Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Just Brilliantly Responded to Clinton's "Offer" of VP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:29 PM
Original message
Obama Just Brilliantly Responded to Clinton's "Offer" of VP
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 01:00 PM by writes3000
It played live on CNN and MSNBC. It was at a town hall in Mississippi.

"I've won twice as many states than Senator Clinton. (huge applause) I've won more of the popular vote than Senator Clinton. (applause) I've won more delegates than Senator Clinton. (applause) Tell me, how is it that the one in second place is offering the VP position to the person in first place. I'm in first place. (huge applause)"

"Make no mistake, I'm not running for Vice President. I'm running for President of the United States of America."

"Back in 1992, Bill Clinton said that the only threshold for a Vice President was that that person had to be ready, if he fell out, to become President on day one. For the last two weeks, their campaign has been claiming that I'm not ready to answer that phone. But now they say I'd make a good VP? They're trying to hoodwink you. They're trying to bamboozle you."

"You ever hear of the Okey doke? (strong laughter) You know the Okey Doke when some one is trying to swindle you (roar of laughter). Well this is like an Okey doke when someone in second place is offering the guy in first place the second place seat (laughter and standing ovation).

He then hammered home his point that you want the person with the best judgment to answer that phone not the person who's been in Washington the longest. "I believe I've shown better judgment than Hillary Clinton. She's gone along with the policies of George Bush..."

Some of the above has been slight paraphrased.

It was awesome!

(Thanks to grantcart for the assist.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Neither can reasonably accept a VP spot at this time.
Not while the outcome is still in doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Certainly Hillary more than Obama though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I would have agreed until OH, TX and RI. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. You sure you mean Texas, which Obama won?
I mean, he did win the delegate total.

Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. She won the primary election and the caucus. ...
... I remind you how big of a deal the O campaign has made of winning "states" however small they are or however unlikely it is that the D.s will win a state in the fall. The popular perception is winning the state = momentum. I hear she's closing the gap in Mississippi. If somehow, she pulls it off (unlikely I know) it will effectively end O's chances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Um, she didn't win the Texas caucus
Technically, no one has, but Obama is expected to win it 60/40.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Oh, they're not done? Okay. I miss understood then. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. BTW, look at this electoral projection and tell me again how Obama's wins in red states don't matter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. Sssssh!
Clinton supporters don't acknowledge caucus results — those only come from "unimportant" states anyway.

Is your state Clinton Approved™?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. So why is she offering it?
To the front runner, no less!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. She isn't. She only dangled the possibility in front of a crowd.
She was suggesting that if people can't decide, then they might get both with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Odd she would "dangle it"...
when he is so "inexperienced".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. Not really. People always vote the top half of the ticket...
...(at least until 2000.) There's nothing wrong with having a less experienced candidate as VP. The real danger for a presidential candidate is picking someone who will be better and illustrate the short-comings of the main candidate. That happened in 1988. Frankly, I thought Gore was more qualified than Bill Clinton in 1992.

Anyway, it is a moot point. She'll pick either Clark or Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Yes, it's a ploy to get more votes for HRC. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. A plot?
:rofl:

I thought the whole idea of an election was to get the most votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. I said it's a ploy, not a plot. A ploy is an English word you know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. interesting that he did not refuse it . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "I'm not running for Vice President."
Pretty much seemed like a refusal to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. don't believe so . . .
no words of refusal there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Well, that's how it's being interpreted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. yep - I understand that
and he is making it clear he is not actively pursuing the VP role now

but he certainly did not say he would refuse it in the future
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. He doesn't want to have that conversation because...
It would give the edge back to Clinton. It means he's thinking about what happens if/when she wins.

And quite frankly, this "offer" from the Clintons isn't real at all. So why should he address it further.

Could he take a different position down the road? Perhaps. But I really, really doubt it. I do understand your point though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. I agree with you. Of course it is a ploy by Hillary - one to deflect her being behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Of course he refused it. He could hardly have been clearer
and he went after her in no uncertain terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. and exactly where did he say - "I do not want it"
he only said he was not running for VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. Do you need it in triplicate on 20lb paper with a seal? Hello? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. don't be ridiculous - I just do not see where he says
"No - I do not want it"

He said he is not running for VP - meaning not actively pursuing it. He never said "NO"

good lord - can we not disagree without getting all huffy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
48. Were you one of the "Gore didn't say he wasn't running, just that he had no plans" people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #48
61. nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. You've got to understand - message transmographication is all the rage on DU
and 1 + 1 = 3, while they're at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm glad he brought up the bamboozling rhetoric. I HATE when Bushes and Clintons depend
on that type of twisting and spinning as it shows no respect for the intelligence of their audience.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. I love when he uses that "hoodwink, bamboozle" line it shows his critics as jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. Exactly - I want a NEW POLITICS where people stop GAMING the audiences and instead
speak to them as CITIZENS deserving of the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. He is sooooo good! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Touche! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. excellent transcription job
My favorite line and a line that will be frequently repeated is the one that said something like, "You ever hear of the Okey doke? (strong laughter) You know the Okey Doke when some one is trying to swindle you (roar of laughter). Well this is like an Okey doke when someone in second place is offering the guy in first place the second place seat (laughter and standing ovation).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. I just added this. Hope you don't mind. I laughed when he said it.
But couldn't get the phrasing right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
46. you got a lot more than I did and my Okey doke wasn't literal but
it got the phrase in. I am begining to think that these guys are holding Obama back because even though he is so good if he is no the news everynight people get used to it. Then they bring him out after a few days and its so refreshing and funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Yep and I think the public is starting to sour on Hillary's constant negativism.
I've been wanting to see him in front of crowds again. I'm glad he waited for that occasion to respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bravo!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yes, he did!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. Damn.
That's what you call "being unambiguous."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
25. No one is saying he'd make a good VP.
That's just a compromise position for 16 years of Democrats in office. But if Obama only wants 4 or 8, have at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. LOL
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 12:42 PM by theredpen
:rofl:

So no one is saying that Obama would be a good VP, but Clinton is picking him anyway? Because there aren't any other Democrats who'd make a good VP?

:rofl:

Does it hurt to twist your brain into positions like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. He needs training. Clinton would choose him for his popularity only.
He's popular, which doesn't necessarily translate into qualified. Can you twist your brain into that, or does it hurt too much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. He has more experience in national office than Bill Clinton did in 1992
I don't have any problem understanding that popular doesn't necessarily translated into qualified.

Wasn't it Bill Clinton (who has fewer qualifications than GHW Bush) the one who said the only qualification you needed to be President was to be elected to the office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #50
63. But aren't VPs supposed to be able to handle the presidency at a moment's notice?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
42. So Clinton would imperil the nation by choosing a poor VP solely for political gain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoMojoMojo Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
56. No thats only to appease Obama Supporters.Wes Clarke is the best qualified
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. and that makes the point that she's not doing what's best for the country
She's just trying to collect Obama voters for her own gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. Obama's got his verbal jiu-jitsu back!
One of his most effective jiu-jitsu throws I've seen is when he deconstructs his opponent's arguments.

Like here. He disassembled Clinton's offer of VP to him, noted that it was inconsistent with her assertion he wasn't ready to be President (if he isn't ready, why would she offer him the VP slot?) and told the audience directly what she was really doing - bamboozling.

Same thing when he deconstructed Clinton's mockery of his message of hope, using lines about how they would have him stew in the Beltway, cook all the hope out of him - told the audience what they really said - a message of disrespect to the people and the very idea of hope, replacing that hope with cynicism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
37. OH SNAP!!!
:rofl:

Man she looks like even more of an idiot now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
44. This will dominate the political news cycle for the day.... See the smoke coming out of Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYDem Observer Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
45. He's Baaaackk!
"Make no mistake, I'm not running for Vice President. I'm running for President of the United States of America."

Lovin it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NEDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
47. Video Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musiclawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
51. This is good.
I'm sure he's received a lot of advice on how to respond. I've written saying that he needs to come out and say that his nomination can only be taken away by blowing up the party, which the DLC would not mind. But the "bamboozle" word is good--it cannotes duplicity and deception. Which is what HRC is all about right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
52. I see a crowd with pitch forks, brooms and torches headed to the Frankinclinton castle.
The pimp monster is going down.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoMojoMojo Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. Bad choice of words.Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
53. Great response!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
55. Here is the youtube footage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mculator Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
57. Brilliant and Obama don't belong in the same sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
59. For the last two weeks, their campaign has been claiming that I'm not ready to answer that phone. "
"But now they say I'd make a good VP?"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVjinx Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
62. Cool. Now she can smile, shrug. and say she offered.
I wonder who she will pick instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC