Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Nelson and everyone else involved in the illegal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:04 PM
Original message
Bill Nelson and everyone else involved in the illegal
moving of the Primary dates for Fla/Mi should resign immediately. Then the states may re-do their Primaries. That should be the conditions. I'm tired of seeing that smarmy guy pointing the finger at Dean and the DNC, when he (Nelson) is clearly one of the people that is to blame. If His girl Hillary wasn't leading in the two states, which were understood to not count at the time, also, mind you, then this issue would be dead. There'd be no call to seat these voters per the tainted vote. These states should absolutely get another chance at this, complete with full campaigning- but the leaders who botched this so badly to feed their ego- need to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. would have been way smarter for Dean and DNC
to strip the superdelegates of their votes and leave the voters votes.
Because it was effectively the state official superdelegates who did the harm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That is probably a good idea in hindsight
But there is no way these votes based on the premise that they wouldn't count anyway, should count. No way, no how. A do-over or nothing at all would be the two options I'd put on the table. These politicians that caused the loss of their voters' rights should be shown the door as they are not representing their constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree with Michigan and don't agree with Florida
because there were other important issues on the ballot in Florida which a conscientious voter should have voted on. There were record breaking turnouts for primary election and all the candidates were on the ballot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. That would have been a good solution at the time, maybe
But if they were going to do that, they should have let the candidates campaign there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Its never right to deprive the voter of their vote
if you can't school your party officials, punish the party officials - don't punish the voters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Where was Obama's big anti-war speech in 2003?
Where was Obama's big anti-war speech in 2004, at Kerry's convention?
Where was Obama's big anti-war speech in 2005?
Where was Obama's big anti-war speech in 2006?
Where was Obama's anti-war filibuster in 2007? Was stopping the war worth standing up, Barack?
Perhaps obama's folks are asking, "If he's got more than a 2002 speech - where is it?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. In the same place as Clinton's tax returns?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k8conant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. None so blind as those who will not see:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's like the kid who killed his dad and seeks sympathy for being an orphan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Illegal? What law did he violate?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Not a federal law, but a DNC bylaw
Don't even pretend they were in the right to circumvent the primary date moving process. The rules are understood by all parties, but apparently do not need to be adhered to by a special few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Who exactly moved the primary date?
Senator Nelson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Among others, I believe Crist signed the bill to make it so
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 04:22 PM by Obama_for_our_future
At no point was Sen. Nelson against the move, by all accounts. Had he spoken out against it and not remained insistent that the tainted vote count, I would not be so adamantly opposed to his remaining in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. So, you admit that he had not part in moving the primary date?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I said, "among others"
Yes, he was very much a part of the shenanigans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. What part did he have?
Was he serving in the legislature which voted to move the primary date?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Are you saying he should resign his Senate seat???
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 04:28 PM by dbaker41
Get real. The people of Florida elected him to that seat, and you have no business or right calling for him to resign. At first I thought you meant only that he should resign as a delegate or state party official, but from your post downthread I gather you want him out of the Senate.

Sorry, it doesn't work that way.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. He is going to cost his state over 10 mil for a re-vote
If the voters of Fla don't mind that kind of waste because a small group of politicians wanted to flex their muscle, then so be it. We all know he is one of Hillary's most vocal surrogates, so he is beyond reproach. "Let the voters be heard". With a re-vote, at the state's expense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Nelson doesn't want a costly revote. He wants to seat the delegates which were already chosen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC