Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Wins Mississippi, But Don't Look for a Fall Repeat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:51 PM
Original message
Obama Wins Mississippi, But Don't Look for a Fall Repeat
http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080312/cm_thenation/45297502

The Nation -- The headline from Barack Obama's win in Mississippi is another good one for the Illinois senator: He paced New York Senator Hillary Clinton by an impressive 58-40 margin, taking a clear majority of the delegates.

Unfortunately, the details behind those numbers are not so good for Obama.

While results from many states have suggested that Obama's candidacy might really be transcending old voting patterns, there is no such suggestion to be found in the results from this corner of the deep south.

Among the 50 percent of Mississippi primary voters identified in exit polls as African Americans, Obama won a striking 90-10 margin.

Among the 48 percent identified as white, Clinton won by an only slightly less striking 74-21 margin. Among the 37 percent of the electorate identified as white protestants, Clinton's margin went to 76-18. Among white over the age of 60 -- who accounted for almost one-fifth of the primary electorate, Clinton was favored 82-16.

These numbers point to a continuing, very real and very serious racial divide in a bellwether state of the old Confederacy. And it should be noted that the divide in Mississippi is similar to the one seen in the neighboring state of Alabama on February 5.

The exit poll data provides little support for the argument that nominating Obama would get Democrats back in the game in the Republican-leaning south this fall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mississippi is not a bellweather state.
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 10:53 PM by NJSecularist
It's actually a state that is so radically different from most other states in the South with its "incredible" racial divide. Not even Tennessee features the type of racial divide that Mississippi features.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Agree
Obama will need to get the traditional blue states plus some swing states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:53 PM
Original message
has any Democrat won Mississippi since 1944?
I don't think even Carter did, did he? The Democrats can win without the Deep South anyways. The South began to realize this in the 1970's, and that's why they came up with Super Tuesday during the party primaries, to combat their declining national importance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Jimmy Carter won it in 1976. Hard to believe isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Mississipi went for Carter in '76.
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 11:54 PM by Spider Jerusalem
And Adlai Stevenson in '52 and '56. Apart from that, it went to Strom Thurmond in '48, Harry Byrd in '60, Goldwater in '64, Wallace in '68, Nixon in '72, and Republican in every election since 1980.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Carter won Mississippi. in '76. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think any reasonable democrats thought states like Mississippi were in play
However, a southern state like Virginia is definitely in play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is the black vote why he won WY, VT or WI
or any of the other slew of states he has won?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Don't forget WA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Yeah Idaho to
I think my white 72 year old mom voting in coeur d'alene put him over the top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Democrats get to choose our Nominee.
Democrats of every state. And they are choosing Obama. This is the Primary. I don't know anyone who expects and Dem Nominee to win MS in the GE.

THis is a red herring bullshit distraction from Obama thumping HIllary, yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. You think they'd vote for HILLARY?
On the other hand, Obama stands a very good chance of getting elected in some of the "purple" states that he has carried as well as the bluer states that went for hillarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. 45% of the state is black... all Obama needs is 25% of whites to defeat McCain....
Mississippi is *IN PLAY* if Obama is the Nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. sorry you are delusional
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 10:56 PM by Herman Munster
in a general election, I'd be surprised if Obama breaks double digits in the white vote in MS when all the republicans come out to vote for real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. He got 27% of white Democrats.... some of the 72% that went for Hillary will go for him......
...and black registrations will be through the roof.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. The Democrats are lucky to get 15% white support
I don't think you understand... white democrats are a small portion of the white electorate in Mississippi. The majority of them are Republican. And overall, election after election, 90% of whites vote Republican.

There is absolutely no way any Democrat wins Mississippi, and for you to try to say otherwise is just wishful thinking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. AND.....?
are you saying Hillary would win? GO ahead and say she will, with a straight face. Thats like saying Huckabee did poorer with WHITE VOTERS in California. Neither could win California
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
35. No way either Obama or Clinton would win MS.
No. freakin'. way.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. First of all, it is 38%. Secondly, we already get 90% of the black vote in MS.
Thirdly, we typically only get 15% of the white vote. How will Obama improve that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. You are wrong.
In 2004, they consisted of 35% of the population. And Kerry won them 90-10.

But whites consist of 65% of the population and Bush won them by an equal margin.

There is absolutely no way Mississippi is in play for any Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Seeing as how the last time we won it was in '76, we do not/did not
expect to win it in the GE.. There just are not enough dems in the state to counteract the bigoted republicans....yet

As the old die-hard "southern heritage" people leave the planet , and younger people become the largest demographic, that could change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Help me out here: When you guys cite all the statistics about racist whites
what is it that you want us to do? To dump Obama to appease racists? What do you hope to accomplish with your posts? Honestly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrandmaJones7 Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Racists?!?
Would you PLEASE stop using that word?!?!? Look - it was only ONE comment by a single member of Hillary's staff - that's it.

Those of you who keep bringing it up remind me of Senator McCarthy and his famous witch hunt - only this time its not the communists being hunted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. UMMM
did anyone here think that a DEM would win MS? Your are not trying to say that HIllary would win MIssissippi? Ill make you a bet if you are willling. Ill bet you $100 that Hillary wouldnt win Arkansas if she was the nominee and Ill throw in that she can get even 45% of the vote in MS. What a misleading post headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. I call BS With his votes and the sane Hillary supporters, he wins Miss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerfectSage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. The south won't vote for a Munster. lol
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 11:03 PM by PerfectSage
The Nation -- The headline from Barack Obama's win in Mississippi is another good one for the Illinois senator: He paced New York Senator Munster by an impressive 58-40 margin, taking a clear majority of the delegates.

Unfortunately, the details behind those numbers are not so good for Obama.

While results from many states have suggested that Obama's candidacy might really be transcending old voting patterns, there is no such suggestion to be found in the results from this corner of the deep south.

Among the 50 percent of Mississippi primary voters identified in exit polls as African Americans, Obama won a striking 90-10 margin.

Among the 48 percent identified as white, Munster won by an only slightly less striking 74-21 margin. Among the 37 percent of the electorate identified as white protestants, Munster's margin went to 76-18. Among white over the age of 60 -- who accounted for almost one-fifth of the primary electorate, Munster was favored 82-16.

These numbers point to a continuing, very real and very serious racial divide in a bellwether state of the old Confederacy. And it should be noted that the divide in Mississippi is similar to the one seen in the neighboring state of Alabama on February 5.

The exit poll data provides little support for the argument that nominating Obama would get Democrats back in the game in the Republican-leaning south this fall.




?t=1205294207
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. Axlerod himself said Obama would win the South
Now Obamites are acting as if the idea that SuperBama was alleged to have the key to unlocking the South, something no Democrat who was not from the South has done since 1964, never was floated by the Obama machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Axelrod is delusional. No way Obama (or Hillary for that matter) will win any Southern states.
And if he seriously believes that, I doubt his capacity to run a winning general election campaign this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. That's what makes Obama different than your Establishment candidate
Obama will try. He may fail, but he will try and make the Republicans earn those electoral votes.

Hillary will simply write those states off and hand them to Republicans on a silver platter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
28. This race HAS become about race.
Blacks have consistently voted overwhelmingly for Obama and now, at least in MS, whites are doing the same for Hillary.

White backlash???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjnumb9 Donating Member (157 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hmmph, well I live in Tennessee
I can tell you unequivocally that racism is alive and well in a lot of the South, unfortunately. It goes both ways, no doubt. The "racial divide" that this article focuses on will not be nearly as potent in approximately 45 other states, and the fact that the article you posted does not hit on that is ignoring the 500 lb. gorilla in the room.

Also, I wanted to point this out - "Among white over the age of 60 -- who accounted for almost one-fifth of the primary electorate, Clinton was favored 82-16." Hmm. First of all, I didn't know there WERE any white people over the age of 60 that are Democrats in Mississippi (Limbaugh listeners?), and second of all, this goes back to what I was saying about the South - racism is alive and well and more prevalent in the older generations of white Southerners. Duh. Hopefully I'm not revealing any huge surprises for anyone out there.

And, as almost every major poll reveals, Obama is favored by more over McCain (5.2%) than Clinton (1.7%). So, I guess my question is, what's the point?

http://realclearpolitics.com/polls/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. In the latest Obama-McCain SUSA matchup (30,000 surveyed),
Obama beats McCain with more electoral votes than Hillary.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Way too early to put up electoral maps now. I seriously doubt Ohio is leaning Obama.
And Wisconsin and Iowa aren't solid anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. I eagerly await your announcement of when one may put up electoral maps.
Please do keep us all posted.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
34. So HRC losing MS is a sign of the strength of her candidacy?
I'm the first to admit that Obama probably won't carry any deep south states, but why is this somehow good for the person who got trounced by 18 points?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC