Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama only needs 360 more delegates to clinch nomination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TAWS Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:36 AM
Original message
Obama only needs 360 more delegates to clinch nomination
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 11:49 AM by TAWS
Currently RCP has him with 1614 delegates, leaving him 410 short of the 2024 needed.

However, the delegate totals from the media do not include the 78 add-on delegates that will be given to the state winner. He will pick up at least 45 add-on delegates once the state conventions start in May and June. There are still some delegates from Colorado that have not been awarded yet, so he should gain about 5 more. This means that he would need 360 more delegates.



There are 566 delegates up for grabs in the remaining contests. If we assume he wins half of these pledged delegates, he will gain 283 and would only need 77 more delegates.

He would just need 77 from the 260 (30%) currently uncommitted superdelegates to win the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wooo-hooooo!
Sorry, I tend to get a little excited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I am scared to declare it over
until Clinton steps down. She still seems willing to grab this at all costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. She will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FunkyLeprechaun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good
I hope the supers go to Obama so he can win the nomination. Come on Obama, play that 50-delegate card please? Pretty please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm "almost" sure that he has 77 committed supers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Didn't you hear about the NEW NEW nomination system?
Whoever wins in a state designated by the Clinton campaign after exhaustive predictive polling wins the nomination. That's the new rule. This year, the Clinton campaign has chosen

PENNSYLVANIA

as your Democratic nominating state.

So, all that stuff you just said is hereby null, void, and no longer operational. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Gobama!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Until you add FL and MI, then the needed total rises.
And the will be counted, one way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. We're at the point that counting them won't allow Hillary to overtake Obama anyway...
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. How does that change now that Spitzer is no longer a superdelegate?
I tried to figure it out, but it made my head hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think it reduces superdelegates by one
and takes one out of Hillary's committed column.

Because the Lt. Governor is already a superdelegate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC