Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama to Stiff Arm Michigan and Florida?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:36 PM
Original message
Obama to Stiff Arm Michigan and Florida?
As a presidential candidate, Obama IS willing to disenfranchise millions of voters because he "fears losing" the elections in both states.....Glad he's NOT my choice for president!

"Okay, so we know Obama doesn't care about Florida, because he knows he'll lose that state to McCain, and if there's a re-vote he'll also lose it to Clinton.

That would mean yet another huge swing state in her corner, which Obama can't afford because it further makes the case that Clinton's path to the White House is much better than the crap shoot Obama offers.

As for Michigan, there was a "firehouse primary" floated, but the Obama campaign has evidently nixed it. To make matters worse, Zogby was on CNN recently doubting that either Michigan or Florida should count. Are these guys nuts? The fact is that Obama seems to want to deny both Michigan and Florida voters, which became apparent when James Carville tangled with David Wilhelm on CNN. Jerome agrees, BTD weighs in."


Here are James Carville and Obama advocate David Wilhelm"s discussion on a FL-MI re-vote: Carville with a little arm twisting finally embarrasses the Obama spokesman into acquiesce.. (Thanks James, you got him to agree to a revote on Ntl tv) I'm sure the Fl and MI voters just let out a big sigh of relief.

CARVILLE: We’ll raise it (ph). We’ll raise — we’ll put up $15 million. I’ll guarantee $15 million and have the Obama people put up $15 million. And let’s go to the polls come on June 7th. I’ve got fundraisers that are lined up ready to go. I think the Democratic party is going to look absolutely absurd if they don’t have primaries and let these people in Florida and Michigan vote. Again, I tell you what, they’re going to take (INAUDIBLE) to the general election if we don’t do it.

WILHELM: Well, this — you know, ultimately, I don’t think this is up to the campaigns. I think this is …

CARVILLE: Sure it is.

WILHELM: …up to Chairman Dean — the campaigns are part of the discussion, but it’s up to the people of Michigan, the state party of Michigan, the National Party, the state party of Florida, and I’m sure we can all …

CARVILLE: No, David, David, this is …

WILHELM: …(INAUDIBLE) let’s go, we — all we want to do is know what the rules are, play by the rules.

CARVILLE: No, the rules are these campaigns we can put on a primary. I just love Florida. Every person that I talk to in Florida wants to participate in this process. It’s been racked by the subprime crisis and foreclosures. Look at Michigan. We’re going to say (ph) we got rules here and we’re going to have some kind of cockamamie (ph) thing, or we can go and have a primary and let these people weigh in. This is the United States of America. Let people vote.

WILHELM: We have nothing to fear from a primary if that comes to it. Let’s talk have the debate, let’s talk about the economic issues that matter.

CARVILLE: Good, right, I agree.

WILHELM: I’m in total agreement.

CARVILLE: I’ll pledge $15 million.

WILHELM: I am praying and hopeful that we can figure out a way to get this to happen.

CARVILLE: It’s easy, it’s easy. Print some ballots, let’s raise some money and let’s get going and tell this guy in Florida, I don’t have any voting machines, then get some people in and count. Say here’s one ballot here, one ballot there and count them. That’s the way they used to do it. We can do that.

BLITZER: So, basically, what the challenge is $15 million — he says the Clinton campaign and their supporters can raise — David, you think the Obama campaign can raise $15 million? You got $30 million. That’s more than enough to handle new primaries in both Michigan and Florida.

WILHELM: I’m not here today — I’m sitting here in Columbus, Ohio. I think that this is something that can get worked out, that will get worked out. I think the state party and the National Party need to come together. I’d be a little suspicious of the various attitudes of the campaigns on this. This needs to be done in a judicious, mindful way that is fair for all parties

BLITZER: But you know, but David, let me interrupt — David, let me interrupt because Howard Dean says he’s ready to oversee a new primary in both states. He just doesn’t want to pay for it. The governors of Florida and Michigan say they’re ready to see new primaries, but they don’t want the taxpayers in those two states to pay for it. So, James has just come up with a proposal whereby individual supporters of your campaign, supporters of Hillary Clinton’s campaign say, you know what, we’ll come up with the money and we can organize this.

WILHELM: Well, I guess that would be one of the options on the table that needs to be worked out in conjunction with the national party and the state parties. I — I don’t think the right place to hammer this out is on your show here today. But I think it’s one of the options.No one has — I — the attitude of our campaign from day one has been to play by the rules, whatever the rules are. The last I heard from Senator Clinton’s campaign was that they were insisting on the seating of the delegation that was not elected several months ago.

CARVILLE: No, David. Listen to what I’m saying.

WILHELM: So what are we talking about here?

CARVILLE: Listen to what I’m saying.

WILHELM: And –

CARVILLE: I — Wolf, can I — is it all right if I say — Very simple thing. I have talked to people today that are ready to go. We put up $15 million, Senator Obama puts up $15 million. We go to post and we let Democratic voters in Florida and Michigan decide this thing.

We don’t need a backroom negotiation. We need sunshine. We need to somehow the world that the Democratic Party is ready to go. And we can do this. In a country this rich, you’re going to tell me that we’re going to exclude people from Florida and Michigan from participating in this most important election in history?


WILHELM: I want every state to be a participant in this process and to let the process play out. And we are more than happy, I am sure as a campaign, to sit down with the people of — and the Democratic leadership of both states and the national party and help try to figure this thing out.

CARVILLE: But –

(CROSSTALK)

WILHELM: I’m thrilled — I am thrilled if today we’re finally getting off this notion that has been pressed by Senator Clinton’s campaign that we would try to — that they would try to seat the delegation that was elected contrary to the rules of the party –

CARVILLE: David, David, listen. I’ve talked to –

WILHELM: — and where no one campaigned. So –

CARVILLE: I have talked to some of the biggest fundraisers that we have. They are ready to go. They don’t want — they don’t want people in Florida who are being hit left and right by policies of administration, their mortgages are being foreclosed.

People in Michigan have been dismayed. We don’t want to deny these people the right to vote or participate. You have $55 million, give me $15 million, get some skin in this game and let’s go to post and have a debate and talk about it.

WILHELM: Every — fine. Every step of the way that has been what Senator Obama’s campaign has tried to do.(...uh, huh!)

CARVILLE: Well then we’ve got your $15 million.

WILHELM: Let’s figure it out. We’re not going to figure it out on the show today. That sounds like a reasonable position. Let’s go. Let’s work with the leadership of the state. Let’s work with the leadership of the national party and God willing we will find a solution that makes sense and can allow these votes to count in a fair way.

http://www.taylormarsh.com/


...Special Thanks to Taylor Marsh for getting the Truth out there everyday!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Show me the $$$$!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. He'll go along with it if there is compromise. Hillary wants it her way
or the highway. It's not up to the candidates to decide, it's between the the Democratic Party and the states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Read the OP.. Hillary has challanged the Obama Campign to put up half the $$$
Thats not fair in your book? Obama would just as soon have FL and MI disenfranchised and NOT count towards the nomination..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. It's not so much a matter of money, but a matter of format.
I think when that is agreed to, the money will be forthcoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
51. Then you can tell the voters of FL and MI
that they don't get to vote, or that their votes don't count, because of the FORMAT.

How totally fucking lame. The voters will remember.

The Obama guy was totally back on his heels in this argument. Carville said we're ready to go and we'll put up $15 million. Obama got outmaneuvered yet again. A total fucking rookie mistake.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. Ickes to Blame, HIS OWN WORDS HE VOTED FOR THOSE RULES AND SANCTIONS:

Clinton Aide Wants Mich., Fla. Delegates

Sat Feb 16, 2008

WASHINGTON — Harold Ickes, a top adviser to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign
who voted for Democratic Party rules that stripped Michigan and Florida of their delegates,

now is arguing against the very penalty he helped pass.

In a conference call Saturday, the longtime Democratic Party member contended the DNC should reconsider
its tough sanctions on the two states, which held early contests in violation of party rules.
He said millions of voters in Michigan and Florida would be otherwise disenfranchised —
before acknowledging moments later that he had favored the sanctions.

Ickes explained that his different position essentially is due to the different hats he wears
as both a DNC member and a Clinton adviser in charge of delegate counting.
Clinton won the primary vote in Michigan and Florida, and now she wants those votes to count.

"There's been no change," Ickes said. "I was not acting as an agent of Mrs. Clinton.
We had promulgated rules and those rules said the timing provision ...
provides for certain sanctions, automatic sanctions as a matter of fact, if a state such as Michigan or Florida violates those timing provisions."

"With respect to the stripping, I voted as a member of the Democratic National Committee. Those were our rules and I felt I had an obligation to enforce them," he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #51
68. It isn't decided yet. Take a pill and chill. This isn't a matter to be
decided between James Carville and the Obama campaign. It's being discussed by the states and DNC. Obama has no intention of disenfranchising anyone, but why on earth should Queen Hillary have things precisely her way? If she can't compromise in some way on this, how can we expect she might be able to work with the opposition, as she claims she's so wonderful at doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. The issue is nearly dead.
Go ask Hillary why she refuses to support the idea of the mail-in vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
45. Hillary's campaign is ready to put up the money for a legitimate Primary
why is Obama afraid and dragging his feet on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Probably. He's VERY good at "going along" with things; that's literally his leitmotif
It will be very interesting how this ugly mess sorts out. If the choice is between seating Florida as-is or having a re-vote and he pulls for the latter, he'll be seen as playing games. If he contests seating Michigan as-is in favor of a re-vote, he won't--and shouldn't--take too much heat.

If he abides by the decision of the party, that will serve him well, but if he exerts influence, he could take some hits for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hell-bent Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
60. Oh sure,
I'll bet the Obama people want another caucus in both states. Let's see, let's hold it during working hours like they did in numerous states,eh. Perhaps we can have some turn outs similar to what we had in Wyoming,eh. Send out a ballot by mail to every registered Democrat and let the chips fall where they may. No fucking caucuses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. David Wilhelm does nor have the authority to make a multi-million committment...
..without the authoriztion of the campaign. That is why he was hesitant. And that's all that was happening in that interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. If Obama walks into the nomination without counting votes in FL and MI
there will be a groundswell like the DNC has never seen.

You cannot give the election to someone when two very large states have not spoken.

The only person who benefits by not counting these votes in one way or another is Barack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yeah, a lot of outrage over not certifying a vote with only one name on the ballot- Stalin would be
outraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I scaredy cat Obama doesn't agree to new votes, you can count on it Alhena! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jillian Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. That is why the majority of Democrats are calling for a revote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. For the 15 thousandth time----there was NOT ONLY one name on the Dem ballot
And of course, you'll respond that there was only one credible name on the ballot, meaning Clinton and then that sort of defeats all the arguments...

Obama has not even campaigned in Michigan---not so much as a name on the ballot and McCain won the state!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Your candidate does not want a re-vote there, why? If he doesn't run
a fair campaign there, how do you expect him to win the nomination.

He will not win the nomination by discounting millions of voters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. What makes you think I have a pick dear? Afterall, I'm from MI, our votes don't count.
I can wait for the GE and so far as I know, the Democratic party has given thousands of residents in MI the perfect excuse to potentially have three candidates to choose from, not just two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Well, you seem to think that I want to vote in MI to stand as is. I have been on record
many times, wanting a re-vote.

The only unfairness in this, besides the voters, is the unfairness to Hillary. Obama cannont claim victory when two of the largest states in America have not had their votes counted. It is unfair to the process and to Hillary to just discount those two states and claim victory.

That is the point I am trying to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. My original post was in response to Alhena. Then you offered your
opinion on my "candidate" as if you have a crystal ball. Not everyone here has decided Mass, and I am one of them. So far, neither campaign has won me over and certainly not the Howard Dean camp.

But I can swear to this---no Dem candidate will take Michigan in the GE if something is not done about this bullshit about not seating Michigan delegates. People here voted for McCain as a protest to the Dem. party and they will do it again.

The whole argument about having a re-do is pointless, there is not enough time. If people truly researched this whole thing they would learn that it began with national politics and it will end with national politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. I'm confused then. Maybe I originally replied to the wrong person.
pama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Well, now that's something I can get behind---well over half this board is confused
on the issue of Fl. and Mich.

:) Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. All the candidates were on the Florida ballot. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hell-bent Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
65. And, Obama broke the "rules"
by running an ad on MSNBC that I viewed here in central Florida numerous times. Doesn't this man play by the rules? How can the Messiah sin like that? Where was KO's outrage? WTF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Yeah? Well that works both ways, dear.
You can't just give hilly the delegates from two elections which were not legal vehicles for selecting delegates. There will be a groundswell like YOU have never seen if that happens. God, I hate Florida. What a cesspool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
52. Can we assume you're speaking for the Obama campaign?
Because Floridians would LOVE to know that.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. that is disgusting mass to do this to obama. cheap dirty corupt politics to win. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
53. Yes, totally cheap, dirty, corrupt, disgusting politics
TO THINK THAT THE VOTES OF TWO HUGE STATES SHOULD HAVE A SAY IN THE NOMINATION!

Oh, the humanity!!

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. Their party leaders could have backed down
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 03:34 PM by wileedog
and voted when they were supposed to.

They didn't.

When someone robs a bank, do we just let them out of jail after a couple of days because its "not fair" to lock them up for so long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Get real. Nobody robbed a bank or violated any LAWS.
The Obama campaign wants to punish the VOTERS of FL and MI because of decisions that the voters had no part of. Keep on going with that position. The VOTERS of FL and MI will remember that in the fall.

Crying about the rules is a lame argument, but it's all Obama has. And it's a weak position.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #53
71. that isnt what it is about. that is to play on emotion to win. it is wrong. n/t
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 05:23 PM by seabeyond
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Where was the groundswell last year or in Jan?
When everyone was TOLD that MI and FL were NOT VOTING this year.

This isn't exactly recent news...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilyWondr Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
43. The recent part is that
HRC did not close all of the other candidates out on Super Tuesday.

When FL and MI moved their primary they all thought HRC would have the nomination on Super Tuesday and they figured that they wanted to get their states in on the $$ before ST even if it meant losing their delegates at the convention.

They didn't care about losing their delegates because they thought HRC would have more than enough by the convention because no one else would be in the race after ST.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. esp since Fla voted for hillary, that mean Obama will have a tough time winning FLA in the GE....
DUMB. let's not find this out the hard way please, seat the votes or let them re-vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
50. Hillary wants to POACH for DELEGATES
that seems fair :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. If hillary and her minions want another do over then they should
pay for it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The reason for a do over isn't to satisfy Hillary..
If it were, I could see your point. Otherwise address the issue in it's entirety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
69. She wants it as political mileage.
Didn't she refuse a do-over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. It would be nice if people read the topic for discussion..
before asking dumb questions..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Oh please, Carville and Marsh- utter filth the both of them.
And Wilhelm did not say no, it's hilly who's said no to a revote in FL and I believe also to a revote in MI. Something will be worked out, but it's not going to be what dear hilly wants- and we all know what that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Great - let's waste $30M that could be spent in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. It's worth the 30 mil to keep our democracy. Everyone should have
the right to vote. I'm from IL and I'm a big Obama supporter. But, our country comes first even tho he might lose some delegates he needs to support the right for all Americans to vote in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. They broke the rules
They were told by Dean exactly what was going to happen and they did it anyway.

Even a Democracy needs RULES.

Again, the time for this argument was before a single vote was cast not now that there are fake "results" everyone is pointing to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TAWS Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Yes, people are starving but let's use $30 million to decide who gets a few more delegates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. public financed elections are the only way to fix that problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
54. Then Obama should take all those millions he's raised for the campaign
And feed the poor with it.

How much money has Obama spent already?????

That's just about the lamest argument I've heard yet in GD/P.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Better yet...let's nominate either candidate who haven't even campaigned in Michigan
to win the GE.

Yeah, that'll work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
57. Hillary is fragging Obama and DNC so McCain can win, and she runs in 2012
thats the deal.

Gramps will get too senile for a re-run in 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
63. It is less of a waste than advertising...
If you allow these people to have a say now, they'll be incredibly supportive of the Democratic Party in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jillian Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. What gets me is how his followers say Hillary talks about states that don't count!
Hello? What are Florida and Michigan, if not states, Mr. Obama?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. Obama is not enforcing this
The DNC is.

Hillary AGREED to this is January, so she was just as willing to disenfranchise two states several months ago when she thought she was 'inevitable'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jillian Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
67. She did not campaign in either state, same as Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. obama has nothing to do with it. cheap dirty politics from hillary.
so when obama becomes presidential candidate we can lose votes cause hiilary has pinned this on obama for not letting her cheat when he did not have anything to do with it. more trash to disgust the voters so we will never be able to respect this woman, all in the name to win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. k&r
thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. Guaranteed: He will lose the GE without them
In November, its the voters who will decide who is president, not Obama or his campaign. I realize the guy has a big ego, but he's beginning to appear delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
26. Ok. I'm back. and I'm pissed off at you, Tellurian
GET THEE BACK TO THE HILLARYIS44.ORG CHAMBER!

*plonk*

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
48. Hawkeye...leave your ego on your keyboard..
If all you've got to say as a response is lashing out at His44.. Let me tell you something. You can continue to cry and bellyache until the cows come home. Until you grow up and post like a mature adult with a response to the issue in the OP; this conversation is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. K&R thought both states VOTED. Seat the delegates and NO RE~VOTE.
Hillary won fair and square and Obama lost. Obama was even stupid enough to have REMOVED his name from the Michigan ballot. That shows his real experience.

Thanks for posting this though, showcases the lies by the CULTObama.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. he's smart, he knew he would lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. It's tough to put Humpty-Dumpty together again. Same for the FUBARs that FL and MI are.
You cannot un-ring a bell!

The Democratic Party insiders, state and national, engaged in power plays. The "rules" that grant a perpetual PRIVILEGE to two states in selecting a nominee are fundamentally flawed from an ethical perspective. At the same time, the draconian penalties imposed on the VOTERS of Michigan and Florida for the FUBAR by party insiders are also unfair and antidemocratic.

There's no way to un-ring that bell. The pretense that there is is solely and completely self-centered. It's a position that makes it "about me" rather than "about the people" and betrays the hypocrisy of at least one of the candidates - whose name I won't mention. (Her supporters would be in disagreement, of course.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
40. Hillary wants all the votes to count,.....in Ohio at least?
she will not disinfranchise any voter who votes for her....

Besides law and order is a stupid way to run a country - rules were made to be broken. Look at Bush with his signing statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Agreed, and the voting electorate is neither the "ring" of a bell or Humpty Dumpty..
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 02:40 PM by Tellurian
If we want out votes to count, it is incumbent on us more than ever, to "fight" for that vote, when it's been relegated to the acceptance of disenfranchisement by some fair-weather egotistical politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
46. hehheh hehheh you said stiff. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
47. Obama created this situation? No. So stop with the bullshit!
(how many times am I going to have to post this today?!!?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
49. Maybe MI and FL should have followed the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
55. For the record
When on the rules committee, Clinton adviser Harold Ickes votes to punish FL and MI by stripping them of their electoral votes.

Obama is being blamed, why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
61. i live in MI, if you seat the delegates you Disenfranchise the people who understood the rules
that were in place at the time




Hillary would disenfranchise the voters of 2 states for her own political gain. Hell, after voting for a war for political gain why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
62. Seems like a fair offer to me. Michigan and Florida can't be dissed. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
64. What is really funny....
Is that the "popular vote" argument to get super delegates sort of disenfranchises Caucus states.

The "only 15 states are important argument" sort of disenfranchises the other 35.

Is it too much to ask for consistency out of the Clinton camp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
66. Who needs FL and MI? O's going to win with UT and WY!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. Gee, thanks for the reminder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC