Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NAFTA Smear: A calculated duping of the MSM to steal OHIO and TX???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:59 PM
Original message
Poll question: NAFTA Smear: A calculated duping of the MSM to steal OHIO and TX???
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 11:32 PM by Sensitivity
Obama appeared on the verge of winning both TX and OH.

Then came the NAFTA smear which attacked his core strengths -- his reputation for honesty and integrity -- regarding the hottest issue for the voters.

Could it be that NAFTA-gate was an orchestrated operation of the clinton campaign?

The fact that now emerge are that:

1. The clinton campaign initiated the call to the Canadian Gov. to calm fears.
2. A Canadian official contacted an Obama advisor, who responded consistently with Obama's long held position.

Somehow, a U.S. Based reporter for CTV mangled the facts to produce (deliberately) a false report implying that Obama was being disingenuos on NAFTA.

Somehow, specific video capture jocks and bloggers were ready to rapidly propagate, twist and amplify each aspect of the false story and demand that the MSM report it without time to investigate.

Was this all coincidental or deviously planned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unfortinately your "facts" are bs...just some more Obama lies to
cover his lies...try to take some responsibility for your saint fucking up big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It will soon be revealed that the clinton campaign rep was Jim Blanchard
former governor of Michigan and Clinton appointed ambassador to canada.

Clinton has channeled Karl Rove. She gets what she gets now. This is the DEMOCRATIC party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Bill and Hill calling their favors in.....
turned out beautifully for them.

We'll see for how long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. It made so much more sence that Bill's boys would be the ones calling Canada

Yet Hillary's campaign got the MSM to smear Obama. NOT BAD FOR A DAYS WORK, I must say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Jim Blanchard?
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 11:36 PM by cryingshame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Source of your alternative "facts"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. yes, Clintons colluded with the rightwing foreign government in Canada. Let them deny it.
someone should make them deny it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Is Clinton able to do a Cheney re press manipulation to promote falsehoods
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. Obviously Bill Clinton is behind this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. would not be surprized
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC