|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:00 PM Original message |
Excuse me, but where was HRC's "concern" for Florida voters in 2000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. Question. Do you know she was in the Senate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. Yes. Certification of the election took place at the beginning of 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. She wasn't a Senator in 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. where was the OP's "concern" for the truth in 2008? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. just flamebaiting and showing his ignorance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Neither of the Clintons spoke up about the Bush theft of FL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Gore told President Clinton to keep his distance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. So when a crime is taking place, as long as someone tells you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. President Clinton quote 11/27/2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Wasn't 2000 less then 35 years ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. look at OP Quote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
36. Your argument is that because she'd been elected but not sworn in she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Ah...I see. Thanks. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
50. She was by the time Congress certified the results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MyNameGoesHere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. Ironic your screen name is Truth Hurts a lot. Bwaaahahaha. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diane R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. The Clintons threw Gore under the bus in 2000, like they threw Kerry in '04. To position Hillary 08 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
8. do try, please, to pretend that you actually understand things like elections-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. She was still co-President in 2000 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. we don't HAVE co=presidents-- try to understand that some of us here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Ok. I'll keep that in mind the next time HRC brags about her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
39. Rush is that you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheZug (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
9. She was "fighting" for them, she swears. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
13. The Clintons are very concerned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
14. Gore HIMSELF was in the Senate, and wouldn't step up to back up House Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
48. He couldn't; as Senate president he can only break ties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
17. Don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
18. She and Gore were never compadres. She probably did not mind all that much . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
19. Good question!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
20. Since Hillary wasn't in the Senate at the time, shouldn't we be asking the same question of Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. No she wasn't. She was still first lady. Must have been working on foreign policy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Working on foreign policy - like Obama was???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. She's the one touting experience noting being the first lady. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. And he is touting experience noting being a community organizer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
22. Hillary loves to tout her long record of experience and "leadership." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. no, the OP is not asking a legit question--hillary was NOT in the senate, and it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Yes, that precludes her from showing any concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. She had a duty to speak out, and she could have, if she chose to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. you are ignoring, and hoping we will overlook, the fact that your OP had to do with the SENATE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. I learned from the best-- HRC supporters on DU!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. nice try--but your ignorance is your ignorance, not the responsibility of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. Not a duty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #26 |
49. You can parse the word "concern" -- all day long if all you want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
52. She was in the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
32. So, because someone might not have fought hard enough then means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
33. Didn't Gore ask them notto step into his business...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. yup he wanted to distance himself from clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itcfish (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
40. Did I Miss Something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-07-08 09:56 AM Response to Reply #40 |
57. not to mention, gore wanted to distance himself from the clintons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
41. that was a gore issue. just cos we love him now, doesnt make this someone else's problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tandem5 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
43. Where's Donna Brazile's concern now? She was key in deciding to deny all the delegates instead of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
45. Irrelevant pointless post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
46. I agree.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. thats bullshit, gore didnt want help from the clintons. he picker lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:28 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. It wasn't Bill that could have campaigned.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 11:25 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. he wanted to distance himself from the clintons. would you campaign for someone who was shunning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
54. Same place her concern was this year, until she needed the delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC