'Challenger' and 'Bargainer'
Starting in 1972 with 87 church members, Jeremiah Wright built up a congregation of 8,000 and became one of the most highly-regarded inspiring sermonizers of his generation. Many seminary students bought recordings of his sermons to learn how to preach. What is in the hundreds of thousands of minutes of his 36 years of sermons Sean Hannity did not cherry-pick to make him sound unhinged?
A Chicago Tribune profile (at
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/custom/religion/chi-070121-relig_wright,1,294740,print.story ) points out that Wright pragmatically combined traditional Baptist preacher-talk with sharp challenges to "white" society and a message of self-reliance for African-Americans. Barack Obama recently criticized his former pastor's style as something that was appropriate for the 1960s but may not always be appropriate for the 21st century.
You see, there are TWO kinds of Black leaders.
Compare Obama with, say, Al Sharpton. Obama himself, in his book 'Audacity of Hope', says that a secret of his success is his learning early that "white people tend to just LOVE a Black man who does not seem angry".
Right-wing psychologist Shelby Steele turned this Obama insight into an entire book (see
http://www.amazon.com/Bound-Excited-about-Obama-Press/dp/1416559175 ) that contrasts what he calls "challengers" (for example, Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, or Wright) with "bargainers" (for example, Obama).
Since the 1960s, most whites have come to fear abjectly being portrayed as "a racist". Challengers are "militants" who let whites know they assume racism is in play unless shown otherwise. He points out that when whites get in racial trouble (like the MSNBC morning show host whom Scarborough replaced), they often go to Sharpton because Sharpton can provide racial absolution or racial penance as well as damnation as an irretrievable racist.
In contrast, in exchange for advancement, "Bargainers" let whites know they won't cry "racism" unless they see clearly irrefutable evidence of individual prejudice or individual acts of discrimination. They are the kinds of African-Americans who make whites feel more comfortable. I agree with Steele that Obama and Oprah belong to the rare group of brilliant African-American racial tightrope-walkers who demonstrate to whites they are "bargainers" while simultaneously convincing Blacks they are not "sell-outs".
IMO, Obama's political opponents DESPERATELY want to portray him not as the "bargainer" he is but as the "challenger" he is not. They want a "scary, angry Black Man" to run against, not the cool and calm national unifier that has earned Obama the majority of Democratic primary votes, delegates, and States he has amassed. If they can't get Obama himself to lose his cool and snarl on camera, they'll settle for "linking" him to someone else who rubs millions of whites the wrong way.
IMO, this is a thread that has run through HRC's entire campaign so far, from the time Bill Clinton pointed out (just before the SC primary) that Jesse Jackson had won that state twenty years ago, to the "apology" HRC made over Ferraro's carefully-crafted comments last week. Hillary made a point of mentioning Jesse Jackson and Barack Obama in the same "money" sound byte that was sure to make it onto every on-air media report.
So, on this view, much of the racial strategy being used by Obama's political opponents is designed to have him seen as a "challenger" rather than a "bargainer". This insight has been valuable for me in understanding the political furor that developed last week.
What do YOU think?