Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just 8% Have Favorable Opinion of Pastor Jeremiah Wright

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:53 AM
Original message
Just 8% Have Favorable Opinion of Pastor Jeremiah Wright
national political dialogue in recent days, is viewed favorably by 8% of voters nationwide. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 58% have an unfavorable view of the Pastor whose controversial comments have created new challenges for Barack Obama’s Presidential campaign.

Wright was Obama’s Pastor until he retired last month, but Obama has repudiated the preacher’s comments.

Seventy-three percent (73%) of voters say that Wright’s comments are racially divisive. That opinion is held by 77% of White voters and 58% of African-American voters. In addressing the issue, Obama warned against injecting race into the campaign .

Most voters, 56%, said Wright’s comments made them less likely to vote for Obama. That figure includes 44% of Democrats. Just 11% of voters say they are more likely to vote for Obama because of Wright’s comments.

http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/people2/just_8_have_favorable_opinion_of_pastor_jeremiah_wright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's Vice President material
with numbers like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
87. heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Where one go to vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. and those 8% are on DU. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Touche!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. You bet. We used to be called liberals. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. You forgot Kos?
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I know nothing about KOS
Never liked it, so I can't comment on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. Well, Clinton supporters are having a strike there because Clinton has been
attacked so viciously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. I can understand that
They've been attacked here as well.
It is shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #35
57. Yeah
that street has only run one way. Clinton supporters have been so fair and have NEVER attacked Obama or his supporters at all. :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #57
61. Attacking Clinton or Obama
is different than attacking his supporters on this website. obamites are the WORST offenders of personal attacks and insults.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #61
68. That is your opinion
I have seen some vicious attacks on Obama SUPPORTERS by Hillary supporters. DU is almost hard to stomach any more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. KOS is still licking it's 2004 Dean wounds ...what would they know about events transpiring in 2008?
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 09:27 AM by Iceburg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #23
38. I think you are right--I have not visited lately--but many have Chip on their shoulders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #23
39. Don't forget...
kos is also an unpaid adviser to Sen Ned Lamont.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
71. Like it or not, Kos is far and away the most influential blog on the internet
Why do you think so many prominent politicians post there? Everyone from Kennedy and Kerry to Waxman and Pelosi. Not to mention the majority of dems running for office- including Foster who was just elected in Illinois' 14th. And it's absurd to say kos is licking any wounds. He's now a power in dem politics- far more than he was 4 years ago. Only an idiot would claim kos is irrelevant. If it were true, all the dems running for prez wouldn't have shown up at the kos convention last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
84. I'm with you. KOS must be still hurting after the way Dean has mishandled this race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
78. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Oh, poor widdle obamatron.
:crazy: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
55. Thanks, mods!
Man, I can't wait til we have a nominee and the HillHaters all leave!
If it's Obama they'll leave to support McCain as planned, if its Hillary they'll get tos'd!
Yay for DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. That's really an adult comment.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Slagathor Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Do actually support the Mets?
I'm an Obama supporter myself and I just don't see the Mets as being a team representative of our candidate. I'm a Yankees fan and I'm pretty sure that the Yanks are much more in the style of Obama. I think you ought to switch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. LA LA LA LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. OMG facts are painful!
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 09:29 AM by MATTMAN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
44. What's painful is watching a group of dipshits promoting a poll about a guy
who last month 99.9% of people had no idea about. And now we have a national poll about his favorability numbers.

But I do understand. With the democratic nomination having been decided a month ago, The Hillaroid Clone Army must find something, ANYTHING to keep their delusions alive.

Best of luck. Maybe Rezko...oh never mind, that's over too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #44
73. The truth will out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
34. The cure for SOUR GRAPES IS lots of sunshine. --
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Mar-17-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. I really wish you all would take your polls and shove them into your butts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. What is he running for again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Adviser to the Lord -God-Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. I cannot wait for DU to declare primary season 'over'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Yes then we can all rally behind the nominee.
Hopefully neither of these two losers. Gore '08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #32
75. You do realize that you are delusional, right?
it is going to be Obama, unless for some unlikely reason he doesn't show up in Denver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #75
77. If it is, Hello President McCain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. It is encouraging to see that most people condemn that militant crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
45. Amen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. oh, Wright is running for president now?
when did that happen?

and I'm sure rasmussen was easily able to word the questions so that a vast majority would respond in whatever way was most favorable for pukes and puke-lites (i.e., anti-obama, pro billary).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libbygurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
56. Sez who? Got a difft news source there?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ok "Wright is right" crowd
let the spinning begin.

Most voters, 56%, said Wright’s comments made them less likely to vote for Obama

but, but, but.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
19.  Wright's racist crap doesn't play too well with most Americans.
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 09:25 AM by barb162
Who would have thought that / Too bad for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. He's the new hero around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #25
42. 73% think his comments are racially divisive
"Seventy-three percent (73%) of voters say that Wright’s comments are racially divisive."

That should be 100% but maybe some weren't paying attention to the news the last few days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #42
60. History is racially divisive. Live with it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
40. Racist crap doesn't play too well which is why Obama is winning
this contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. Not according to this poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. That poll has no delegates. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
33. What, are we sheep? I'm supposed to dance away from social justice
because of a poll?

Wright is right. Not politic, but right. Obama can handle it fine just as he's handled every other time the Clinton campaign has injected race into this contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #33
51.  Wright is Wrong. Dance away from Wright's racist comments
such as whites gave AIDS to black people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. And, he didn't say that. Nice try, though.
His remark was about the government -- which has given disease to black Americans.

See, this is exactly what the Clinton campaign does. Thanks for the illustration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #53
72. You mean the white run US government?
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 10:26 AM by barb162
That was reputed scientifically a few decades ago. LAst the scientists looked, AIDS started in Africa, not from the US government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #72
76. Fall all over yourself spreading this hatred.
It's worked so well for Hillary so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
15. Based on a few sound bites from the MSM.
Highly selective ones, too. Wonder who picked 'em?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. It's a few too many. One would have been more than enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
37. We do tend to fall for that crap.
One is enough for those who had already made up their minds, of course, but the Wright campaign's visceral appeal is aimed at those without strong opinions or intellects. It doesn't seem to have been very effective, but it was only designed to make us a little stupider, to peel away a few votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #37
59.  One is too many. That poll indicates Obama is slipping big and fast.
That unity message doesn't work when people understand he actually had that racist fool on his campaign committee. And he only took that racist fool off his campaign when the heat got turned up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
43. I see that you don't really care...
about who the man is, the life he's led, or the sermons he has given through-out his lifetime. You just want one clip, that's all just one, to use as a weapon. You seem so pleased to eviscerate a human being's life, on the chance, you yourself will benefit from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #43
65. I guess that you don't care about this man's virulent racist comments
If this is what the man is about, why are you defending him? Do you think those clips are just the tip of the iceberg? BTW, who do you think made those tapes? Was he so embarrassed being taped that he stopped ranting the racism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #65
70. Hillary, is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #65
82. I don't judge a persons...
worth by a few excerpts. I do not disagree with the fact of blowback, or some of the horrific things done by my government in my name, but I do disagree with the language Reverend Wright used to make his point. Other than that I do not know enough to judge the man, nor his life's work. I do have a problem with pedophile priests, but I don't blame those people who accepted spiritual guidance from someone who committed crimes against little boys either. Weird. I guess I'm just not as quick to condemn human beings, regardless of their color, as you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #65
83. I think those are out-of-context clips that you're using exactly the way They want you to...
...for reasons that I suspect don't have anything to do with concern over racism. I agree with most of what's in those clips, and I haven't heard the entire sermons.

I can't wait to be called a racist for supporting Obama, though. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. Wow, how relevant....I can see where this is squarely on point...
...to just about EVERY issue in the primary and GE. Like war, poverty, health insuramce.

The only thing I can see that has a nexus to this, frankly, is that Wright's negatives are almost as bad as Queen Hillary's!

:rofl:

You earn a STUPID THREAD AWARD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. and 92% don't know who the fuck he is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
26. I wish rasmussen would actually put the numbers up for polls.........
one thing the it doesn't tell you is how many people were actually polled.

Here's what I'm getting at.

If you poll 100 people, and only 10 have heard of Wright, and 7 had an unfavorable opinion, then your number of unfavorables is 70% of people responding, but that would mean that 90% of overall people polled never heard of Wright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ka hrnt Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #26
79. They did.
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 11:10 AM by Ka hrnt
"Survey of 1,200 Likely Voters
March 14-16, 2008 "

To the right, above the blue and white boxes. And for the record, "Sixty-six percent (66%) of voters say they have read, seen, or heard news stories about Wright’s comments."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. I see the 1200 voters, but where do you see 66%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ka hrnt Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #80
89. The penultimate paragraph, to sound high-falutin.
Second to last paragraph. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
30. "56%, said Wright’s comments made them less likely to vote for Obama."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
31. REC--to the GREATEST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
36. Obama based keynote speech and "Audacity of Hope" on Wright's sermon "Audacity to Hope"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #36
50. But the perfect title would have been The Audacity of Hype
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. lol ....The Audacity of Hype
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
41. Is Jeremiah Wright running for something?
I cannot imagine wny Rasmussen is actually taking polls on the "favotability" of Wright! What a waste of time just to make a story.

Both candidates should be reminding the press and pollsters- and, dare I say, the VOTERS- that we still have separation of state and church in this country, and pastor Wright will not be in the White House and having a say in matters of state.

At least, we should hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #41
47. They took polls on Ferraro too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #47
58. where? can you link me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. Sure, link inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. that's still depressing that 37% thought Ferraro was right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #41
66. Yes he was running for Obama's Director of The Faith-Based and Community Initiatives.....
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 10:09 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
and yes it is a real department of the Oval Office created by Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #41
74. You know,
I've been begging Obama's campaign to seperate Church and state for many months now. He's the one who brought religious based gay baiting to our Party last fall. He's the one who said religious bigots are 'good decent and moral people' and he has often promised that he will continue to listen to them, and have a seat for them at the table when discussing the rights of those they see as 'cursed' and 'demonized'. That does not sound like seperation to me, it sounds like McClurkin and Caldwell will be invited to the White House and given face time to bash gays.
Obama has been asked thousands of times to simply say he will not be using gay bashers ever again as a candidate nor as President, and he refuses. He will not even promise that there will be no bashing of any American minority at his Inaugural celebration, not even that.
So this is not the first Preacher to upset people in the Obama campaign, the first one was defended to the end. No aplogy. No promise of no more attacks. In fact, he praised the bigots, and pointed out that he agrees with them and with Dick Cheney on Gay equality. Great.
Obama has mixed religion into his campaign like no Democrat I have ever seen. And the religion he brings seems to always divide. Obama has in fact refused to promise that McClurkin and Caldwell won't be in the White House. To ask that people assume he will practice the opposite of what he says and what he does is a bit much. 'Faith and Family' tour, with full baiting and regalia.
He should have kept religion out of the campaign. He should never have defened the bigots. I'm sorry to break it to you, but Obama did this whole thing himself. He invited the bashers, he promoted Wright in his books and such. He uses whomever whenever. Like the Iraq War, he says he disagrees, but he'll pay for it anyway.
Let him promise no more Evangelbashers. Let him clearly state that no minority shall ever again be spoken against at any of his events or in his White House. He held Donnie close when he was asked to denounce him. That is the fact. Said Donnie 'only wants to cure the unhappy ones'. That is not seperation at all- that is other people's dogma being foisted off as political thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
48. What was Marc Rich's approval rating after the pardon?
(In other words, who gives a shit?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #48
67.  A lot of people care. Including Obama, who was running around Friday
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 10:12 AM by barb162
to every TV station trying to put this fire out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
63. Who gives a flying fuck! Hillary's favorable opinion is not much higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #63
69. "Most voters, 56%, said Wright’s comments made them less likely to vote for Obama."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
81. Good, he shouldn't run for president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
85. Most of which based their judgments on a MSM soundbite
The same people that thought Iraq had WMD and Saddam was pals with bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. Too bad they vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
88. Well, since neither candidate is a pastor,
Well, since neither candidate is a pastor, and this Pastor Wright doesn't make policy, it seems almost... irrelevant to this particular voter.

But, if the people want circuses more than bread, it appears this campaign cycle is delivering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC