Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't know which of you Obama Supporters is advising Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:47 PM
Original message
I don't know which of you Obama Supporters is advising Obama
....regarding the tactics you have used all primary season here on DU........but please do keep it up. It's rather interesting watching his campaign implode from within. I guess that's what happens when rank amateurs try and take over the world.:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Implode?
If this is imploding, then yes, I also hope we keep it up.

I hope we keep imploding all the way to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hueyshort Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. What do you think intelligent people see
when they read these hate mongering threads?
First, you are insulting their intelligence (they are not republicans)
Second, you sound like hysterical nincompoops.
Third you don't need to lie perpetually.

You are sliming your candidate into oblivion when you post
hit diaries that twist the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. How Would You Know What Intelligent People See?
Scat. Trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #34
64. LOL!
snap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
81. I'm sorry, were you talking to me?
Or did you mean to respond to the OP?

Because I simply satirized the OP. I wasn't hate-mongering, I wasn't hysterical, I didn't lie, and I wasn't posting any "diary."

If some people feel I've insulted their intelligence... well, good. They had it coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
66. The technical definition of imploding is winning more delegates than one's opponent.
Dear God, is there nothing the man won't sink to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, let's leave it to the Professional Corporate Globalists.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why is hillary losing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigleaf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And why can't she catch him now? It's the math, those pesky numbers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. those pesky numbers show he can't win unless she drops out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. Completely untrue.
He has a clear lead in pledged delegates, and the superdelegates will put him over the 2025 number needed for the nomination.

Hillary doesn't have a chance. The only way she can tie him in pledged delegates at this point is to win 62% of every single remaining state. Ain't gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. ha ha--your numbers keep changing as she takes the wins. go for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #43
63. Did you hear about California? Texas?
Yes, the numbers keep changing, because she keeps losing delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
42. You Clinton supporters have no problem posting bullshit
I mean really, do you actually believe the bullshit you post or are you doing this just for the fuck of it?

Obama can't win until Hillary drops out? He is up by 100 in the count, he is rasing 3 times the amount of money she is, and you are going to claim with a streight face that Hillary has this locked? What the fuck is wrong with you, please explain this to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. Oh Thank You Thank You
I am still waiting for an answer. I asked a similar question 2 days ago. WTF:wtf: is wrong with them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
62. "Obama can't win until Hillary drops out"--yup--you nailed it. But she will not drop out.
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 02:30 PM by rodeodance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Why after spending 3-1 can't he win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Why is he spending 3-1? Because he's out-raising her 3-1
Scoreboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. He's pissed it away. He lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Are you for real?
"Your girl" spends $500,000 on parking, $1600 on donuts and $10 MILLION for a Blackwater's PR Flack to take a crap on her campaign, and you say OBAMA pissed it away?

You may not have noticed, but we WON Texas. Which -- according to Bubba -- is all we had to do to secure the nomination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. He pissed it down the toilet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. No, you're not. What a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. How very mature of you
how can someone that has been here so long be that brain dead because of Hillary's support?

Obama Supporter: Obama has this nomination locked.
Random Clinton Supporter: No he doesn't, he pissed it away.
Obama Supporter: He virtually has it locked. Here is the evidance for what I am saying...
Random Clinton Supporter after ignoring all that evidance: No he doesn't, he pissed it away.

You guys are classy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. He won 2 states, and she won 2 states
You would have to be completely delusional to claim that coming back from a 20-30% deficit in the polls to essentially tie in Texas is "pissing away" money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
74. maybe he can loan himself 5 milly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
85. bwahaha
:rofl:

There's no talking to some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. At this rate he'll never make it to November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Wow, if you're really that concerned, you should be urging Hillary to drop out
We both know she can't win without cheating, so why not show some true patriotism and help our nominee save his cash?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
40. ha ha--BO spent 3:1 and he lost 3:1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #40
77. What are you on about? Obama won Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. ha ha--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. Once again, Scoreboard.
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 04:30 PM by jgraz
Based on her victory in the presidential primary, Mrs. Clinton took 65 delegates to Mr. Obama's 61. But based on early precinct convention returns, he could walk away with a 98-95 victory in overall delegates.


http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/topstories/stories/030708dnpolconventions.de9cc4.html


And


http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/7/11339/50182/559/471347
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExtraGriz Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. heard it was 4-1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Imploding? Have your read the NYT's article about Hillary's campaign?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope they keep comparing Obama to 90's era repugs.
It keeps on reminding everyone that Hillary is a dynasty candidate. Clinton fatigue anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. aww, you poor little thing. wishful thinking won't make it so
Obama's winning. Hillary is losing. That's the way it is. Better for you to accept it, than live in a delusional world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Implode? You wish. Keep drinkin' the kool aide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. One singular thoughtful resignation hardly qualifies as an implosion.
Hillary FIRED two people earlier.

PHD's are not "rank amateurs" either.

This lady certainly isn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samantha_Power . Having dedicated her life to stopping genocide truly makes a person a total flunky. . .NOT

He is not surrounded by duplicitous, power mongering, manipulators either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Damn, she resigned? That's a shame
Personally, I'd have paid her $10 million and given her 1600 dollars' worth of donuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. He could coast to victory at this point
though he chooses not to.

I don;t see that as imploding exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama: 1,458 delegates, Clinton: 1,370 delegates. Scoreboard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. 3% difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. 3% in Obama's favor with no way to make it up. Scoreboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. 1221 delegates left. Arithmetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Find a plausible way for her to make up the gap
Here's a link to Slate's delegate calculator. Try to come up with a way for her to catch him.

http://www.slate.com/features/delegatecounter/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. Find a plausible way for him to get a majority that does not involve the supers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. Good -- avoid the question. I'll answer yours.
The plausible scenario is that, while Democrats may be stupid, the supers not suicidal enough to vote against someone who leads the pledged delegates, leads the popular vote, leads in states won, and has never trailed in any of these statistics since day 1.

I'll make it easier for you: come up with a way that Clinton can convince enough superdelegates to go against this math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. If the supers follow the numbers of their own states, she'll win.
The larger the state, the more the supers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #60
71. And if the supers follow the numbers of their own district, she loses
Again, your scenario is not plausible. Very few of the superdelegates are state-wide politicians. Party bosses are going to go with the overall delegate count, like they have in every previous primary. The Congresscritters are going to follow their districts. That leaves you with Governors and Senators (many of whom are already in the Obama camp), and that's not enough.

All of this is assuming that the supers do something radically different from every other primary in history: that they overturn the nominee selected by elected pledged delegates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. I'd rather speculate on the presence of bacteria on Mars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. lol
:spray: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Imploded To A Delegate Lead, Popular Vote Lead, Donation Lead...
I could go on & on but you get the point. Can you say "President Obama"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. 27... the number is 27....
27.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. Most states, most delegates, most money, popular vote.
"Implode" ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hack
Go crawl back under your rock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. LOL!!!
Funniest post of the day. :rofl:

Yes, Obama's campaign is "imploding". Right. You really nailed it there. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
28. Agreed. It is jolly good fun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
36. Mature folks across America will not like seeing a presidental candidate mocked
by the opposition is this fashion.

It will have negitive effects across America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #36
65. you're a fine one to talk about Mocking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
37. keep it up........ya'll are cracking me up
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. my guess is that many women voters will not like this either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. So your point is ... women voters are idiots?
Gee, that actually explains a lot of Clinton campaign tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. no the exact opposite. Too bad you have a reading comprehension problem
So your point is ... women voters are idiots?
Posted by jgraz


Gee, that actually explains a lot of Clinton campaign tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. I have to ask: do you even understand how to properly post to this forum?
You either have meaningless subject lines and no content or meaningless subject lines and a copy-and-paste of the post you're replying to.

You may want to have Jethro explain how that Typewriter/TV thing works.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. Thank yo for your concern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #50
83. If "ignored" is who I think it is
the answer is no. "Ignored" is petulant, bellicose, and is willing to yap incessantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. I actually don't think "ignored" is that bad. He's just a little frustrating sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. I have him on ignore....do ya wonder why?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. thanks. i will also now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #37
75. lay off the crack..
crack kills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefoliateBush Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
39. Monsters
Hitler and Stalin are examples of real-life monsters. For someone who is running on judgement rather than the value of experience, it seems that Obama is showing why he shouldn't be President by associating himself with a top foreign policy advisor who doesn't have the judgement to distinguish between Hillary and Hitler. Or a science advisor who can't answer science questions at a science debate and refers reporters to the Obama web site. Or an economic advisors who creates NAFTA-gate. The office of President is not the place for neophytes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
54. Welcome to DU
Nice to see someone with some sense around here.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
57. Yep
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
49. In sports, the opposing athletes respond to that weak shit by pointing at the scoreboard.
This is me pointing to the scoreboard:



and the Texas caucuses have yet to be tallied.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
53. the quality of posts from both sides has been particularly pungent today
However, I don't think either campaign should be held liable for the numerous rhetorical sins of the psychopaths from both sides who post on GDP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
59. Yeah, he's imploding to the tune of $55 million a month. LOL.
Have you read the news? Hillary can not overcome Obama's popular vote numbers. She can not overcome his super majority of state victories.

$55 Million Dollars!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
61. replace the word implode with "winning" please
damned you shillbots are delusional...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
67. implode my ass. the nation is getting a good look at hillary and her similarities to bush
and the republics mode of campaigning. dems dont like it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
68. Your delusion is amusing
Is Hillary running as a Republican yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
69. Obama is starting to mirror his supporters here on DU. I hope he continues.
It will be fun to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
70. It's just high emotions, I think.
I don't see it in his national campaign, though. I'm not sure it'd be helpful to put forward what's easily seen as "whining" and "playing victim." It can actually convey weakness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
73. he should've hired on mark penn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
78. just as soon as I laugh out loud and spew milk from my nose, I must zap
your sorry ass into IgnoreNation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
82. Better a rank amateur like Ms. Powers, than aides who are rank
like Penn and Wolfson. She made a rookie error. They have squandered the assets of the inevitable candidate in an unbelievably ugly, incompetent manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC