Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will superdelegates weigh in on this new race-based fearmongering by the Clinton campaign??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:34 AM
Original message
Will superdelegates weigh in on this new race-based fearmongering by the Clinton campaign??
Where are those 50 who were all set to go for Barack before Ohio ~ NOW is the time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Did they weigh in when Obama Swiftboated the Clintons on race in South Carolina?
Now would a bit late for the scolding the Obama Camp deserves for their race-baiting hateful anti-Democratic Party Karl Roveish smear-mongering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually, it was Bill's and their surrogates' remarks that crossed a line in SC...
...now they've crossed another line ~ obviously they don't mind playing to ANY kind of fear if it will get them a few votes. Fortunately, it didn't work in SC ~ and it won't work in PA. But if I were a superdelegate, I'd weigh in now for the good of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's the line the Obama Camp was selling. You bought it? Wow...
And admit it, too? Wow, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oviedodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Do you really believe that Obama is inciting this?
Get on grip, race only comes up when your people bring it up. Explain Rendell, Obama did not even talk about the comments. Now Ferraro, he has no choice because of what she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yep. (edit adds link)
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 08:19 AM by MethuenProgressive
He has his fake hypersensitivity/outrage machine running at full tilt.
Remember the leaked Obama Camp memo about their plans to Swiftboat the Clintons on Race from HuffPo that was all over DU? That's what they call "proof".

"the Obama campaign is seeking to capitalize on the view - and push the narrative - that the Clintons are using race-related issues for political leverage"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/12/obama-camps-memo-on-clin_n_81205.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Me, too. The only one benefiting from "racism" in this race is Obama.
The Racism charge benefits only Obama. Were it not for trumped-up accusations of racism against the Clintons, Obama would be down if not out of the running by now. It is racism alone (or at least the manufactured perception of it) that has got him so far ahead.

The Obama Campaign and its media allies have wrongly persuaded many people that the Clintons are stupid enough to campaign in an overtly racist way. It would take someone very, very dumb indeed to inject racism into a Democratic Primary. Because no Democrat could possibly win the primary if he or she campaigned in the "obviously" racist way so many people are going crazy over.

The only people who want to inject racism into a Democratic primary are people who want you to think the OTHER side is being racist and that THEIR side is a victim of racism. As a party, Democrats punish racists and we empower victims of racism. So if you are shrewd and sly and well-connected enough to convince voters that your opponent is a racist and your candidate is being victimized by a racist, you'll get their votes.

IOW, the Clintons would have to be FOOLS to employ racism in a campaign, and the Clintons are NOT fools.

It is reverse-racism, promulgated by Axelrod and broadcast incessantly by the MSM that has put this campaign into the shape it's in. Were both candidates the same color, and were the race being run on the basis of merit alone, the situation would be much different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I don't need a campaign to tell me anything...
...that's how you Clinton people work ~ top-down machine politics.

Buzz off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Sen. Clinton appologized for President Clintons remarks in SC
so, the Clinton camp "acknowledges" this as their fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Sounds to me as though you may be in "denial"--an early stage of grief over HRC's Orwellian
campaign turn, before you are forced to abandon your strong support for her. If Elizabeth Kubler-Ross is correct and her findings carry over to political support, the next stage might be "bargaining".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's time before this seriously damages the party...
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 08:07 AM by tokenlib
...Hillary has no intention of stopping the destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. You're right...
And if their job is to put the party first, we should be hearing from some of them soon. When I heard Bill Clinton campaigning before SC, I knew I didn't want the Clintons back in the WH ~ I'm sure some of the superdelegates are feeling that way now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yep, just like everyone else. But they won't have any right to make up facts about that conduct
. . . any more than you have here. I suspect that's the reason they haven't responded to the cries of racism coming from the Obama camp as if he needed them to come to his rescue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC