Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

After reading the afternoon updates in all the major newsoutlets..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:49 PM
Original message
After reading the afternoon updates in all the major newsoutlets..
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 03:51 PM by Oleladylib
I REALLY wish Clinton/Obama would meet, settle this and run together..Make up their own minds..and certainly ignore places like DU..where thought processes are limited to the ridiculous. The economic reality is beyond any moves the feds can make and families are going down the tubes fast...The job of the next president/congress borders on nearly impossible..without TOTAL cooperation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe it's time for the super delegates to act in the way they were intended
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 04:06 PM by Benhurst
to do, and rather than take sides at this point, demand Clinton and Obama meet and come to some kind of solution between them. Neither has made the 2025 threshold and neither will. They are both losers under the agreed upon rules for the primary, and it's time for them to stop posturing, curb their gigantic egos, and come to the aid of the country they are supposed to be serving.

If they can't resolve this between themselves, then it's time for the party, through the super delegates, to begin looking for a compromise candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The only solution is for Obama to become the
nominee and for Clinton to go back to the Senate because there is no way she can win. Obama can choose his own running mate. That's his perogative as winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Neither of them is going to win (2025) without the support of the
super delegates, and whichever way that goes, super delegates will be overturing the votes of elected delegates. Obama may end up with a plurality, but he is not going to win without resorting to super delegates any more than Clinton will. They both will come to the end of the primary process having had more Democrats vote against them than for them. Both in terms of the agreed upon rules of the primary will be no less losers than those who have already dropped out.

As to which one if them is more likely to win the general election, that is not proven. Both have considerable handicaps to overcome, both have considerable strengths.

But there is no more reason for one to step down than the other. It's time for them both to put their egos aside and find a compromise which will be in the best interests of the party and the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. One is ahead and the other behind.
If someone is to step down I think the natural order is the guy that's behind resigns. That would be the reason. I'm not asking her to quit but please stop trying to pawn her off on people that want nothing to do with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It hasn't been the tradition in the Democratic party's long tradition
for the candidates who were behind to step down without a fight. Historically, it wasn't over until it was over, and a candidate had secured a majority of the delegates. Candidates coming into the convention with a plurality have gone on to lose the nomination.


When the general election is over, considerable time should be devoted changing the rules for our primary elections.

The caucuses by their very nature are undemocratic. The poor, the disabled, the sick, people with small children, and members of our armed services, to name a few, are discriminated against under them.

The process of allocating delegates is undemocratic, often resulting in the loser getting more than the winner.

Open primaries allow the opposition to participate in and corrupt the process.

There should be runoff elections between the two top candidates if no one is able to secure a majority. That way, no minority candidate would end up with the nomination, having had more Democrats vote against him/her than for him/her.

Super delegates are definitely undemocratic. Their sole function was to put a brake on the democratic process if the party elders felt a mistake was being made. Do we really want them to continue to have such powers?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Enough.
We started this selection process with rules that were agreed to by all parties. Stick to the rules for once. Your candidate agreed in the beginning and now is trying to change the rules on all fronts. The rules don't change in the middle of a race or...it's not a race. Give it a rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. What about "when the general election is over" don't you understand?
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 05:42 PM by Benhurst
Maybe you should reread the post you just irrationally lashed out against.

As for changing the rules, I agree this primary should played out to the end under the rules agreed upon at its beginning. And under the present rules, having a plurality amounts to squat. 2025 is the only number which matters-- ANYTHING less than that is a loss.

As for "my" candidate, the way things are going, I'm going to have to hold my nose to vote for either of the top two contenders, neither of whom is going to obtain a majority of delegates before the convention. The best candidates have left the field long ago, or, perhaps wisely, didn't enter it in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am sorry but the two candidates will take this country
in entirely different directions. I know that you are trying to make peace but you have to know that we turned the corner oh....several days ago. I am certain that you are not suggesting that Hillary drop out because she never will. Never, ever, ever, and her philosophy is entirely different that Obama's. We must have a change from the * doctrine and Obama is the only option on the table. I am sorry. Peace, Kim Hussein
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooBigaTent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. How is Obama going to change from the repuke doctrine when he wants to
include them?

As soon as he is the nominee, he will move even further to the right to attract even more republics. He throws liberals a bone every once in a while now to try and fool us into thinking he is progressive. Once he has the official seal of the nomination, just watch him spew even more of that unity crap. He will have to try and convince America that he is not the crazed liberal the GOP is already painting him as.

For disclosure sake - I have as little faith that Clinton would be anything but the DLC-approved corporatist she clearly is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. To be honest , my original favorite candidate
was weeded out long before I could vote for him. I had to look at the candidates and decide who would bring me the closest to my ideal. I chose Obama and Hillary has not made me sorry for one minute. She defeats herself. How will Obama do in the big city? He is a well educated man, familiar with the Constitution. I think he will respect Americans and return our rights to us and that my friend is worth everything to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. They do each other no good as a ticket
Each of them, no matter which one is the nominee, needs national security weight on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC