Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ed Rendell Comments on MTP: Read it and Weep. This Is What Its Come Down To

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:41 PM
Original message
Ed Rendell Comments on MTP: Read it and Weep. This Is What Its Come Down To
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 04:53 PM by K Gardner
http://thepeoplesplatform.blogspot.com/2008/03/meet-press-transcript-obama-clinton.html

MR. RUSSERT: Should the candidate who has the most elected delegates be the nominee?

FMR. SEN. DASCHLE: Absolutely. I don't see how we could possibly do anything other than respect the will of the people who have voted in caucus and primary states all over the country. And what it would say to the world, to the country that we'd overturn the verdict of those, of those elections would be travesty for, for the party and for the country.

<...>MR. RUSSERT: Governor Rendell, if, in fact, Barack Obama goes to the convention in Colorado in August with the most elected delegates, having won more contests and a higher popular vote, the cumulative vote, could he be denied the nomination?

GOV. RENDELL: Well, sure, Tim,
because, number one, Hillary Clinton has won states with about 260 electoral votes. Barack Obama has won states with about 190. And we decide the presidency not by a popular vote, we decide it by the electoral vote. And the traditional role of the superdelegates is to determine who's going to be our strongest candidate. Tim, you and I have been doing this for a long time, as Tom has, and we know the big four in any presidential election recently are Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida and Michigan. And in all four of those states--Pennsylvania hasn't voted yet, but I assume we're going to do real well--Hillary Clinton will have taken those states, if it--she takes Pennsylvania, and will have taken them by significant majorities. She's clearly the strongest candidate in the states that Democrats must win to have a chance. Look, it's great that Barack Obama is doing wonderfully well in Wyoming and Utah and, and places like that, but there's no chance we're going to carry those states. Whether he gets 44 percent as opposed to 39 percent doesn't matter, but we're not going to carry those states. We do have a chance to carry the big four. We've got to in three of the big four. Hillary Clinton's the strongest candidate to do that. That's been proven by the voters in the--those states and hopefully by Pennsylvania as well.

MR. RUSSERT: But, Governor, you're counting Florida when, in fact, the candidates did not campaign in Florida. So you--are you suggesting Hillary Clinton won?

GOV. RENDELL: Oh, there's no question. In an even playing field, nobody campaigned, 1.7 million Floridians voted, and she won by 17 percent. But I have a suggestion, if you don't like that, Tim, or if Tom doesn't like that, let's revote in Michigan and Florida. Let's end all the suspense. If our campaign is wrong and we are not going to be the strongest in those states, let the voters choose it. And Tom always talks about--the Obama folks talk about undemocratic. How can the Democratic Party go to Denver and deny the people of Michigan and Florida, two crucial states, a voice in this, in this nominating process? Makes no sense at all. Let's revote, and let's see how we do.

MR. RUSSERT: But in Michigan, you'll acknowledge that you have said repeatedly that the Clinton campaign cannot make the statement that they won Michigan.

GOV. RENDELL: Right. Which is why I'm calling for a revote.

<snip> more outrage at link

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23546011/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ed Rendell Waxes Poetic: "Caucuses are Undemocratic"....
MR. RUSSERT: Would you accept the caucus in Michigan?

GOV. RENDELL: No. Caucuses are undemocratic. That's another thing. We talk about the superdelegates being undemocratic. If you're a caucus, older people can't vote, older people who vote by absentee ballot. There's no absentee ballots in a caucus. Tim, if you're a shift worker and a lot of our workers, because they're low-income workers, are shift workers, you can't vote in a caucus. So we want primaries. That's the way we elect presidents. We don't have caucuses to elect presidents in the fall. Let's have a primary. Let's decide this. Let's hear from the Obama campaign about a revote in Florida and Michigan.

MR. RUSSERT: So the Iowa caucus, the Nevada caucus were undemocratic.

GOV. RENDELL: Undemocratic compared to primaries, yes.

MR. RUSSERT: Senator...

GOV. RENDELL: Absolutely.

MR. RUSSERT: Senator...

GOV. RENDELL: Tim, do you believe, do you believe older people should have the right to vote? They can't in a caucus because they can't get out of the house. So you're disenfranchising some of the most important voters in the fall election. How about that shift worker who works 4 to 12? He can't vote. He might really want to vote, but he can't.

<...>MR. RUSSERT: Senator Daschle, a proposal from the Clinton campaign to have new primaries in Florida, in Michigan, paid for by private donors.

FMR. SEN. DASCHLE: Well, Tim, first of all I think it'll come as a real shock to Iowa and to Nevada and to many other states that they don't have a democratic process. I think that it's very democratic, and we saw yesterday in Wyoming we had a lot of seniors and older people to participate. People from all walks. They were participating in unprecedented numbers, so I, I don't concede that point at all. But let me just say...

GOV. RENDELL: What about shift workers, Tom? What about shift workers and people who can't get out of their homes?

FMR. SEN. DASCHLE: Shift workers, too, Ed. Absolutely.

GOV. RENDELL: What about people who can't get out of their homes?

FMR. SEN. DASCHLE: No, I think--I think everybody--we'll accommodate. We'll accommodate them.

GOV. RENDELL: You can't. There's no absentee ballots in caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Did you see Levin on This Week? Oye.
From one side of his mouth he claims he wants his constituents in MI heard, yet spewing from the other side is his notion that the MI votes should remain as is. Doesn't once address those who voted non-committed. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. No.. after Rendell I turned the TV off and haven't turned it back on. I can't
take six weeks of this, much less now until August. It simply has to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I thought he did not endorse anyone
Did he? I did not see him, by the way, what argument could he give for the MI to stay as is short of "I fucked up"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Maybe he hasn't. I thought I had heard or read
he supports Clinton; today, he sure sounded like it, but I don't have proof.

He accepted no responsibility for what has happened in MI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. He has...
He is a super-delegate and has already pledged his support.

http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-list.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Thank you for that-I thought so. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I love Tom Dascle. I miss him in the Senate-- Gov. Rendell however, not so much.
Too bad because I had a lot of respect for Rendell previously but this morning, he lost all credibility. What is it that happens to people like him (and Debbie Wasserman Schultz) who used to be fair minded, Democratic party elected officials that are now so willing to disenfranchise millions of votes so that their candidate can win a nomination by cheating? Insulting the caucus process and the states that hold them (which I happen to think is terrific- talk about democracy in action and empowering voters to really feel like they are involved in the process)- shame on you Gov. Rendell.

On another note, what about Tom Daschile as VP for Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Calling Ed Rendell
We have a caucus; we offer absentee ballots; we don't have the big bucks to run a primary. Maybe PA should put upt the cash for Maine to join in his brand of Democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. How in the same hell did Rendell become Governor?
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 05:01 PM by 0007
Is he a male Monica Lewinsky on the loose, or something of that nature? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Where is his logic?
What states would HRC carry that Obama won't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Arkansas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yeah, she'll be campaigning for
mccain there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. So the Clintons are going to pull a switcheroo between delegates and electorial votes
Nothing says corruption quite like the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. "Nothing says corruption quite like the Clintons" = TShirt of the Year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Sounds like Calvinball to me
1.2. Any player may declare a new rule at any point in the game (Figure 1.2). The player may do this audibly or silently depending on what zone (Refer to Rule 1.5) the player is in.

http://www.simplych.com/cb_rules.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fuck Ed Rendell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noel711 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rendell has lost all political credibility....
He has no future in politics. But maybe he knows that,
not being about to run again as governor, so he'll
spend his time as houseboy for Hillary..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is wonderful.
If he keeps this shit up, perhaps we'll be able to rid ourselves of him as well as the Clintons!

We can make it a full DLC-ectomy.

Mmm, I can't wait to hear how these comments go over with Pennsylvanians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. DLC-ectomy
Increasingly, this is becoming more and more the entire point of this election to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. Makes perfect logical sense
.....you elect the candidate that you feel has the best chance to win. I understand this to be their mission. It takes grown-ups to make hard decisions like these and the SDs were appointed for just that reason. In the absence of a clear winner in the pledged delegate race, these individuals will decide who the nominee will be. We can gripe and bitch about it all day, but that is what it comes down to, and there is absolutely nothing anyone can do about it. They are not bound by anything, delegate count, popular vote, public sentiment....nothing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Exactly. Having lived through McGovern I wouldn't have it...
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 05:48 PM by greyghost
any other way.

Don't like it? Then change the constitution, that's what it comes down to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. Last time the "grown-ups" decided we got Mondale.
Granted, any Dem would have had a tough time against Reagan, but surely we could have done better than a 49 state landslide loss, dontcha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. Watched it. Loved it!
Especially the following:

MR. RUSSERT: Let's go right to it. Here are the latest delegate counts according to NBC News. Obama, elected delegates, 1374; Clinton, 1232. That's an Obama lead of 142. Superdelegates: Obama, 215; Clinton, 254. Since Super Tuesday Obama has gained 45 elected delegates, Clinton has lost six. Thus far, total contests, Obama has won 27; Clinton, 14. The popular vote is tight: Obama, 13.1 million; Clinton 12.5 million. That's 49-to-47.

And, it's only going to get better!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. How many sides of his mouth does Rendell have anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. His argument is mind-bending and awkward, at best.
Never underestimate the ability of Ed Rendell to make a complete ass out of himself on national television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Actually, that's exactly how the game is played. Welcome to
presidential politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Another way of practicing presidential politics...
.. is to use condescension in the face of criticism. You really don't know me at all, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. One can only read and reply to the posts as written.
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 11:10 PM by greyghost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Well, if you'd spend a bit of time getting to know people before insulting them,
you'd know that Jen is one of our most outspoken progressive voices here and has a very loyal following. She is respected among her peers, her advice and commentary is sought after and she works tirelessly for the Party. Nuff said. You really should apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. No, because quite frankly Rendall explained his position VERY
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 11:32 PM by greyghost
clearly. She was wrong to call him an ass, and I called her on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. Defend Ed all you'd like
He's was an outspoken asshat today. He has been before. He likely will be again.

Since when did Ed Rendell become a sacred cow of the Democratic Party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. He has every right to express his opinion without being called an
ass. He's a fellow Democratic and deserves that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sorrybushisfromtexas Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. Gov. Ed Rendell
If Obama goes to the Convention with the lead in popular votes, pledged delegates and number of states won and it is turned over by superdelegates to Hillary you will see millions of new voters, blacks, and Obama supporters not vote Democrat in the fall. I expect it would be the same if Hillary went in with the popular vote lead, pledged vote lead, and number of states won. You are disenfranchising millions of people. I myself would simply not vote for president.
We would simply be going back to party politics in the past. I also suspect that McCain would win in a cakewalk. It is not that Hillary would win the nominations, it would be how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. What happened to playing by the rules?
You guys say MI and Fla can't be seated because of the rules. Well, these are rules too, and none of us wants the rules broken, do we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. It'd be the Dem party's suicide
WILL NOT HAPPEN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. Forgive me WHILE I feign s-u-r-p-r-i-s-e

POLITICIANS RIG ELECTIONS TO WIN!
OH, MY!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
29. K&R. It was clear who the dirty player was and who the clean player was today...
Daschle said he'd vote for Hillary if SHE ended up having the most elected delegates and Rendell said he wouldn't do the same if it was Obama. AND Rendell had to explain his and Hillary's own comments about how Obama is NOT ready to be the CIC yet he'd be a GREAT VP (a heartbeat away from the presidency). Like supporter like candidate. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
30. But Hillary *herself *has said that she is absolutely *against*
allowing a revote in either state--probably because she knows she would lose a real vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
33. If reporters hadn't coddled him
like a little fluffy toy for half the campaign season, he wouldn't even be a blip on the radar screen now.

He never had an original thought in his life and doesn't have the credentials to be a governor. The press has just come out of their coma and he's going down.

There will be a former first lady giving the acceptance speech at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. The press has indeed FINALLY woken up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Maybe you two should get a room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. We'll need more then that after this week. I'm looking into a...
convention hotel in Vegas to accommodate the crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. If so
"There will be a former first lady giving the acceptance speech at the convention."

Then there will be a half filled room she is giving it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Don't think for a NY minute that the DNC won't have the numbers to back
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 11:37 PM by greyghost
their play. I'll vote for who ever they nominate, and millions of Dem's & Indies will join me. It's about taking the WH. PERIOD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
43. Well alright there Govenor.......to have dashle and kerry as his
spokesperson on the sunday shows reminds folks they are both losers.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
44. Clinton "took" MI because it was an "election" straight from the USSR.
Rendell's lying - she didn't take either MI or FL BECAUSE THEY DON'T AND WON'T COUNT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC