|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
HEyHEY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:08 AM Original message |
Clinton is full of shit on NAFTA too: CBC news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
purji (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blocker (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
2. OF course CNN is not talking about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
3. The issue is that Obama lied. He initially lied and said there was no meeting, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. No--he never sent an advisor to tell Canada anything about NAFTA-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. He probably didn't know the meeting had taken place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HEyHEY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. IT sounds to me what happened was.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
27. I agree n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. That meeting was so distorted, it didn't even sound like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #3 |
15. I guess you think if you say it enough though, it will make it true. That is BS and you know it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. HRC is the liar here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
6. Hmm, how do these things happen, I wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HEyHEY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. You mean the Conservative government and CTV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. I stand corrected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HEyHEY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #6 |
19. If this is true, how come there wasn't an Clinton NAFTA memo? Or better, why didn't the memo re both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Well, that's part of the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rndmprsn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
8. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
11. This is a test of how well Obama can fight back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:52 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Which she is. Thanks for repeating it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Hah. She's a social liberal but she's no economic populist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
workinclasszero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
26. This is a test of how well Obama can fight back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
12. Yes, she is. They're both full of it. NAFTA isn't hurting Ohio, China is. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HEyHEY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. It's time for Obama to declare hatred for the chinese! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
16. Too late, it's become an "Obama story" and Clinton has gotten what she wanted out of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Why does your sig say Obama-Clark, Wes isn't interested in Obama. Wishful thinking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Why does your sig say "I love this job"? Is being a professional masturbator fun? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Obama-Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
18. None of this refutes the fact that Hillary DIDN'T write the memo and DIDN'T leak it to media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
23. Obama needs to capitalize on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC