Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LULAC, Clinton Campaign Thinking of Suing TDP Over Caucus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:19 AM
Original message
LULAC, Clinton Campaign Thinking of Suing TDP Over Caucus
http://www.burntorangereport.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=DABCF3573F504028609C63C13422FE0C?diaryId=5301

LULAC=League of United Latin American Citizens


LULAC, Clinton Campaign Thinking of Suing TDP Over Caucus
by: Phillip Martin
Thu Mar 06, 2008 at 08:00 AM CST

Dear Clinton Campaign,

Don't be sore winners/losers. I read this from the Houston Chronicle:

Garry Mauro said the campaign will file complaints with the state Democratic Party's local credential committees, and request hearings. If the campaign isn't satisfied with the rulings meted out by the committees, legal action might follow. "We're not going to give up that option," he said.

Earlier today, the Clinton campaign said it had received hundreds of complaints about voting irregularities stemming from Tuesday night's caucuses. The complaints included Clinton supporters being turned away at the doors and Obama supporters not qualified to caucus being permitted to caucus.


We have reports of complaints of the Clinton camp, too. You all aren't all saints -- as much as you may think you are -- and trying to diminish the results of the caucus just because you lost there is cheap, petty, and underhanded. That's no way to win the Presidency -- not if you want anyone to follow you.

You had a good night. Don't ruin it with nonsense.

Sincerely,

Phillip Martin

---------------------------------------

Dear LULAC,

I read that you are considering suing the Texas Democratic Party because, as the article said, you are concerned that the voices of Latinos are not being heard. The article also noted that, while your group has not officially endorsed, a number of high ranking officials within your organization support Senator Hillary Clinton.

I'm Hispanic. So is my mother. We voted for Senator Barack Obama. We appreciate your concern, but our voices were heard.

So were the voices of 2.8 million Texans yesterday in the primary vote, and what looks like will be over 1 million Texans in the caucuses. It seems to be that plenty of Texans had their voices heard. The article noted one concern of yours:

"We had reports all night long and this morning of many, many people who couldn’t stay there anymore," says Vera. "It was 9:30, 10 o'clock and they haven’t even begun to vote."

I don't think a tremendous outpouring of democracy merits litigation. I also don't know how late caucuses exclusively hurt Latinos more than any other race, or any other type of Texas voter, for that matter.

As an Hispanic, I'd ask you to not drag me into this potential mess of a lawsuit. My family grew up in El Paso, and I was always taught to respect the rules and the process, when they are fairly created. I don't want to be considered chiple.

The rules for the Texas Democratic Primary were fairly created -- in fact, Gary Mauro (former Executive Director of the TDP) and Bob Slagle (former Chair of the TDP) both had a hands-on role in crafting and maintaining the TDP rules for the caucuses. Coincidently, they both played a prominent role in Senator Clinton's campaign in Texas.

I appreciate the role you play in Texas politics -- protecting the voice of Hispanic citizens. You've done tremendous work with congressional redistricting battles in the past, among other things. But 2.8 million voters in a primary, and over 1 million voters at caucuses, are lots of strong voices making themselves known

Let us stand up on our own. Let us be proud of what we did, and not pretend that we were somehow "tricked" or "mistreated." We weren't -- and continuing to suggest that we were doesn't help the trust -- or lack thereof -- the general public has in our community. There are times when we need legal protection -- and with all due respect, this isn't one of them.

Sincerely,

Phillip "Chato" Martin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. In regards to voting irregularities, why don't people simply video
proceedings?

My phone has 4 gig of storage and I can do 1 hour videos on one file.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Privacy issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No right to privacy at a caucus
State rules: Media is allowed at a caucus (and they don't need a press pass)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah there was a ton of news cameras at our caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Campaigning is allowed at caucuses. Caucus leaders can wear buttons, and such.
Try that at a polling place in a regular primary.

We get lawsuits every fucking year just because a polling person was wearing a goddamn button.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Finding people to sign up to video might be a problem.
In theory, I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's a lot harder to cheat in a caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Bullshit, it's a hell of a lot easier since the process makes no sense.
Everyone relies on the Captains to "do the right thing" and things like, oh, I dunno, doors being closed, people being kicked out, and such, are allowed because the Captains are supposedly infallible.

The nightmare stories from caucuses are everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Whatever you say boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Someone should send this to the lawyers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. we should sue her ass
shes the one breaking the rules and causing dissention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. You do that. Ms. Clinton
Take all that amazing turnout that the Democrats in my state gave to you and then stab us in the heart. We're a winner-take-all state with 34 electoral votes and our Democratic party has been re-energized and it is massive.

Go. Go ahead and sue Texas. If you can't recognize what you'd be losing come November, who needs you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC