama is running on a platform of no more back room politics, ie: Bush & Cheney secrecy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMatt (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
84. Hillary supporters lecturing on openness - you people become more Orwellian by the minute. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:15 PM Response to Reply #84 |
90. Did you have a point or reply to the facts? What does "you people" mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMatt (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:30 PM Response to Reply #90 |
104. Supporters of the health care task force despot lecturing others about openness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:38 PM Response to Reply #104 |
114. Changing the topic, avoiding an answer, calling names, don't speak anything to the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
111. So what's the truth here?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:37 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. Hillary did--the media decided to go after Obama, though-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:53 PM Response to Reply #113 |
116. This article confirms that CTV reported the Obama campaign made innappropriate remarks, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:56 PM Response to Reply #116 |
118. LOL! Nice spin. The Canadian government has confirmed Obama's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 12:06 AM Response to Reply #118 |
122. No, the CAN government has said it was angry about the memo being 'leaked' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 12:10 AM Response to Reply #122 |
124. They apologized for mischaracterizing Goolsbee's remarks and confirmed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #111 |
115. My point is that he denied the meeting, and the CAN government telling us we have no right to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #115 |
123. He doubted the bogus meeting that CTV talked about--when he got the facts in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC