Moderators - Can we move all the Spitzer related threads out of here?

[democrattotheend]

Spitzer is not running for president and his revelation today has nothing to do with the primaries. The fact that he endorsed Clinton is irrelevant...there's no evidence she knew anything about this or had anything to do with it.

Can we please move all of the Spitzer threads out of here?

[scheming daemons]

1. As long as we can move all the Farrakhan and Rezko threads too....

...


Be consistent.

[DJ13]

5. Farrakhan and Rezko

Yes, if Spitzer goes those need to go too.

[AngryAmish]

2. no

[BeyondGeography]

3. Look, another Spitzer thread

:thumbsup:

[bigtree]

4. seconded. This has nothing to do with the primary

[BuyingThyme]

6. You want to clean up the GDP?

:rofl:

[democrattotheend]

7. I am disturbed by the Obama supporters seeking to capitalize on this

It makes him look bad. This has nothing to do with the presidential primaries and does not belong here.

[BuyingThyme]

9. Is it less significant than Rezko?

[avrdream]

8. YES PLEASE!

Or at least give us back our delete thread option.

[dave123williams]

10. Get a clue; it's a legit sex scandal. Deal with it.

[democrattotheend]

11. But what does it have to do with the primaries?

That's all I am asking.

[dave123williams]

12. This forum is about ALL things political. This qualifies.

Just because you don't like this story sucking the wind out of the room doesn't mean it's not happening. I don't like it either (Spitzer couldn't have had worse timing on this), but in reality who really gives a shit? Two day story, max.

[democrattotheend]

14. I just wanted them to move it out of GD:P

To general discussion or wherever, since it has nothing to do with the presidential primaries.

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

19. no, this forum is for Primaries, other stuff should go in "General"

this forum was created specifically to discuss the primaries.

[dave123williams]

21. If you REALLY think this isn't going to affect the primaries, by all means.

But, you can't be that stupid.

[scheming daemons]

13. It has as much to do with the primaries as Farrakhan.....

Hillary was endorsed by a scoundrel.

Obama was endorsed by a scoundrel.



The big difference is.... Hillary supporters continue to beat Obama over the head with Farrakhan... then turn around and say Spitzer doesn't matter.


Sorry... if you're going to play the "guilt by association" game with Obama, then it opens Hillary up to the same silly charge.

[Debi]

15. Should they be moved to the same place all the Rezko threads are?

oh, wait, that's here in GD-P

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

16. thanks for making this post, you are right, the Spitzer threads don't belong here

I am sorry about his recent trouble, but his problems have nothing to do with the primaries.

In Fact, NY has already held their primary.

[mohc]

17. Or at the very least post them slower

I need ignore thread back.

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

18. kicking AND recommending

I will come back later to see how this thread is going, thanks for starting it.

[endarkenment]

20. Rezko not running for president.

"The fact that he endorsed Clinton is irrelevant" well no it isn't by the bullshit rules already established here for smearing either candidate with anything at all to see if it will stick.