Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Favorite fallacies of the Clinton wins the "important states" argument.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:04 PM
Original message
Favorite fallacies of the Clinton wins the "important states" argument.
fallacy 1: Clinton could win OH the same way she won it against Barack: by capturing the rural vote. Sorry, but those will all be McCain's. Which leaves her with the cities, which Barack won. So who votes for Clinton in Ohio?

fallacy 2: Barack didn't beat Hillary in swing states. Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, Colorado, etc. prove that wrong.

fallacy 3: some states that were blue last time aren't trending red and are safe if Hillary is the nominee. There's Hawaii: poised to be red in the fall, unless the native son runs.

fallacy 4: Florida is a swing state. No, sorry: Florida is a red state, with the red apparatus in place, red rules, red voter registration, a red governor, and red dirty politics. The single smartest thing democrats can do in the fall is ignore Florida--or make a show effort there that forces MacBombIran to splash out some cash. But Dems will NOT carry it.

fallacy 5: Only Hillary can win the biggest true blue big states in the Fall, because she won them in the primary. Which of these big blues will go to McCain: California, New York? Please.

fallacy 6: Hillary can turnout the vote to unseat a single traditionally red state. Show me where. By contrast, Virginia, marginally red last time, looks like a possible switch to blue with Barack at the top of the ticket. Even North Carolina and Georgia might be doable, but only if Clinton's instant and automated GOP GOTV isn't in play.

fallacy 7: The candidates bring equal turnouts to the table. True--but not necessarily to the benefit of the Democratic Party. One candidate brings new voters and motivated Democrats, the other brings termites out of the woodwork to vote against her. One has crossover appeal without Rush Limbaugh's help, the other doesn't. One can help downticket races, the other drags down the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please send that in to Olbermann, Hartmann, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. will do--do you know where can I get email addresses in one place...is there one place?
thanks for the suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. THANK YOU.
The contention that Obama won't carry California or New York or any other reliably blue state that Clinton won is sky high, disingenuous bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. welcome to DU, Mooney!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. #5
Is exactly what I've been saying. We NYers didn't even go red after the 911 attacks and frankly, as we are very vulnerable to whatever attacks might happen in this country, maybe those who are so scared of the terrorists coming to get them should ask why we aren't being scared red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC