Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Bashes Clinton (and Obama) with His Mighty Might!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:35 PM
Original message
Bush Bashes Clinton (and Obama) with His Mighty Might!
By Peter Baker (I added "with his Mighty Might" because I am a dork.)

President Bush waded further into the presidential race today, slamming Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama for "empty, hollow political rhetoric" on trade and warning that they would make "a reckless mistake" by retreating from agreements to lower barriers with other countries.

Although he did not name Clinton or Obama, he left little doubt whom he was talking about, at one point even mocking Clinton's promise to take a "timeout" from free trade agreements if she becomes president. "You know, some have called for a 'timeout' from trade," he told the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce shortly after Clinton addressed the group. "I guess that's probably popular with the focus group. You know, they toss out the word 'timeout' from trade -- it's got this kind of catchy little title to it. In the 21st century, a timeout from trade would be a timeout from growth, a timeout from jobs and a timeout from good results."

Bush, who used his speech to push Congress to pass a pending free trade agreement with Colombia, noted pointedly that Clinton's husband, Bill Clinton, was a strong supporter of opening markets when he was president and quoted from his predecessor's remarks when signing legislation to implement the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) 14 years ago. Hillary Clinton, seconded by Obama, has abandoned NAFTA, saying she would threaten to opt out of the pact if Mexico and Canada did not agree to renegotiate it. "Listen, NAFTA has worked," Bush said. "People shouldn't back away from NAFTA. It's been a positive development for a lot of people."

snip

Clinton fired back later in the day. "We don't need lectures on trade from a president who has turned back the clock on worker and environmental protections, allowed our trade deficit to skyrocket and stood idly by while countries like China unfairly manipulate their currency and dump products like steel on the U.S. market," she said in a statement. "In fact, the reason we so desperately need to take a timeout from new trade agreements is to put a stop to the Bush Administration's reckless and destructive trade policies."

-----------
Link:
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/12/bush_bashes_clinton_and_obama_1.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why didn't he attack Obama over Obama's trade time-out?
Oh yeah. Obama, the "progressive" hero, isn't calling for this long sought labor goal...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Acording to the article, Bush did not name names.
The author of the article, Peter Baker did. I don't know anything about Baker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. It is well known Hill is for a trade time-out. The "progressive" hero is not
He isn't going to name names. Even candidates on the campaign trail often make implied criticisms of candidates rather than using names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I'm not in favor of a trade timeout either. It's an idiotic idea
along with interest rate freezes and other BS which has no chance of actually coming to pass. That kind of thinking went out of fashion in the 1970s, for good reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ah, Fuck you, Bush! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. with enemies like that... who needs friends? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Wow, You look just like me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. yah it's a fun avvie :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It looks like she is screaming at our posts in terror. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would like to see him throw something out there every day for them to rebut.
I think it would give both candidates an opportunity to showcase their stance on the issues and their differences from McCain and the Republicans. We are so caught up in the BS right now that we seem to have lost our focus on the important matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Does anybody here
Really give a flying f*** what that ass says or thinks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No. We don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. She would be so awesome in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC