|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:44 PM Original message |
Why the Caucus system has to go... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. Have you ever participated in a caucus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. No because I am disabled and can't guarantee that I can get to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
26. Shouldn't be any different than getting to a primary site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. He's one of the lucky ones... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. They shouldn't; our state allowed absentees for shut-ins but again, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #35 |
56. Primaries allow for a long stretch of time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
42. Maine has absentee voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Yaknow all those times people raise a ruckas at polls because someone placed a candiates button... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kukesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Those would be Diebold touch screens. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. the MAIN reason they need to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. You have no idea who I voted for.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. all I know is you fit the profile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. Well then you fit the profile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:10 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. peace WC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:12 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. Thank you.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. It's kind of like 300 here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. Save the Caucus vs Primary talk till after the GE please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Some of us have been talking down about caucuses since 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. I always had a distates for the Caucus system... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Why, it has to be setted at the convention... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Yeah, the superdelegates will have to consider the disproportionate nature of the process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
4. Primaries that Obama won don't count |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. The OP did not say that, please don't lie and distort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. You mean the Clinton team didn't pre-spin an Iowa Caucus loss? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Give me a fucking break.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
38. I understand what you wrote. I couldn't disagree with you more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:23 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. Then disagree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. I'm so tired of pithy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. It's up to the STATES.. we have no national rules about how states select their delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Red states can't afford primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
17. The delegate selection process is controlled by the states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Your state effects the national outcome so yea, I should have a say in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Tough shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:06 PM Original message |
my, my, getting a little too close to the truth for you, eh? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
37. Deleted message |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. heh, heh -- thanks for the kicks -- so the caucus problems can be exposed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #25 |
49. No sour grapes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. The DNC actually controls this process, and they can take caucusing out of their delegation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
19. This is why 56% of Democrats believe PV should be the decider at the DNC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kokonoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
20. Republicans tend not to waste time meeting with democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sorrybushisfromtexas (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
51. Texas Caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
22. Why The Caucus System Has To Go? Because Hillary is LOSING, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Again, you have no idea how I voted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. How come we are only hearing about this now then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I have been calling to rid the party of caucuses and superdelegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. So post it in another forum. It doesn't belong here. And I apologize for generalizing your stance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
46. there is nothing wrong with posting here in this forum. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:26 PM Response to Reply #31 |
50. Excuse me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. absolutely, WC. Seems that some want to shut down discussion on this topic. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
29. I'm certain that if Hillary was winning the caucuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
43. You have no idea who I voted for in my primary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
33. WC, THANK YOU FOR THIS GREAT THREAD AS TO WHY CAUCUSES SHOULD GO! N/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
34. Oh, and WC, people don't like it when you speak the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaspee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
40. I say screw 'em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
45. example of why caucuses have to go -- three precincts' votes won't count in TX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #45 |
54. Classic example.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sorrybushisfromtexas (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #45 |
55. Texas Caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. So, you came prepared. So what? The votes in those 3 precincts won't count. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
58. The TX caucuses need to go because they ARE NOT DEMOCRATIC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
59. only 30000 people showed up to caucus in WA? Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:55 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Check here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. That's the number of state delegates, not the caucus attendance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Those are the caucus goers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 08:01 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Obama had a rally in Seattle that had 21,000 attendees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GalleryGod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
61. It'll be moot in 2012..nobody's running against President Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. A good time to test the fifty state primary system... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
62. Proud to be the fifth rec for the Greatest Page... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:29 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC