Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi delivers the Judas Kiss

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:59 AM
Original message
Pelosi delivers the Judas Kiss
As per the script that was delivered months late to Pelosi, her role to fuck up another situation has been played by her beautifully. As one of the master appeasers and spineless of our leaders, she delivers only what can be expected of her, our future defeat. Not that it is all on her shoulders, this little passion play has many bad actors posing as strong Democrats, and in that void we are left with Hollywood actors their remoras singing the praises of our perfectly brand new completely vetted, untouchable by any bad news candidate Mr. Obama.

Delusion of such an epic scale can only be captured in Cinemascope. Obamists are pefectly confident, and know for a FACT that Pastormania has passed by, and by looking at the post on this board, have such a selective memory, or the internet room at the insane assylum has a shitload of computers. John Kerry was a decorated Vietnam veteran, WHITE (for all us racists), a long a distingushed history of serving this country, and he was spanked. Repeat. DECORATED VIETNAM HERO. He was against the war when he came back. Blame it on his bad campaign, the baked goods at the volunteer headquaters were not Entemanns or what ever bizzare theory you want to supply, but he LOST.

On our wide screen now is the tragedy of what has become of us. Any half brain dead person that was a Democrat could run and win, but no, like our leaders that think impeachment is a messy thing, standing up to republicans is hard work, we are presented with one candidate that has baggage that is cumbersome, but is verified and cross checked and at the platform, the other, well his baggage has been lost, and pieces keep arriving daily to our collective surprise. Pelosi and Reed, a comedy duo that should take the show on the road are mortified as is Dean of this situation, so it goes on. But that does not stop Pelosi from throwing in the obligitory kiss of Judas to the candidate that really is our best chance.

The Obamists, always a captive audience for good movie based loosely on facts or reality, are happily munching on their pop-corn knowing damn well that this was to come to pass, as any other action by defeat-is-us Pelosi would fracture the party to where it would be unrecognizable. This fall the movie ends, and the guy does not get the girl, or the guy the big prize; at least not our guy. Right now there are no surprises for Obama supporters here, as the movie is still on the screen and they cheer their hero. No plot twists here, as everything is under control, and they KNOW how this movie ends. It just does, they have been to many movies and the good always win. They just missed that Kerry movie because it went straight to DVD, and they missed it in the bargain bin, or the attendant for whatever institution for the criminally delusional has not popped it in the DVD for them to see.

Remember as you leave the theater this fall fellow Obama supporters, pick up up your soda cups, and pop-corn buckets, but leave your excuses that you did not see the republican machine coming in the movie, inside as again as no one will want to hear it here. The whooping it up for your hero, no matter what, and not even considering the outcome is your problem, and yours alone.

The responses will be:

But Hillary....

But he's so paopular/dreamy...

But your an asshole...

But he's ahead....

Hillary started it...

Hillary (insert)...

MacCain is old...

We have Obama power....

Nobody will pay attention to attack ads....

The delegates...look I have statistical proof....This one is always hysterically funny, as it has the insinuation that our candidate selection makes a rat' ass difference in the GE.

Obama always wins...

Obama (insert promised thing)


See you at the movies, I will be the one talking on the cell phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary represents the past and it is time for the Democratic Party
to move forward. Something has to change in the system or we are going to bite the dust fast. Hillary and her machine are not the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I agree 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. It's slowly starting to sink in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
48. I hate to tell you, but Obama will not change things either
He is a typical politician, lying to get in office and then doing the same old corporate crap we've dealt with for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #48
89. Someone gets it!
Typical politician, and not only that, a typical Chicago politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #48
132. Suffice it to say he has shown more leadership in effecting change.
Hillary has demonstrated her support for the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Road Scholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #132
141. I'm hoping Obama and the newbies of the congress of 2009
wont have any problem cleaning house and running the corruption out of town (Washington) post haste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #48
140. Hillary is just another politician herself.
Don't expect any change from her. Expect a lot of safe, DLC programs.

School uniforms, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
90. Change is good. Hope is good. Moving forward is good. Good is Good. Bad is Bad. Vote Obama.
Who can argue with that logic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
101. You are missing the point. You can vote for Obama till the cows come home -- we will still lose GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #101
125. Thank you for your concern.
Your concern has been duly noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #101
130. I think you are very wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #101
143. Opinions differ. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
124. No shit. It's the 21st Century, already.
Time to act like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fox Mulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
129. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
144. DLC ~~ Democrats of the Last Century?
Democrats Loving Corporations?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Math, it's what's for dinner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
15.  Yeah Straight No Chaser too! lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry you didn't get the memo America loves Obama.=)
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 12:02 PM by barack the house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
49. Yes it does, and we're going all the way baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
85. You mean some of America loves Obama.
You don't purport to speak for all of us, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #85
100. The OP does however...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #100
121. The OP, or Pelosi?
Pelosi doesn't speak for me, though she carries the title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. I love how people keep on mentioning Kerry while describing the strenght of the GOP machine.
Let's get this out ONCE AND FOR ALL: The swiftboat attacks only worked on Kerry because he didn't respond right away. Obama has shown that he won't take any shit from any source, and will confront swiftboating immediately (as with Wright.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. Kerry was swiftboated with a lie,
the RWers don't even have to comment this time, all they have to do is play those videos over and over. I don't know how this will all play out if Obama makes it to the GE, but don't kid yourself, this will be big factor to many, many voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. As I said, he will simply confront it head on and destroy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
46. As I said, it's an issue
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 12:23 PM by seasonedblue
that won't be easily destroyed. Believe me, I'm not wishing for this to happen, I'm a life-long Democrat who doesn't want McCain in the WH, but other candidates have been taken down with much, much less ammunition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #46
65. And with Clinton, all the media has to do is
pull out Whitewater, Vince Foster, Bill's women, Tax records, and why even First Lady records have been held back (when I watched CSPAN's "Presidential Library" series this past Christmas, during the installment on the Clinton Library, Brian Lamb exploded at the Chief Archivist about why the Clintons were blocking release of numerous records). Then of course there would be questions regarding where Clinton suddenly got $5,000,000 to "loan" to her campaign, the deals that hubby had with Kazakhstan and the gobs of $$$ from that, and on and on.

It would be VERY ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #65
94. Of course, but this issue is worse
than anything they can throw at the Clintons. Part of Obama's broad appeal to middle America is that he's been seen as a post-racial candidate, someone who's denounced the divisiness of the 60's and 70's & someone who promised to unite the country. Well, having Rev. Wright as a spiritual advisor for 20 years tarnishes that promise. We'll see what happens, but sadly, I expect the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #94
133. On the contrary
The fact that Obama has taken the Mark Penn-Hillary Clinton kitchen sink and turned it around in full view of the public to illustrate exactly what he has been arguing all along - perfect examples of what has gone wrong with the political system in this country and how one needs to reject this sort of constant sniping and backbiting and come together to bring this country out of economic ruin.

And ironically, the Clinton campaign keeps playing right into his hands! :rofl: The more they throw, the more he grabs it up and highlights it as more examples of tired old failed strategies that need to be purged and why he should be elected POTUS. Clinton's supporters are feeding his power!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
40. So you think that McCain and the GOP
truly want to open the spiritual advisor pandora's box?

Go read up on the radical, hate filled quotes of Persley, Hagee and Robertson. They drowned out right, the cover all the bases of hate and a couple have even said that the US foreign policy caused the 9/11 attacks.

It is not a game that McCain wants to play and there are those that support Obama that will respond in kind if the GOP or any of their little PACs try to use it in the GE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #40
52. Oh that box will be opened like Christmas morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
70. OMG, are you listening to what you're saying. In effect, that
Hillary Clinton is the only nominee without a cross to burn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #70
84. Again, they BOTH are damaged goods. Hillary's we know the most about, and by the slightest
microscopic difference she sould have a better chance than with the "suprise, surprise" candidate. But Obama will be the presumptive candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #84
147. You couldn't tell that around here. Some of you think MILLIONS of Dubai dollars won't raise
an eyebrow, except the RW folks who think all of BushInc's crimes that are actually the crimes of the Clintons won't see it that way.

They will turn those Dubai millions into a HUGE Clinton problem, and BushInc will go unblamed, protected once again by the Clintons and the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #70
87. Not at all.
I am not here to jump on either candidate. I think a democratic president is essential and I don't appreciate the hate filled rhetoric of this forum. All candidates are human and make mistakes and accept the support of folks that other folks may not like. All are subject to the attacks.

My post was about the GOP, the true enemy in the election. Folks continue to loose sight of the goal, that is that we have a democratic president.

McCain has Parsley, Hagee and Robertson.

Obama has Wright.

Hillary has David Coe and has even supported the Rev. Moon.

The box is full of bad jojo, some have more bad than others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. The Swiftboat Attacks Worked on Kerry Because the Media Endlessly Repeated Them FOR FREE
A few billion dollars worth of free advertising will work wonders for any campaign.

A "forceful" response would have been to spend every penny he had in August, and it still would have been overwhelmed. And out of money for the final stretch.

If each network gave the Swift Boaters one hour of airtime a day for a month (and this is probably a low estimate) that is about 4 or 5 billion dollars worth of free airtime.

How do you fight that?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. In the name of "Fairness" they would have played his response,
just as they now play Obama's response to the Wright dilemma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #41
54. They didn't. They refused to broadcast his Firefighters Convention speech in August
where he attacked the swifts and challenged Bush to stop hiding behind the swifts and come out and debate their services during Vietnam.

The corp newsmedia barely reported that challenge giving it minimal rotation as a newsclip and no follow up discussion.

That should prove to anyone that the corpmedia was complicitly protecting Bush at the time just as Dan Rather has been telling us this past year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Did he go on shows like Hannity or Hardball to fight it out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #56
76. His spokespeople did like Cleland and Clark. The newsmedia HAD The records from the Navy, too. Never
before were the official military records spurned for the constant repeatings of a completely fabricated story.

BTW - If you DID read the research forum thread with the data AS IT OCCURED, you'd notice that when the swifts first came out in April 2004, they WERE batted down immediately and they withdrew all fire at that time.

They re-emerged in August right when the McGreevey story hit and THAT took up all the Dem time on the networks until the Aug 19 speech to Firefighters Convention which NO NEWS NETWORK would broadcast and few reported on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #56
93. BTW - here's the link to research forum thread - it's quite long and detailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #93
122. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. Baloney - Media MUTED his counters. Dan Rather has told us media did it purposely
to protect Bush for a second term because they expected favorable rulings for the corporate media machine.

The research forum has the chronology of the attacks and the counters and the proof that media distorted that debate deliberately.

Besides, the swifts did NOT change the race. Kerry won. The DNC under Terry McAuliffe let the RNC steal that election process for Bush as they sat on their hands for the four years after 2000s theft while the RNC gained near total control of the entire election process at every level where the votes are allowed, cast and counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
119. Sorry, that is not true. He DID respond, starting in May to their attacks.
He responded in August by sending all pertinent facts to the media. The newspapers did their job; cable did not. Kerry's big mistake was really Terry McAuliffe's mistake -- Kerry did not have the money to do a full ad campaign against the Swifts because his general election was five weeks longer than Bush's (on fixed public financing), because the boneheaded Clintonistas chose that date.

Watch this video, and tell me again that "Kerry didn't fight back". He freaking did; it just wasn't effective enough:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9TIqWgu2F0&eurl=http://www.kerryvision.net/2008/01/stand_up.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #119
139. Thanks for video - what makes any counter effective is the FURTHERING of the counter
by the entire team - that is something you just didn't see from the rest of the Dem party, the left media and the left blogosphere.

After this event occurred, there should have been an AVALANCHE from the left pushing his remarks out there since the corporate media was doing its best to ignore the remarks altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pelosi Rocks !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Vice President Pelosi you go girl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Edwards -- the smartest Democrat, the only true Democrat, the only electable Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. The least corruptable way is suspend the superdelegates and award the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. But don't you get it?????
He is part of that "The United White America".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. gosh what a poor sport,
Kerry didnt get spanked by the way, it was the closest reelection win for an incumbent ever and he lost simply because of OHIO, all that anger that the repukes had towards Kerry played itself out, in other words they thought it would play forever and lasted exactly until Katrina, when the US woke up and realized while Repukes were busy wearing "purple heart bandaids" nothing was getting done. SO be it Kerry Lost, I always thought because he took a month off after the Election, also he shouldnt have taken public funds. If Hillary was so great she could beat OBAMA with all his alleged defects, I was for Edwards, but when my mom who is republican and white went in the snow to caucus for OBAMA in Idaho I knew the party was on to something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. I keep saying Republicans like Obama. They see Reagan in him, not that he is. Just inspiring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:19 PM
Original message
That movie is being wriiten. Science Fiction department please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Do you honestly
believe that Hillary will somehow be immune from attacks by the RW??? Good grief.

Of course Obama will be attacked. But so will Hillary. Any Democratic candidate would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. What Pip said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. Do I say that? Where do I say that? We just know where the MAJORITY
of her baggage is. Obama's is still in a unclaimed room at some non-descript airport waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
51. Actually we don't know
everything. What has Bill been doing the past 7 years? Think that will be off limits? If Wright is such a big issue with the whole guilt by association thing, imagine the field day the RW, MSM and GOP will have just speculating about Bill. Fair? No. But it will happen. I wouldn't be surprised if there are investigators combing NYC for anyone who can even speculate about a Clinton scandal. And they will wait until she's the nominee to dump it all out there.

And we will get the re runs. Whitewater, Rose Law Firm, Jennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, missing files, Impeachment, wagging finger, Monica, Juanita. If you don't remember those hits from the 90s be prepared to become re familiarized with them 24/7.

And it's been 8 years so there is a whole new generation of voters who were too young to be plugged into all of that mess when it happened. The GOP spin machine will be damn sure to get them up to speed.

THey don't really need much new material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. There is a small amount of innoculation that was achieved with Clinton...
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 12:32 PM by Neshanic
People really do hear the RW same old shit on Clinton and go on ignore. "God Damn America" tends to get some attention at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #30
145. We don't know half of her baggage. She's as secretive as Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarienComp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't understand one thing about this post.
Not one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Don't worry, sneak into the other theater, see something you like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
37. It's scary, isn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. wheres mrs. I love cluster bombing civilians tax returns and other papers? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Darn, I forgot the "Hillary Tax Return" elf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. "...the candidate that really is our best chance"
... is not Hillary Clinton. Obama is by no means a sure thing, but I think he's much more likely to win than her. Hillary Clinton comes to us pre-loathed by half the voters in this country.

Obama may be an unknown quantity, but he doesn't inspire the automatic and unchangeable hatred in 50% of the electorate that HRC does. I'm surprised that so many people are willing to overlook this fact, which has been on flagrant public display for the last 16 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
99. Because they are so afraid of a new Clinton Admnistration!
It isn't dems that spew all of this hatred for Hillary, it's the GOP. I mean, really, the dems wouldn't shoot themselves in the foot that way, would they? Or, do they now love Nancy Pelosi where once the disdain for her was a daily mantra? Dems, themselves, are a quandry. Where once they questioned, they now accept; where once they disliked, they now love; where once Hillary was loved and exalted, she is now deprecated and dissed. Yeah, I mean we dems are true, blue.

I am thinking a new party might be a fantastic idea, because, I am not so proud of democrats today. As far as I can tell, the Clintons are the only thing the party has to be proud of since LBJ brought about medicare. But, go ahead, talk down the Clintons and destroy the best thing about the democratic party. Eating our own has become a democratic tradition. This doesn't bode well for Barack, since we now know that feelings and loyalty for Obama can turn on a dime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. You seem depressed
Go out and get some sunshine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. And forgot the straight at emotional stability attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
115. It won't help...Clinton supporters are anti-sunshine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. I take full responsibility for my vote :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. Since you can't make a mature and cogent argument without name-calling
then your dissertation is essentially discredited and a waste of space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. I was going to write that excuse... thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. You are welcome.
The emptiness of your void is quite astonishing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Not as big as the collective void coming our way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #44
75. Unfortunately for you, you are already in your void and reality passed you by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
107. Must be a successful post, they keep replying to it.
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #107
109. The Obama Matrix has been questioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. Obama always wins...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. Haven't you heard? Thankfully the real world still wants Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
29. You're completely incoherent.
'Any half-brain-dead person that was a Democrat could run and win', you say.

And if 'candidate selection' makes no difference in a general election, as you ALSO say, I don't quite understand the point of your argument. The Republicans will go after either; only one is already disliked to the point of hatred by half of the country, though, which makes their job there that much easier (hint: that one doesn't have a Y chromosome).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. One by hatred, the other by surprise o' the week. Nice choices.
But since Obama will be declared presumptive...there you go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Yes, very lacking in any cogent point
But, its hard to have a good argument for Hillary at this point so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
31. The passion of the Hillarene.
The problem is that she is a lousy candidate by every measure. If she had anything at all to offer, her protracted demise would be sad, but she doesn't and it isn't in the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Guess what. The other candidate sucks too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #35
47. That is the Problem. Can Either of them Win?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. That's where you're wrong.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 12:48 PM by dailykoff
No doubt you think Obama is just another affirmative action patsy like Clinton. Fortunately, there's a lot more to him, once you bother to look at his record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #64
73. In which bag are the records you want us to see or know about?
No matter, they will show up at the appropriate times by your friendly republicans. Remember to tip them well, we want to reach out to them, remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #73
78. The majority of voters won't care about Obama's records,
Of course a few will wolf down every morsel of shit, just like they did last time. But Clinton lost her teflon decades ago if she every had any, which I doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #78
97. I should of numbered the excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. Kerry's albatross was the same as Clinton's
Kerry would have very likely won if he had voted against the IWR. His ability to use the war as an issue against Bush was severely weakened by his IWR vote. And Clinton would have had the nomination wrapped up a long time ago if she had done the same. Her support of the war is what drove people to Obama in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
81. Baloney - any nominee would have had that election stolen because the DNC was letting
the RNC steal it for Bush - as they refused to secure the election process for the entire four years they were expected to do so after 2000s theft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. Defeat got you down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
50. Oh boy. Pelosi is DEAD to them now, also.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usrbs Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
103. Pelosi should be dead to us all for her inept leadership
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #50
118. Define "them", please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #118
127. Of course. Hillary supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #127
138. OIC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donkeykick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
53. I wouldn't worry.
Not everyone listens to Pelosi. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
57. Please take your "meds" .... the nice doctor gave 'em to you for a reason.



And then the squirrel came out of the oak tree and danced a jig as the Obamists
played a tune. Yes a tune that could mean only one thing and that thing
had meaning and it could mean much to many. But in the back ground the
dog barked as the grey skies of March gave way to shafts of sunlight which
acted as "spot lights" in God's little passion play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Pusher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
60. Awesome post that speaks the blatant truth. No wonder ObamaNation doesn't like hearing it. lol
Only in La La Land could the truth you speak of be so easily dismissed as fiction. Only in Bizarro World could your post have no recommendations, so far into.

Let me be the first one to gladly recommend it for the cold hard truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
61. She is conceding already
to McCain.

He's old. He won't last but a term. At which point the Dems can put all this "minority" bickering behind them like a bad dream. They will win the lion's share of African Americans and Women back by 2012.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #61
77. Maybe that is our leaders plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. White Guys only
in the White House!

Women and minorities need not apply.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
63. I don't understand the point of this post... as we throwing Nancy Pelosi under the bus?
:shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. She's the driver like the South Park bus driver. She's driving to get
wiggle room as the road narrows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. I still don't get it ... maybe I need to watch more tv and movies?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #63
80. under the fleet
along with the rest of us. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
66. Another one moving past the denial stage into sad acceptance.
You and MassDem need to hook up and commiserate. Or, you need to get as cynical as me and have no faith in any politician, that way you can avoid these emotional dramas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. Is there a support group? Maybe we need one. I can't say I'm a drama queen
because I was accused of being a gay basher using that phrase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #68
88. I didn't say drama queen though, did I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #88
95. No, I was going to call myself one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
71. My Response...


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #71
102. That will be your face when you and people like you see what Obama will do to us in the GE.
But other people will not be surprised, as we will have expected it all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
72. Tragicomedy!
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 12:47 PM by BushDespiser12
Best if you stick with your day job. This script won't pass the muster test.

It will not be pretty leading up to November, but McCain will not win this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. You are projecting to the sequel. This one has a nasty plot twist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #74
83. Election fraud should be our greatest fear, not Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
82. What we "have" is politics as usual from both candidates.
And, as a movie, it would be a farce not a drama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #82
86. It's a freaking horror show now. " I Was A Zombie Democrat".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
91. Your forgot
"diebold stole it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
92. great post. Shame on Pelosi and others who are trying to control this race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #92
106. They are doing damage control. It is in the Party's best interests to give Hillary the old heave ho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metalluk Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
96. You make some good points.
Pelosi needs to keep her mouth shut and let the process follow its natural course. She pretends to be concerned about the superdelegates superimposing their judgment on the will of the people (that's what they were created for), but has no compunction about trying to superimpose her own views on the primary process.

You are also right about the Democrats having an amazing capacity to dissipate an opportunity. Hillary does have baggage and Obama does lack adequate experience. There is still one outcome that could set the Democratic Party up very nicely for the foreseeable future, if they can find their way to it.

Let's say that you're the hostess for a get-together of friends. They're starting to get hungry. Luckily, you've got two batches of cookies in the oven. One batch is ready to go; the other batch is half-done. What's your best strategy:

a) serve the ready-to-go batch now and the half-done batch later on; or

b) serve the half-baked batch now and toss out the other batch after it's burnt?

A Clinton/Obama ticket would be formidable indeed. And Obama would be more than entitled to hold out for an opportunity to be a V.P. with a significant domain of responsibility, such as the lead role in identifying and addressing major problems confronting disadvantaged communities in America. He could draw on his experience as a community organizer and gain executive experience running a major initiative of the new administration. This would set him up for a future presidency and give him an opportunity to acquire a track-record of experience that would make him a highly viable candidate as well as a potentially strong President were he elected, instead of casting him to the dogs this fall, as a vulnerable neophyte.

The Democrats could make history in the next sixteen years if they're wise enough to take the opportunity that is sitting in front of their noses. The first female President followed by the first AA president, party unity, party pride, and, most importantly, a genuine possibility of two great presidencies in succession.

But, you're probably right. The factions will probably fight to a miserable conclusion instead and ensure continuing Republican dominance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #96
98. If they combined, it woul be a cakewalk. Really. The dream ticket.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 01:12 PM by Neshanic
You are utterly correct. It would unite the party like cement. The republicans would freak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #98
105. At this point, it's like trying to put Humpty-Dumpty together again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #105
111. There still is a little more time, not much, but a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #96
117. outstanding post, metalluk. :)

"Pelosi needs to keep her mouth shut and let the process follow its natural course. She pretends to be concerned about the superdelegates superimposing their judgment on the will of the people (that's what they were created for), but has no compunction about trying to superimpose her own views on the primary process.

You are also right about the Democrats having an amazing capacity to dissipate an opportunity. Hillary does have baggage and Obama does lack adequate experience. There is still one outcome that could set the Democratic Party up very nicely for the foreseeable future, if they can find their way to it.

Let's say that you're the hostess for a get-together of friends. They're starting to get hungry. Luckily, you've got two batches of cookies in the oven. One batch is ready to go; the other batch is half-done. What's your best strategy:

a) serve the ready-to-go batch now and the half-done batch later on; or

b) serve the half-baked batch now and toss out the other batch after it's burnt?

A Clinton/Obama ticket would be formidable indeed. And Obama would be more than entitled to hold out for an opportunity to be a V.P. with a significant domain of responsibility, such as the lead role in identifying and addressing major problems confronting disadvantaged communities in America. He could draw on his experience as a community organizer and gain executive experience running a major initiative of the new administration. This would set him up for a future presidency and give him an opportunity to acquire a track-record of experience that would make him a highly viable candidate as well as a potentially strong President were he elected, instead of casting him to the dogs this fall, as a vulnerable neophyte.

The Democrats could make history in the next sixteen years if they're wise enough to take the opportunity that is sitting in front of their noses. The first female President followed by the first AA president, party unity, party pride, and, most importantly, a genuine possibility of two great presidencies in succession.

But, you're probably right. The factions will probably fight to a miserable conclusion instead and ensure continuing Republican dominance."



very well stated, i'm saving this post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
104. Neshanic in a panic?
ahahahahaahahaha!

President Obama forgives your ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #104
110. To be absolved by Obama is a great honor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #104
116. Do you ever think anything through? You are so predictable.
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #116
142. I hav thought everything through and the inevitable conclusion is President Obama
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 05:53 PM by JackORoses
try thinking this through.

Obama leads in Delegates,
States,
Votes,
Donors,
Fundraising,
Grassroots Organization,
and he does better against McCain in most polling.
These are the things that the Superdelegates are paying attention to.

What does Hillary lead in, pray tell?
Lobbyists?
Negatives?
Her big state argument is fatally flawed just as Pelosi said.

Obama will be the nominee, and he will defeat McCain.
The sooner you accept that, the sooner you can join us in getting this Nation back on track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
108. You'd prefer she answer ignorantly? Hillary has done this to herself, no Judas required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #108
112. See excuse list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #112
114. wtf are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
113. Hillary Supporters are Such Cowards
Terrified of voters and Republicans. Poor traumatized little Democrats. Oh, ouch, "they're" going to hurt us again.

It's possible to win, you know? But not with your terrified attitude.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerfectSage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
120. Yeah!!!!!!!!! March 16th will forever be known as Saint Pelosi's day.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 01:57 PM by PerfectSage
The day when Saint Pelosi drove the Clinton snakes out of the democratic party. :toast:

Five Ways Toward Accepting the Death of a Loved One

http://ezinearticles.com/?Five-Ways-Toward-Accepting-the-Death-of-a-Loved-One&id=499085
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
123. I really don't know what planet people are living on where they think Hillary's a stronger candidate
for the GE than Obama.

She's a fucking disaster, her train wreck of a primary campaign has proven that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
126. Hillbots have been making less coherent posts lately
Has the campaign stopped issuing talking points and started paying per word?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #126
134. I think you are right. They are being paid by the word.
And since they are boycotting DailyKos, they come here to get over their writers' withdrawal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
128. Pelosi simply stated what the rules are regarding
pledged delegates. She said the primary involves pledged delegates as the general involves electoral votes. In both instances the winner of the pledged delegates or electoral votes WINS the elections. The Hillary supporters are simply pissed because she does not think they should bend the rules because Hillary came up with this argument revolving big states (or even popular vote). In the beginning they did not say the person that wins the most big states (or popular vote) wins the nomination. They said the person with the most pledged delegates would win. Of course there is the problem of neither candidate being able to reach the magic number. However, if the super delegates must step in then it is only right for them to top off the person that is closest to that magic number. It would be insane to pull the person from behind and top them off to make them the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
131. I was going to write a coherent post on DU
but then I got high. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #131
135. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
136. The 3 fundmantal weaknesses inthese arguments
1. The assumption the Hillary Clinton is somehow immune from Republican attacks in the GE. Because they already hate her, the myth goes, he popularity levels cannot possibly get worse.

2. The assumption that everyone voting for Obama is a political virgin, and probably a no-good college student. Every cliche that the GOP likes to repeat about democrats - too naive, too lazy, too idealistic, too nicey-nice - is now being hurled at Obama's supporters by fellow Democrats (if you believe that).

3. The assumption that Clinton is Democrats best hope to win the GE...an argument that has not convinced a majority of people (however you slice it) even in the primaries. We are endlessly told that Clinton is the appropriate candidate, but rarely given any reasons why. see #1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
137. one candidate that has baggage that is cumbersome, but is verified and cross checked
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
146. Clinton is Fully Vetted? Tell Me Who is Denise Rich?
First of all, as much as I love the policies of John Kerry, Obama is a much better candidate and has the power to break the gridlock on major reforms by bringing about a popular mandate through effective framing.

Secondly, Clinton is hardly vetted. There are major issues - many linked to the Clintons' quid pro quo with fundraisers - to turn off independents and many Democrats, and plenty of the good ole' days to whip up voter turnout from conservatives.

And this election will be determined by turnout. Which is why Obama is best positioned for the general election since Dems will turnout in droves and he can pick up enough independents and disaffected conservatives to turn a few states blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC