Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A question Hillary supporters,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:29 PM
Original message
A question Hillary supporters,
Do you REALLY want to talk about the issues???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Name one n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Let's tackle the war first?
What is Hillary's time table? Obama's is 16 months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Hillary's plan is to start bringing troops home within 60 days of taking office.
She also wants to stabilize Iraq by getting American aid into the hands of the Iraqi people and appoint a high ranked UN official to help broker agreements between the different factions in the Iraqi government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. Then why waste each other's time? HRC has a website w/a section
for each issue

Starting Phased Redeployment within Hillary's First Days in Office: The most important part of Hillary's plan is the first: to end our military engagement in Iraq's civil war and immediately start bringing our troops home. As president, one of Hillary's first official actions would be to convene the Joint Chiefs of Staff, her Secretary of Defense, and her National Security Council. She would direct them to draw up a clear, viable plan to bring our troops home starting with the first 60 days of her Administration. She would also direct the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to prepare a comprehensive plan to provide the highest quality health care and benefits to every service member -- including every member of the National Guard and Reserves -- and their families.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/iraq/

And the satisfying part is, because she has a track record of helping veterans in our state, we can have confidence that she will do what she promised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Why would you consider this a waste of time
When they start bringing troops home, and when ALL of the troops are home are two very different things.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. You make my point for me ... we're comparing apples and oranges
Both candidates seem to understand that occupation is a bad thing to continue - but when you emphasize the word "all" that suggests you are preparing a counter argument, which I can predict three moves ahead.

So why continue this dance of words? For both of us, it's a waste of time.

Once upon a time, there was an unwritten rule that politics stopped at the continent's edge, that foreign policy would not be used for campaign advantage ... it's too easy to demagogue an issue.

How about taxes or civil rights? Government benefits and program proposals ... the boring stuff that affects us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. stop being sexist




:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sure do...We have been trying
for weeks....Are ya ready now? O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Do you really think mandates for health care coverage will fly with Repugs?
I think Obama's position is more pragmatic/do-able. Telling people
they HAVE to do something is going to get tagged as "socialist
medicine" (even if in actuality it's not).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymeme Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. NO Nationwide Health Care Plan Will Work UNLESS Everybody's In It, As Hillary Has Said Repeatedly...
NO Nationwide Health Care Plan Will Work UNLESS Everybody's In It, As Hillary Has Said Repeatedly...

Obama's half-*ssed plan of only covering so many and letting everybody else fend for themselves is absurd and bound to FLOP!

Who gives a rat's rip what the Republicans will accept or talk people out of with specious rhetoric.

They won't accept Obama's plan either unless one of their big-bucks insurance providers gets in the mix and can take away a megabucks windfall from something which will be called a "compromise."

Hillary's plan is better. It covers everyone regardless and give health care to people for most of them for less than they would pay for it on their own.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paperbag_ princess Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I think that the Republicans
will buy in to the individual responsibility aspect of it....they all realize that their money is already funding the uninsured emergency situations..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. I think we all realize that regardless which Democratic candidate is
elected, they will have to make some changes and compromises to get their respective health care plans through Congress. In reality, I see the mandates that Hillary calls for in her plan as similar to current enforced Social Security and Medicare taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Then why did this
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 04:35 PM by againes654
make the greatest page, and the fall of the DU planet? Not one Hillary supporter came to discuss?


Edited to add link--- http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5040235&mesg_id=5040235
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paperbag_ princess Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. I would have been there....sorry I missed it nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is this Wednesday Afternoon at the Improv??
A cult member and Eliot Spitzer walk into a bar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Experience is certainly an issue. Yet the Obama people scream when Hillary people bring it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. not really,
There have been many Presidents that were very experienced, and failed terribly, and there have also been many that weren't as experienced, and did great things.

Hell the experience that bush has around him is staggering considering how badly they fucked things up.

I prefer change over experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I'll talk experience any time, any place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. That was an excellent post
I am shocked at how few rec's it got. Shame what DU has become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jconner27 Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ok
If Obama is going to hit Hillary over the head with the Iran vote where was he at? Last time I check he didn't even vote. And if he's against the war why did he vote fund the war and he didn't even protest it with a fillbuster? Speaking on the issue Obama followers created the whole faux race baiting so do you think it was right for Obama flunkies running aound and called a former president racist when they knew what he meant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. From what I understand
no-one left in the Presidential race is really in any kind of hurry to get us out of Iraq. Obama has set a time table of 16 months, what is Clinton's time table?

As to the Iran vote, no vote is better than an aye vote, but he still should have voiced a no vote. It was his way to stay in the middle as so many politicians have to do to please the masses. I am not saying it is right or wrong, just that it is what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jconner27 Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. More lies from team Obama
1. Obama own people debunk him on a time to pull out
2. So according to you no stance is a good stance. Yeah Obama is wooing me here
3. You guys accuse Hillary to be centrist yet Obama plays the middle of the road game that's cool.

I rather see your guy go in defeat than help you get him elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. So when Obama wins the nomination
are you going to vote for McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't want to talk about anything anymore....
What's the point? All I see are slams against Clinton and any Democrat that supports her. It's sort of hard for me watching the Democratic Party self destruct. And don't blame it on Clinton either. I've seen that already and it's just fucking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Ok, I was trying to actually
have a logical debate on the issues, but go ahead. Just confirms my suspicions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. what issues? Name one?
Your post wasn't about issues, it was about baiting people. If you wanted to talk issues, you might have actually talked about one in your OP. ......lice the economy, health care, foreign policy, etc.....but you didn't mention one single issue now did you?

Oh and btw, if you or I posted a post on an actual issue it would more than likely sink like a stone. They do all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. You fail to understand the reasoning behind my post
Earlier today, I did write a post about the issues. It did sink like a stone. So this time I asked before I typed out 6 fucking paragraphs for them to sink to the bottom of the line.

Like I said it confirms my suspicions that Clinton people don't want to talk about the issues any more than some Obama people I see here. All people want to do here anymore is bitch and moan and throw stones. Well I am sick of it. I used to come here for news, but that is hard anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. The reason you didn't get responses probably has to do with the fact
many Clinton supporters aren't bothering with GD: P at all any more. The whole 1st page most of today was filled with threads doing nothing but bashing Hillary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. What a vague post...usually someone who posts something like this will
list specifics, like what particular issue you want to hear about? I don't think anyone here could list every issue relevant to your post...but if you could give specifics it would be greatly appreciated...

Thanks! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
28. I'm guessing they're drowning in slime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
29. I have noticed that many of the extreme Hillary crowd
do not fight battles on substance but only use discredited slander, ad hominem attacks and unsupported allegations of bigotry. A few Obama supporters do the same but most seemed to have been cleared out. Indeed, because many of the Obama camp have come from other campaigns there is a general recognition that Obama is not perfect and that he has made mistakes; suggest those ideas to some of the wilder preachers of the Clinton cause and you will receive nothing but attacks and ignores.

There are the good ones in the Clinton camp (OperationMindCrime's recent call for the Clinton campaign to condemn outright Ferraro's racism springs to mind) but many seem to have become fixated upon either the Feminist issue or Clinton pre-eminence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC