Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has there been any further word on the lack of Obama votes in Harlem?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:07 AM
Original message
Has there been any further word on the lack of Obama votes in Harlem?
I haven't seen anything more on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm, first time I've heard of it. I suspect it's because it's Bill Clinton country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. There was a NYT piece that some precincts recorded zero votes for Clinton
and some had zero for Obama.

Obamatons only want to talk about half of it, though.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Both Obama and Clinton recorded zero votes in some precincts
it wasn't a problem limited to Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. There were 80 precincts in Harlem with 0 votes for Obama (I don't know how many Clinton had 0 in)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's an article from DUer autorank but I've been waiting for him to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Thanks -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Doesn't Bill have an office in Harlem?
He's been tight with that community for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Define : " tight with that community". Just having an office in the area
makes him "tight with the community"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Working in the community.
Having a presence in the community.

If he had an office in Troy, Ohio, he'd be tight with that community, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. So, who is he tight with, besides the guy at the local sandwich shop?
The pizza delivery kid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. chubby interns?

oh no i didn't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I give up...what's your point?
If a famous guy has ties to your town/city/state/community, it's a source of pride for the community. Hometown advantage. That's all I'm saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. The review of the records was supposed to take a few weeks..and that was mid Feb
this is what I found:

City election officials this week said that their formal review of the results, which will not be completed for weeks, had confirmed some major discrepancies between the vote totals reported publicly -- and unofficially -- on primary night and the actual tally on hundreds of voting machines across the city.:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. What further word do you need?
The votes were counted on election night.

Early reports showed some problems - those were never official tallies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I think you're missing info.
The counts were done election night. There were mistakes. The mistakes were discovered when the numbers were canvassed. Everything was corrected on the recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. the wrong numbers were NEVER part of any official tally
this is a bullshit attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. I agree
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 11:12 AM by Bleachers7
:shrug:

I don't see where the attack is? The OP just asked the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I think you're being disingenuous
every time this topic is brought up, it's in the context of implying that the Clinton campaign was playing dirty tricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I'm really not
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 11:21 AM by Bleachers7
Maybe others are, I personally have not been. I live in NY and have a good sense for the voting machines, counts, procedure, etc. I've been a poll watcher in NY for most elections since 2000. Now the person a few posts up talking about Harlem and Clinton's office is a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. They finished counting the votes.
Overall, it didn't change the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC