Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For all those who believe Obama "didn't know" How do you explain this??????:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:05 PM
Original message
For all those who believe Obama "didn't know" How do you explain this??????:
Disinvitation by Obama Is Criticized

CHICAGO, March 5 — The Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., senior pastor of the popular Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago and spiritual mentor to Senator Barack Obama, thought he knew what he would be doing on Feb. 10, the day of Senator Obama’s presidential announcement.
After all, back in January, Mr. Obama had asked Mr. Wright if he would begin the event by delivering a public invocation.

But Mr. Wright said Mr. Obama called him the night before the Feb. 10 announcement and rescinded the invitation to give the invocation.

“Fifteen minutes before Shabbos I get a call from Barack,” Mr. Wright said in an interview on Monday, recalling that he was at an interfaith conference at the time. “One of his members had talked him into uninviting me,” Mr. Wright said, referring to Mr. Obama’s campaign advisers.

Some black leaders are questioning Mr. Obama’s decision to distance his campaign from Mr. Wright because of the campaign’s apparent fear of criticism over Mr. Wright’s teachings, which some say are overly Afrocentric to the point of excluding whites.


So, if Obama cancelled Wright appearing with him when he
announced he was running for President, he must have known
how 'controversial' Wright is.

He knew according to this....


According to the pastor, Mr. Obama then told him, “You can get kind of rough in the sermons, so what we’ve decided is that it’s best for you not to be out there in public.”



Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/us/politics/06obama.h...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. yawn
moving on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Because you can't defend it.Obama "lied" tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He answered the questions about Rev. Wright. It's over.
He will be the nominee. Let's unite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
110. It has only begin sweetie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #110
123. Agreed. This is trouble....BIG trouble. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
129. It ain't so. We may wish
but not so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
144. It's over in that BO is over, stick a fork in him, he's done.

He's a rookie politician who should have distanced himself from Wright years ago, but he didn't, so his goose is cooked, he's hoist with his own petard, he's going down the drain, and numerous other cliches.

I sympathize with your loss of a candidate you really supported but that happens a lot in politics. I want Dennis Kucinich to be president but it's not happening and probably never will because the GOP choose the Dems who get media attention through their members who own the media.

Throw your support behind Clinton so we don't wind up with McCain as president. Unite behind her.

If Obama withdrew gracefully now, and stayed away from Wright, he could have a shot again in 2012 and he'll only be 54. If he doesn't, it's only going to get worse. Don't kid yourself that they don't have anything else on Obama. They wouldn't use all their ammo at once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. um, wrong
But you're gonna spin it anyway you want, so why bother?

Hillary has lost.

Deal with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
87. I must have missed that
has there been an Obama coronation? In the world of politics, the time between now and the convention is a lifetime. A lifetime for more Obama faux pas, which will blissfully sail over the collective UNCONSCIOUS of the Ombamination. However, fortunately, there are still the sane among us, like saracat and the rest of us populist loving left-wing Democrats who know a sellout when we see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #87
125. It's over.
Too bad we lost Edwards along the way.
Am I glad he did not endorse anyone. Good move John.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You're so frustrated Sara. You have been for the last 48 hours....
make yourself some tea and call it a night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. It's been a lot longer than 48 hours...
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:15 PM by Kittycat
Wasn't saracat an original JE supporter? I have nothing against them (I supported JE as close second), but I think I remember a lot of vitriol spewing and hatred even back then. If I'm wrong about whom I'm thinking of, I do stand corrected.

ETA: I agree with the cup of tea. Always relaxing, I might have one here in a minute :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I have water in pot as we speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
82. Goes well
with the Kool-Aid and muffins, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #82
88. I prefer bagels or scones.
never really like kool-aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. Oh
but you reek of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #90
135. Cleric, have you not joined the Church of Obamatology? Have you not taken Obama as your personal
savior?

Come one...just take a sip...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #88
137. So you guys are expets on Kool-Aid
who would have thought?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
38. When you can't refute someone on facts, attack them personally...
It's a well known logical fallacy: http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ad-hominem.html">The Fallacy of Ad Hominem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
54. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bilgewaterbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
48. A glass of Merlot does wonders as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Give it up.
The only people still wanting a controversy over this are you and Sean Hannity.

Do you really want to keep that company? I'd be embarrassed to align myself with that blockhead, personally.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
84. Actually
anyone with a passing interest in TRUTH and lies would want to know. Thus, that completely excludes Obamites, impervious to rationality and reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #84
89. Speaking of truth and transparency... Tax Returns? Library Donor Lists? Earmarks? Papers?
That's what I thought :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. I'm an Edwards supporter genius
so take your Obamite reflexive, "but Hillary did it" mantra somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #91
104.  But you clearly have been
supporting HRC, as seen by your anti-Obama rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #104
116. I have to chuckle at that
"You clearly must be supporting Clinton...."

The evidence for that?

"...you criticize Obama."

For us or against us.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #84
94. If you're really a cleric,
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 11:38 PM by americanstranger
I'll expect you to drop the 'obamites' and address me like a human being who happens to favor a different candidate than you.

Hell, even if you're not a cleric. Drop the ad hominems and we'll talk.

This is a courtesy I extend to all Clinton supporters. I expect no less from you.

Thanks.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #94
101. Sorry pal
but you have no power or sway over me. You are what you are and I don't believe I was answering YOU, unless you are kittycat and thus an alter ego.

Wear your legacy as a cultish kool-aid drinking lemming proudly. By the way, I'm so very happy to hear how you treat Hillbots. I'm an Edwards supporter,you know, those left wingers that represent the REAL Democratic Party, so I don't give a darn what you do with Hillary's folk, got it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #101
102. Oh. Okay.
Edited on Sat Mar-15-08 12:10 AM by americanstranger
You people crack me up.

I was an Edwards supporter, too. I even voted for him in the NY primary after he had dropped out of the race. As far as I'm concerned, he was the guy I would have preferred because he talked about the issues I cared about.

That was taken away from me, and I didn't commit to either candidate until I saw something positive from one or the other. Instead, I saw how tragi-comically inept the Clinton campaign was and I could smell the flop-sweat all the way from Arkansas. I thought her ambition was fucking embarrassing and her negatives way outweighed any positives she may ever have had.

So I moved to Obama. Not the manner of choice I wanted to make, but hey. If the lesser of two evils is what you get, that's what you go with.

So you just go right ahead and be a righteous asshole about how you supported the right guy and that somehow makes you better than us kool-aid drinking lemmings. Makes you no less of an asshole, though.

Call me something I'm not, and I'll call you exactly what you are. Fair enough?

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #102
103. Sticks and stones, AS, sticks and stones...
Thats right Obamite, I have my own mind and am impervious to the entreaties of Kool-Aid drinking masses. Someone better be left to pick up the pieces of a tattered Party after the two corporate spoilers do their dirty work.

Maybe then, we will be able to evict you right-wing interlopers who call yourself "moderate" Democrats back to the Stone Age, and restore the left-wing politics necessary to erase the stench of conservatism.

Sorry, but the history of your selection process is your cross to bear. I couldn't care less. The fact you get profane is so predictable Obamaton, so very predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #103
106. Yo, if the shoe fits, I say.
Fits you like a glove. Later.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #103
108. arrogance and condescencion are rarely attractive.
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #108
119. Kool Aid drinking lemmings
are disgusting. The combination of naivete and no self-awareness is dangerous and catastrophic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:37 PM
Original message
who do you classify as kool aid drinking lemmings?
every single person who supports Barack Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #84
126. Love is blind.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #25
120. And ABC, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC ...
And the blogs, etc. etc. ad infinitum.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
58. OMG! A politician lied!! CALL THE MEDIA!!!
SEND OUT THE ALARMS!! CALL THE FIRE DEPARTMENT!! A POLITICIAN LIED!!! I other news the Earth is round, and revolves around the sun.



I'm sure St Hillary has yet to speak the dreaded political lie :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
62. No, he didn't
You constantly speak without even looking into things.

When Obama began preparing for his Presidential run last year, he did a bunch of self-vetting.
His researchers uncovered these statements by Wright and the Obama campaign released a statement denouncing them.
This is also why he began distancing himself from Wright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #62
114. makes him look foolish --lack of judgment for waiting till media got on his tail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #114
127. Foolish, and untrustworthy
I am not saying he is deceitful that is how it will be played.
He cannot win in November with the GOP having these WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. kind of rough is different from the
clips recently highlighted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Obama "knew" there was a "problem". I is obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. But no proof he "lied" about the most incendiary stuff.
Hillary has lost.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. What nonsense.
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:14 PM by saracat
if Barack wins, the Democratic party has lost.This is really damaging in the GE.And Gingrich spun it to attack all Dems.Thanks a lot Barack. The down ticket appreciates your instance on hanging with a racist , white hating preacher. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. Yeahy, it is nonsense. Sweetie, there's bigger fish to fry. Like our economy.
This sideshow ain't nothing to get all steamed about.

You leave the thinking to us adults and you run along and play now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #31
47. "This sideshow ain't nothing to get all steamed about"
Unless it involves Hillary.....

Love the hypocracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qnr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
59. Ah. Apparently you haven't been listening to the people at the supermarket. S'ok with me
though, because I have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #59
68. Me, too, and at my supermarket they don't like Democrats,

haven't liked Hillary for years, don't trust Obama whatsoever, and don't mention McCain. I think the whole damn election is up for grabs at this point. False confidence about either of our candidate's chances seems plain foolish. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
57. Check the McCain vs. Dem polls. BHO does better than HRC in most of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
67. You are so wrong.
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:52 PM by JackORoses
When Obama wins, we all win.
Even you.

Aren't you the slightest bit ashamed that you have stooped to promoting racial division in the service of Hillary?

I think John Edwards would be disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExtraGriz Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
64. of course he knew sara...tried to hide it
just like today, he admitted that rezko had a bigger role in his political fundraising than what was admitted....$250,000 more than before, but yet no favors were exchanged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. He probably knew by then
He said he found out when he began running for president, which is entirely believable to me. Generally when candidates take the initial steps to start running, they hire a research firm to do self-research on any potential skeletons that might come out of their closets. I would guess that that is when Obama found out about these statements from Wright. Given that these few sermons are the only ones out of hundreds that have surfaced (at least so far), it is pretty believable that Obama might not have been aware of them before that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. It isn't belivable in the least.It is about as believable that he didn't "know that " Rezko didn't
have a good reputaion when all Chicago "knew". It is obvious these sermons took place down through the years and they were controversial enough that they would have been mentioned.Shoot , wright was proud enough to be "selling" them.That was how they surfaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moxie_1 Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. If you read his book, you can see that he was familiar with Wright's ideas were even then. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Don't Try To Confuse Them With A Reasonable Explaination...
Too much Hilly Luv happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #17
111. What is really amazing that BO did not "deal' with this issure before. Poor judgment on his part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
113. where this is smoke there fire. poor judgment on BO to let it hang out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
131. And he started THINKING about running when?
Right from his start as senator certainly. Most commentators seem to use that as the explanation for his caution in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't care if he did know. I don't have a problem with Wright. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:10 PM
Original message
Obama never said that, you're OP premise is false to say the least
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Its been thoroughly explained THREE TIMES tonight by Obama himself. Watch TV much or
do you just like to stir up shit and post flamebait without doing any type of research or reading?

You've come a long way from the Edwards supporter I once enjoyed reading. Pity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm glad we can only do 3 Top Post's, some folks is gettin silly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Yeah, I agree with you.
It is a pity - such hate and vitriol constantly. Unfortunately that has taken over so many lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. I watched. He didn't explain well at all. He "knew" about these ideas of Wrights and did nothing to
distance himself.It isn't true that he didn't know.Wright himself said Obama would have to distance himself from Wright if he wanted to win. Barack knew all this.
Andf I just posted "research that proves Obam "knew" there was a "problem". But you don't like the evidence. The GOP will like it just fine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LowerManhattanite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. “The GOP will like it just fine!”
A kindred spirit found.

Sad, that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
73. She's like many of the privileged white people who feel oppressed by racist black people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
98. He explained it. I don't believe him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Obama made it VERY clear that Wright had said some things he didn't agree with when he started his
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:14 PM by jmg257
campaign and Obama did "renounce" those comments HE KNEW ABOUT. He also said he is now hearing other things (that have been getting all the air time) for the 1st time. AND he specifically renounces those too.

I JUST watched this for the 3rd time on CNN - and he made it a point to be very clear about this "discrepency" when he started campaigning - and it ain't one.

Not all that hard to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I think Obama has said
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:17 PM by woolldog
that he started seeing reports about some of the things Wright about the time he launched his presidential bid. Not sure of the timing though.

People will be pouring over all his sermons now. You can guarantee that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
49. Yep - guy on CNN said "he should be given the benefit of the doubt until they check it out".
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:28 PM by jmg257
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. Wright told everyone he would be a problem months ago
Everyone knows that Wright is controversial.

It's the specific quotes that he says he didn't know about.

He is parsing? Sure.

You are also attacking his friend of 20 years.

Frankly, if I was Obama this would be my statement.

"You want me to attack my friend and spiritual mentor. Fuck you.

Thank you and God bless America."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. Now, THAT would be refreshing politics! LOL
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:23 PM by JohnnyLib2
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
46. I'm tired of this "who is purer than pure" horseshit
The man is a politician from Chicago. Of course, he has some sketchy friends.

You know what? I'm an Ivy Leaguer too. And I cam from a middle class family with sketchy friends and relatives all over the place. Drugs. Alcohol. Jail time. A few folks who are a little less than broad-minded when it comes to race. Criminal behavior. I spend Christmas Eve with all of this. And I am not running away from it for anyone. Do I engage in it myself? Do I criticize it when necessary? Yes. Do I say I don't want it around me? Yes. But these are my people.

So, blow me, America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #46
78. Obama was the one playing holier than thou. Now he's Done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #78
141. Yep, this is not over my a long shot. Firing up those 527's as we speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
50. .
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
53. "......Thank you and God bless America."
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
76. He might as well say it, because this is the Dean Scream in surround sound.
It's O-vah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #76
83. except Dean actually did scream, Obama has nothing to do with what Wright said
This smear is O-vah. Much like Hillary's Presidential hopes.
Sorry to be the one to break it to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. that is consistent with what Obama said tonight
Obama said he never heard some of the statements that are getting airplay. he never said that he didn't hear the Pastor say controversial things.

why are you acting like Sean Hannity and trying to imply something that isn't there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
27. Obama saying tonight that he never heard Rev Wright bigory in church is a stretch of credulity
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:21 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Tamron Hall on MSNBC said SHE went to that church sometimes and she never heard Wright say anything
like what she saw/heard in those videos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
79. Did she go there for 20 years and have some kids baptized there?
Yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #27
112. And do yah suppose that BO never had a discussion in 20 yrs with other churchmembers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
28. It goes like this - they are called question marks. One is usually sufficient. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Really????//////????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. You must FOCUS, the '?' is powerful - do NOT give in. Just ONE! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. OK!!!!!!11111oneoneone11!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Now you are the master, and I the student. *bows* ? Oops. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. Let me try:
you're desperate, and Hillary is still losing!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. and your ugly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. Three words . . . only two of them are used correctly. Keep trying!(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. Your mama never loved you
and she sews socks that smell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #32
75. That's pretty silly, and
desperate!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #29
70. um, do you believe it is an issue yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #70
77. No, it's a media driven frenzy to distract. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:23 PM
Original message
This is far from over. A thorough examination is at hand. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
42. It's already over. Just like the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
37. He's already said it was brought to his attention when he first began campaigning.
So what's your point??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #37
65. it's an attempted clusterfuck in progress
Obama is doing everything right in dealing with this. The second part of his interview on Anderson Cooper was great. He talked about race and religion and politics, really creating an opportunity out of this to talk about his vision for America. The guy is a deft politician as it turns out. I love watching him work.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #37
130. Poor judgement on his part -that he did not deal with this issue then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
43. Wright and Obama have planned this all along.

“If Barack gets past the primary, he might have to publicly distance himself from me,” Mr. Wright said with a shrug. “I said it to Barack personally, and he said yeah, that might have to happen.”

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5083526&mesg_id=5083526


He just waited too long. He never should have appointed him to his advisory committee knowing what Wright had said on the record. Now Obama is reduced to blowing smoke about knowing about 'a few' of the remarks early and more later, not even specifying what was tolerable enough to put him on the committee. Then he is reduced to learning from Fox (his words) about the 9/11 quote etc., and expects that to fly against the coming media feeding frenzy.

Not a good plan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #43
61. Wright needed to get part of those fat campaign donations by being on the committee.
That likely was his price for "laying low".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
45. You used to be one of the best on the boards....
...and I used to look for your posts.

Not anymore. Please...quit while you are still very admired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
51. put a sock in it, saracat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #51
72. Thoughtful, meaningful posts like this really serve to reinforce the perception of
the shallow, blind and uninformed Obama devotee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #72
96. love your laughing well manicured warmonger pic. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #51
105. O'Reilly? Is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
52. Of course he knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
55. You people are relentless
Today it was get this out in the open Obama needs to address this now, if he doesn't the GOP win.
Now he has addressed it, but it is all a lie, what do you want him to do now, because you Hillary folks seem to have all the answers.
Do you want him to put on his American Flag Pin, sing God Bless America in Mime makeup with his hand over his heart, and shuffle off to Buffalo for the big finish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
56. Ah, it sounds like a fun party. doesn't bother me.
I hope they was some dead sexies there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
60. So what does this mean, Obama supporters?
"You can get kind of rough in the sermons.."

It begs credulity that Obama knew NOTHING about some of the things Wright said. He may or may not be telling the literal truth when he said he'd heard none of the statements that are coming out right now. But clearly, he knew, that Wright could get "kind of rough." We may not have heard the worst of it.

Obama is either lying, or being disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. It means some people just won't let it go.
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:49 PM by americanstranger
Maybe because they see it as their last chance to dirty up Obama before Clinton has to close up shop.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #66
100. This is NOT about Clinton
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 11:57 PM by NastyRiffraff
Please try not to change the subject. It's about the FACT that Obama has either lied or is spinning wildly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #100
118. no, no
Edited on Sat Mar-15-08 02:06 AM by Two Americas
Don't you see NastyRiffraff?

If you say anything remotely negative about Obama, then you must be supporting Clinton. Don't try to deny it. They are on to you. They will hunt you down and work on you until you are converted.

It is amazing that so many Obama supprters are beating up and alienating Edwards supporters. They don't seem to understand that we don't have a horse in this race and could just possibly be looking out for what is best for the party. It WILL be Obama, you WILL get on board, you WILL say nothing even vaguely negative, or you will be seen as the enemy. Just imagine how that will play in the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #66
134. Of course, that leaves out all those like me
who aren't campaigning or voting for Clinton and still recognize behavior, habits, and values unacceptable in a candidate when we see them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
63. I am so glad I voted for Obama
and do not act like you have been for the past months, hatred is beaming out of you. Shame on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
69. Stay strong, Saracat.

Once again, the messenger is being shot. You are one messenger who can take it. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
71. Obama knows full well the tenor and content of Wright's message
You'd have to be naive to believe otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
74. It's pretty simple, really Saracat, this is who you are dealing with --->




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #74
140. Lmao...Friggin perfect!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
80. I can understand him not wanting controversey at the annoucement and
although some of what Wright said five years ago is truth, I still
am wondering now, why there is so much silence from Obama about this.

I think it's all gotten out of hand.... at least on DU GD-P it has.

Wright has stated some things that many experts against the Iraq war have stated. :shrug:

So what?

I hope Obama puts a lid on this now before the vileness of GD-P spills onto the streets.

Do you think Obama will come to DU and smooth the waters for all of us members here?

At any rate, good find there, saracat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
81. Saracat, I have a question for you..
Do you believe that Obama actually believes in the statements in those videos? Or are you arguing that those statements will hurt him in the GE, so he should step down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyVT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
85. You can't convince infatuated people of the obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #85
95. That statement works both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
86. there was an article in the NYT back in April of 07 that had Wright and Obama
agreeing that if his campaign took off he would have to distance himself from the church

They knew then that it would be a problem

Chris Matthews quoted from it tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
92. OH look new york times highly parisan to HRC it's gotta be true PLEASE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
93. He said tonight that he had heard some controversial comments, but not the incendiary
comments being shown today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
97. He knew. He lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steely_Dan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
99. Yep...
I posted very much the same thing in another thread.

-P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
107. He's telling his own pastor to use the back door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #107
133. and....folks said Hillary didn't denounce Ferraro enough...so she's guilty
of racism by association.... What a mess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
109. "I wasn't aware I voted no...Let the record show I intended to vote yes"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
115. As I was standing at the gas pump
gassing up the car, after going to the grocery store. I looked over to see a car with a "Support the Troops" Yellow Ribbon. I thought to myself >>> HOW EXTREMELY IMPORTANT Pastorgate was!<<<

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
117. nytimes--march 5. -interesing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
121. Obama didn't say he didn't know.
People must have shit stuck in their ears. He said he knew, but didn't want to make an issue out of it because Wright was retiring.

He said that he wasn't present, basically that he wouldn't have sat there and listened to a man denigrate America to his face. That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usrbs Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #121
128. then why is Wright on Bo's committee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #128
132. You must not be paying attention, because he isn't anymore. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
122. Is It Me, Or Is This Story Picking Up Steam?
It's been here for a while after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
124. You are as fierce defending your own choice in Democrats as you are in
smearing others' choice in Democrats, saracat.

You cherry-pick your points to favor your bias but it doesn't translate very well to mature analysis.

Despite numerous opportunities I have yet to see you offer an explanation for the Clintons' race-baiting tactics by Billy Shaheen, Geraldine Gerraro, and of course the Big Dog himself.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
136. Of course Obama lied.....
he couldn't possibly have not know what Wright was preaching.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
138. Oh fer crying out loud - Wright's comments don't bother me but of course he lied
Obama lied through his teeth. He's a self-interested politician intent who'll do anything to get to the White House. Why would one expect otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
139. He knows how controversial that is. That's good, it means that he doesn't hate america.
You can like the person but not their beliefs. Or do you not have any republican friends or friends of differing religions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
142. Wow, this is dumb even for this OP
First, Obama has said that he heard about these comments at the very start of his campaign, so the overall premise of the post is untrue.


Second, knowing someone traditionally spits out firey rhetoric and knowing SPECIFIC divisive comments are two completely different things.

The problem here is with certain very specific comments, not firey rhetoric in general.


But don't let facts get in the way... that would be something new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
143. Do you think the Clintons didn't KNOW that Jackson Stephens brought BCCI into this country when
he was handed that report after taking office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
145. "It Hurts to Lose the One You Love" so naturally

Obama supporters want this to be over, and nothing else to come out. They want him to win and can't accept that he's toast now.

Somebody should have vetted Obama. I guess that's really up to campaign staff and supporters.

His campaign chair should have looked into all this long ago -- Obama has been in the race for two years or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
146. Here's what I feel about the "scandal"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC