Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does it always take DAYS for HRC's campaign to change course after a f*ck up?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:51 PM
Original message
Why does it always take DAYS for HRC's campaign to change course after a f*ck up?
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 05:03 PM by Truth Hurts A Lot
Has anyone noticed how slow her response machine is? Her political instincts are not as sharp as Obama's. That's how HRC keeps finding herself in situations where she looks like a hypocrite. Remember how she didn't condemn Callejo in the interview, but then hours later her campaign corrected it? I could cite many other examples like Bob Johnson, etc. but I think we're all familiar with how she is super slow to respond, if she responds at all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Independent-Voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ready to Fuck Things Up on Day One
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Triangulation is a lengthy process
Focus groups, polls, Hillary's ego.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. LOL! So true! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. ...protractor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Someone has to work up the nerve to tell her
that they've fucked up? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. She's a blundering executive. Obama acts decisively. Hillary stumbles around blindly
for days before she figures out what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ahh for chrise sakes all you Obama people are just pissed that she got rid of Ferraro
and yet you're STILL finding ways to whine about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. SHE didn't get rid of Ferraro. That would have required integrity
Ferraro removed herself and had a very ugly exit speech to go with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Oh gimme a break. So now your claiming Hillary had nothing to do with Ferraro leaving?
That's precious!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Ferraro is making the rounds RIGHT NOW on FOX
If Clinton wanted her silent, believe me, she would be. Clinton approves of her message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Seriously? Obama is the one that is not so good at responses...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why did Obama wait days before he spoke up about the race-baiting in SC?
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 05:01 PM by wlucinda
I'm sure he had his resaons.

Hillary condemed Feraros comments right after Obamas campaign made their statement.
But that fact seems to be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It would have been political suicide. He was right to ignore the Clintons
race baiting. However, Obama's campaign couldn't stop people from noticing and talking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No. He knew it wasn't true, but he let it go so it could do damage.
Jesse Jackson III ran with it and then when people complained, Obama finally stepped up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Focus groups weren't formed and closed in a day y'know
Basically, she's not a leader. As much as she likes to mythically proclaim herself to be one, she's not, and pretty much never has been.

She needs focus groups to convene before making a decision, even if it's a cut-and-dried issue. She chooses to play it "safe" or else she won't be seen as tough or worse! seen as a lefty peacenik.

She is no leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. She's just like Bush.
She surrounds herself with sycophants instead of professionals, and lives inside a little bubble.

She doesn't really comprehend how many people she's alienating, and has little connection with the real world.

It takes days for the sycophants just to screw up the courage to bring up a subject that sounds even slightly critical of her, and she's guaranteed to throw a temper tantrum like a four-year-old when they do. So, like Bush, her campaign stays the course - straight over a cliff.

Just what we need in the Oval Office...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. PLAIN AND SIMPLE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. Ferraro wasn't done doing maximum damage. Now that race is all
anyone's talking about (and not Obama's win, EXCEPT in context of race--the black/white vote in MS), her suicide mission is accomplished. The media will chew on it from here, and the "affirmative action candidate" seeps into the public consciousness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Sadly, you're right. Nobody's talking about MS... just Ferraro
and racism. Clinton wins this battle, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. Because they want to leave it out there long enough,,,
for a lot of people to hear...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. Almost...
Ferraro isn't gone by a long shot - she's just done an "I'm not with the band" move. Now she can continue to whip up racist fervor and HRC can simply smile and say - not my problem. Expect to hear from GF until the Pennsylvania primary is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Because it's working
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. She has to wait for Penn's next polling results to come in and for him to tell her what to do. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. Simple - because she WILL NOT take ownership of those f&^% ups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC