|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:47 PM Original message |
Yoohoo Obama supporters.......read this and weep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. And what had HHH been doing during the primaries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:54 PM Original message |
Ok, who, or what, the f is HHH? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
23. Hubert H. Humphrey................. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FARAFIELD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
24. That answers that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. Durned whippersnappers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:08 AM Response to Reply #36 |
43. you gotta love it though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:15 AM Response to Reply #24 |
45. Oh you superior little OIK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
49. Do we also have to identify who the hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. then I don't know why they bother having a primary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasLady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. oh hell, I thought you said sweep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. we suck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
u2spirit (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
5. That was 36 years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. and Hillary has been ignoring and insulting democrats in red/purple states for months now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
7. FORGET THE PRIMARY! SDs SHOULD DECIDE THE NOM. FROM THE START! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. We'll see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medusa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
9. And today those same voters would revolt if they dared try such a thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
10. so the party could avoid a mistake by voters in nominating a candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbonds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. That is also the year that Nixon had his squad messing with our primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
not_too_L8 (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. you sound like you would be happy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamaniac (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
13. Hey leftofcool...super-delegates weren't introduced until the 80s. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmperorHasNoClothes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. Oh, the voters aren't making a mistake. Not this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. That's not quite accurate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. SDs tend to choose insiders over outsiders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
16. The historical basis is the only argument the Clinton camp has left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nitrogenica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
17. Read this and weep? WTF like we're on an emotionmal roller coaster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
18. Many super delegates have to get elected themselves. They will go with Obama out of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
19. Yeah. I remember the nomination of Mondale in '84 too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
20. The same George McGovern Hillary worked for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
21. McGovern's advantage was college age voters who had time to support his campaign. Unfortunately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medusa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
25. The Hillbots are grasping at straws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny Potpie (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
26. So |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
27. The SWOON factor is allready de-flating. SD will go with the safe cand. NOT the risky unknown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny Potpie (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:02 PM Original message |
I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
42. everything will depend on where both sides are come Denver--right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:30 PM Response to Reply #27 |
39. yep, the swoon factory for hilly has gone down the toilet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:06 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Hillary fans do not SWOON----nor do we to be given bottled water in a crowd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
28. Yes! And what a great president Nixon turned out to be! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muntrv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
29. Uh, Chimpy is nowhere near as popular in 08 as Tricky Dick was in 72. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saturday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
30. LOL Good find. You've give BO supporters nightmares. LOL nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adoraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
31. wow, breaking news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
32. I was voting age then, too. Not even close to similar times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
33. Hillary IS McGovern and Mondale! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:39 AM Response to Reply #33 |
48. McGovern was the anti-war candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
34. And Obama is going to lose under those circumstances how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
35. I didn't agree with the "addition" of super delegates then and I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
37. funny isn't it, mcgovern was right about Nam, thousands of more Americans died because he lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:15 AM Response to Reply #37 |
46. that's what I take from what happened. To my mind, the party leaders took the will of the voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:18 AM Response to Reply #37 |
47. Bingo. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
38. The are called "Super Delegates" ...Not STUPID Delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeadEyeDyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
40. where every vote counts but some votes count more than others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
44. "Overriding the will of the people" vs. "Following the rules and not changing them midstream" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
50. waaah waaaah wwaaaaah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:44 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC