|
Here's a story for you Hillary fans who assert "experience" but then say not a word about what it is. (????)
There was a guy a while back from Illinois like Sen. Obama. He served four terms in the state legislature like Sen. Obama. He served just one term in the US House, whereas Sen. Obama has served three years now in the US Senate. He was a lawyer like Sen. Obama. Much like Sen. Obama he was highly intelligent, and he earned a reputation as a great speaker like Sen. Obama. The man's name was Abraham Lincoln, and he went on to save the union and free the slaves as President, and has gone down in history as one of our greatest Presidents.
Now tell me, did Lincoln have enough "experience"?? Because by your standards I suppose not. And as to Hillary, just what makes her so much more "experienced" anyhow? Obama has served in government LONGER than Hillary. Is it her years as First Lady? Hm. Since when does the First Lady make a single executive decision?? Since when does she answer the red phone at 3am? So she went to some foreign countries as first lady and made some speeches. Well, Mr. Obama has LIVED in a foreign country and visited others. So tell me Hillary folks, just WHAT is her overarching experience advantage here??? That she has been in Washington longer? Hm, not a great resume as to that, considering how screwed up Washington is.
Please, Hillary folks, do respond. And kindly cite SPECIFICS.
|