Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's campaign says he didn't understand what "decriminalization" meant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:51 PM
Original message
Obama's campaign says he didn't understand what "decriminalization" meant
First Obama was for decriminalization of marijuana, then he was against it

Then he said he raised his hand by mistake.


http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/3/17/225516/066
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shrdlu Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe he was stoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Obama: I Inhaled, "That Was The Point"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Thanks for the laugh!
Can you imagine how fucking boring Barack Obama is stoned and without his teleprompter?

Could be pretty revealing though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Flip flop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll take Obama over Clinton when it comes to the so-called "Drug War"
The Clintons love them some drug war. More people were imprisoned for simple drug possession under Bill Clinton than at any other time. Hillary will be a continuation of that policy. She wouldn't dare risk looking "soft on crime". With Obama there's at least a chance for some changes to this travesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. no.. you have to remember Obama has to appeal to Republicans
Pubbies do not favor the decriminalization of drugs..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Well, the Ron Paul ones do (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. Ron Paul is NOT a real Republican, he's a Libertarian, he just calls himself a Republican...
...because when Libertarian calls themselves Libertarians, they almost never get elected. Republicans are stupid like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
41. Obama is aiming for a 65%+ majority on issues
He can easily leave the hardcore drug war people out on something like that.

Obviously he wouldn't talk about it on the campaign trail, but after he is in office something might well get done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #41
58. Really.. So who is his base?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. Well, you can get an easy 65% by getting the people who aren't ardent Bush fans on board
I didn't say it would be easy, but it is a noble goal, and better than Hillary's 51% majority -- one can certainly do better than that.

Anyhoo, democratic voters and independents together make up a huge majority (and adding in some disaffected Republicans doesn't hurt).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #60
64. Tell me whats left...
...Obama alienated the GLBT community.

...Obama alienated the Baby Boomers.

...Obama alienated crossover Repubs and Indys with the "GD Hate America" meme.

...Obama alienates people who despise racism.

...Obama alienates college students, flip-flops on decriminalizing MJ.

...Obama alienated people waiting for Universal Health Care.

...Obama has no economic plan in place. No Help for homeowners going to foreclosure.

...Obama alienated women for their Right to choose unless they seek Religious intervention.

...Obama has forever alienated Hillary supporters because he's proven himself a fraud.

Theres more, these are just a few off the top of my head..

What demographic is left that Obama hasn't alienated.

G-nite :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. Except he hasn't done any of those things -- and I thought we might have a nice reasoned talk
One where we could discuss pros and cons of his strategy vs. Hillary's.

*sigh*

If you respond to me in the future, please let me know if you want a serious conversation, or are just going to try to make cheap and untrue attacks. And yes, it is patently untrue, and you can tell that from the polls. Sure, Hillary is stronger among some demographics, but you grossly misstate the situation, but that doesn't mean they hate Obama. In fact, in the primary Obama has consistently had a higher approval rating than Hillary (fewer negatives even among Democrats). But heck, why bother having a reasonable conversation with someone you disagree with when you can just mindlessly attack their candidate? That's a better way to live, after all, isn't it? Who needs to have debate, rational discussion, or a careful analysis of what is going on? You don't, quite clearly, and it leaves me disappointed.

I'll not waste my time in the future trying to have a serious conversation with you unless you indicate your intention is different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #67
84. The Truth in post #64 is a bitter pill. Just because you refuse to accept it as such
doesn't make it any less True.

Please put me on ignore and it will solve any future issues. It works like a charm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, now that we have addressed the most serious issue of our time. Maybe we can talk about THE WAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You mean this?
I've lost count of Obama's:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Like McCain's going to try and campaign on Marijuana.
Clinton will get the "flip-flop" label for voting for the war if she is against McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
59. McCain will campaign on Obama's Flip Flops... They have a list!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. As I have said before, they won't highlight his stance on Marijuana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. I question your priorities, Hillary says IWR was a vote for diplomacy and you care about this?
If you want a flip flop we can talk about driver's licenses for illegal immigrants. (that was funny as hell)

or the "Words are cheap" rhetoric of a few weeks ago to the "Words Matter" statement today

Then there is the "this election they are having in Michigan won't count for anything" to "the results of this election were fair and the delegates need to be seated"


Priorities, if you honestly care about the pot issue then good for you. I don't (well not much)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. "IWR was a vote for diplomacy" yes, it was. I am glad you finally agree. good job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #33
56. Yes, everybody knew Bush was pushing diplomacy first.
Can you keep a straight face when you post such obvious lies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. Umm, you mean the WAR (on people who use) DRUGS??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libbygurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
72. The devil is in the details. If he can't understand something on a smaller level like this,...
...how's he going to comprehend something really major, like war, preemptive invasion, etc and their consequences?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #72
83. Yeah, that is a really poor excuse.
Edited on Tue Mar-18-08 11:44 AM by jlake
If he doesn't know what "decriminalization" means -- and I'll take him at his word, ;-) he is unqualified to be president.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wish the headline was:
Obama doesn't know the meaning of the word "decriminalization"?

Must be selective amnesia, now that students aren't needed anymore to caucus for him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. He didn't understand what
decriminalization meant? And he wants to be president? Is he kin to bush? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: how can an ex pot smoker not know what decriminalization means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. and he's a lawyer!
I find this unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I think there may have been some confusion about
the exact differences between legitimizing it and criminalizing it - as far as legal aspects are concerned.

People are not perfect.

I have misunderstood some pretty straightforward stuff
I have seen others do it too.

In fact, I have had arguments about the true meaning of words with people who should know better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
52. yes. There is legalization and there is decriminalization.
But I am not a lawyer and yet I know the meaning of each term. He was the freaking editor of the Harvard Law Review, and he's someone who ostensibly could have been arrested for possession. And he wants us to believe he didn't understand the term??

That's pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
70. Face it. He's a fraud to the core
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. Er...he was confused by the word decriminalization?
He was a state senator, and it never came up? Was he in a fog the entire time? (Or stoned)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. When something has several meanings....
Complaining that somebody has different opinions depending on the *context* of the usage says a tad more about the complainant, rather than the complainee.

"Decriminalization" can mean:
Unfettered use, no laws whatsoever.
Reducing penalties under certain specific circumstances.
Reducing penalties under general circumstances.

...and a whole lot of other things.

The chronic pot-heads want unfettered use, the casual users want exceptions for an occasional toke, the anti-drug-war folks want across the board reductions.

Sure, I suppose some people hate any kind of opinion that isn't "one way or the other", but Obama's in favor of sentence reductions and exceptions, but not complete legalization without some consequences for use, mis-use, or abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Holy crap.
FWIW, the above post was "Post #420" for me.

You can't make this kind of stuff up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. HA HA HA --stop babysitting for BO. He is responsible,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #28
66. It's bottom up politics, a game called Explain the Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Editor of the Harvard Law Review??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Bit mind-boggling, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. It positively defies belief! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. The hits keep coming.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
62. Letterman needs to do Obama's 10 Greatest Flip-Flop Hits..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #62
82. that would be Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. Just to be clear, this is from the Washington Times! A RW controlled paper, NOT The Clinton Camp!
"...As a candidate for the U.S. Senate four years ago, Mr. Obama told Illinois college students that he supported eliminating criminal penalties for marijuana use or possession, according to a videotape of a little noticed debate that was obtained by The Washington Times.

"I think we need to rethink and decriminalize our marijuana laws," Mr. Obama told an audience during a debate at Northwestern University in 2004. "But I'm not somebody who believes in legalization of marijuana...."

<http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/3/17/225516/066>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
57. looks like he understood both terms clearly.
He used "decriminalize" and "legalize" both properly. Looks to me as if he had a clear understanding of what he was saying. He's for decriminalization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:21 PM
Original message
Obama: Confused on Day One
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. good one---Send it to hillary--no don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
65. Bwahahahahaha!
Good one, mtnsnake. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libbygurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
71. LOL! On NAFTA, on J Wright hate speech, on legalisation /decriminalisat'n....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
76. LOL.......
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. He says right in the piece they're presenting that he didn't want it legalized
I think he meant that marijuana should be a lesser crime, like a misdemeanor. If he says in the same sentence that he's for decriminalizing but not for legalizing, then he could only mean lessening the penalties for possession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. That time of the month, dude?
I hate it when I get my period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
77. more W.O.R.M. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #77
85. And that would stand for?
If you please? Much obliged
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. What Obama Really Meant............n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. Cheers.
nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. PANDER MAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. Words matter. He just doesn't know what they mean
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. YUP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. A big REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. I thought he was a brilliant Constitutional scholar?
And he has no idea what "decriminalization" means?
Cripes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #29
63. Not even close- "Guest Lecturer"...when he's isn't campaigning for something!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
32. ...
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 11:32 PM by 2rth2pwr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Here you go
SMASH MOUTH LYRICS

"Stoned"

Leave me alone I'm over it
And everybody's movin' on
I can't see my tomorrow and yesterday has come and gone
So leave me alone
My mind is blown but it's my own
So deal with it
I'm feeling fine most the time
I may be on the outside but no ones getting in
So leave me alone
We're O.K. reelin' in the days
We're alright we're just getting high
Let us be it'll be all right
I got no strife I'm loving life
Could you say the same
You don't have to move to groove
So come on up and see me but leave that judge behind
'Cause I'm loving life


I'm gettin' stoned and what's wrong with that
The president seems to be just fine
Come on up and see me
Come on up just know that I'm gettin' stoned
I'm gettin' stoned I'm gettin' stoned I'm gettin' stoned

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
36. A constitutional scholar who doesn't understand what "decriminalization" is?
Okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. Yup just the latest in a series of lies Obama has been caught in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. What exactly does the constitution have to do with "decriminalization"
So now Obama is a bad candidate because he doesn't know everything about every law in America. What a prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. I checked.
"decriminalization" is not in the text.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
39. We don't need to worry about the Republicans defeating us ..
It's being done by others who call themselves Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. ha ha---you blame us??---BO did this all by HIMSELF. Blame HIM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Sure, silly. The Clintons made him do it, obviously!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #45
51. yes. it was so so so obvious that
it flew over my head!!

.......

sarc. on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
44. I was not aware I voted "no" - I mean "yes" - let the record show I meant...what was
the correct vote again? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #44
50. Present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #44
78. Exactly...
"What is the politically advantageous vote again?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metalluk Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
46. That's a tough one!
"Decriminalization." That's a tricky concept. You'd pretty much have to have a law degree from Harvard Law School or somewhere to get that.

What's next? I didn't know what that big red button was for. I pushed it by mistake.

It's all about EXPERIENCE, friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
47. Ooh he's a flip flopper, ar you going to break out the flip flops
and the purple heart bandages?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #47
53. GOT FLIP FLOPS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
48. So he flip-flops on marijuana
He also flip-flopped on DOMA just before entering the presidential race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
55. Editor of Harvard Law Review? Tell me another one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
68. The President of Canada was also confused by the terminology.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
69. I don't want a President who is confused by the word decriminalization. Mass chaos would ensue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
73. A harvard graduate does not know what the term decriminalization means?
This has to be the most outrageous lie Obama's campaign has told to date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
74. Bwahaha!
I am a stoner with
no legal degree and
I know what decriminalization
means.

How did he pass the Bar
exam not knowing that.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
75. The Editor of the Harvard Law Review doesnt know what Decriminalization means???
Yeah, and he never heard his preacher say some crazy shit....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
79. I'll take him having the balls to at least discuss over the School Marm
It's unfortunate that we have stupid pot rules. I fully expect Obama to address it once he becomes President.

The last thing you'd hear from School Marm Hillary is any discussion about marijuana reform.

Thanks for your Rush impression though...impeccable!

:puke:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WDIM Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
80. And Hillary is better how?
I'm pro-legalization but that won't happen in this generation of politicians.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #80
81. Stay focused on the OP -It is about BO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC