Freeper Jim Davis says his notes on Obama attendance are in Landfill

[RamboLiberal]

:rofl: Sorry to link Free Republic - but this is too funny! And now he's trying to accuse Obama people of altering evidence.

My article was published in the first week of August. Everyone's memory was still fresh. I still had all of my notes. There hadn't been a lot of time to doctor or edit any videos or websites. But the Obama camp chose to remain silent at that time. I have repeatedly called the campaign and the church, asking for an interview and mentioning the July 22 date in the messages I've left.

If Obama wasn't there, they should have spoken up right away -- immediately after the article was published. I'd bring in my notes, they'd produce their videotape, and we would get everything cleared up right away. I stand behind my story, but if I was wrong, Newsmax would have published a retraction and that would have been the end of it.

Now, after everyone's memory has faded, my notes have been taken to some landfill and there has been plenty of time to doctor the videos and the websites, the Obama campaign tries to deny he was there? They could have nipped this little problem in the bud if Obama really was not there, and they had chosen to speak up.

I think they are relying on the fact that people have fading memories about who gave the sermon in the early morning and who gave it in the evening, on a Sunday eight months ago.

And Freepers are coming up with evidence.

Your story is not adding up well. The schedule from July 22 shows that Wright was to give the Sermon at 6:00 PM and some other guy at 7:30 AM.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1986607/posts?page=334#334

And Jim baby - no true journalist sends their notes to a landfill. True journalists are packrats with their notes, especially working on a story that may catch fire later.

[XemaSab]

1. Which is where they belong.

His masters are going to be very angry.

[KittyWampus]

20. along with the professed claims of integrity from many DU Hillary supporters

[papau]

2. 3 hour flight to Chicago means a 6 pm sermon was easy to get to from a noon Miami meeting

[tammywammy]

3. Glad to see you're still sticking with Jim Davis on this

Good to know you'd rather take a Freeper's word over a democrat.

[papau]

12. plausible until proven otherwise

[tammywammy]

23. Whatever

You'd rather believe a Freeper and Newsmax over a democrat.

[papau]

41. Of course not - but I think Obama understands the weakness of the I never heard defense and tomorrow

speech is doing different cultures see things differently - and Wright as child of the 60's while he is of the more calm 80's.

[Johnny__Motown]

8. Ah yes, I am sure Barack Hussein Obama just flies through airport security nowadays

no problem


no problem at all

[SunsetDreams]

16. ....

OMG

didn't you know he was the new version of the road runner?:rofl:

MEEP MEEP!

[Arugula Latte]

27. He uses his ACME Metal Detector Vaporizor

MEEP MEEP!

[WillYourVoteBCounted]

28. LOL

thank you, humor much needed around here.

[SunsetDreams]

34. lololololol

Then he instantly turned into Captain Caveman and put people to sleep, so they wouldn't know he was on the plane.

[papau]

24. I am not saying it is true - just that it is not disproven - indeed its not important as to

issue of not knowing until last week about sermons -

DVD's are for sale in the church every week - plus he is talking to him on non-church days.

Plus if Oprah knew what was Weight's them from her attendence, I would think Obama would also know

but the idea of saying you just happen to miss all those nasty sermons- well I am glad he is dropping that approach to explaining this away for tomorrows speech - going with different cultures see things differently - and Wright as child of the 60's while he is of the more calm 80's.

[DearAbby]

48. Of course papau

We live in a country where you are guilty until proven innocent! SEIG HEIL!

[blogslut]

53. Your analogy is awful

I am one year older than Obama and there is no way in the world I would be considered a "child of the 80's". The same goes for Wright in reference to the 60's. Wright was a grown man during the 1960's.

Find a better analogy because that one just doesn't make sense.

[last1standing]

10. After six years here you want to ruin all your credibility on this?

Are you really going to stick by a freeper - yes, a literal freeper - just for the chance to slander a Democrat? Papau, please think twice about this before you continue. It's just not worth it.

[papau]

14. I am not "sticking with him - just noting as "Mythbusters" would say - not proven either way

[last1standing]

22. Um...OK. You do what you feel you need to do.

I just can't stand to see a good DUer go down like this.

[papau]

26. I think Obama understands the weakness of the I never heard defense and tomorrow is

doing different cultures see things differently - and Wright as child of the 60's while he is of the more calm 80's.

[DearAbby]

51. It is up to those accused to proved their own Innocence?

Did I fall asleep and the constitution was abolished? Obama had provided evidence to show he was not there, those who accused him claim they dont have the evidence anymore....just some chopped up video they purchased from the church website.

Sounds to me like a manufactured case, smear campaign. One Rove, I am sure is proud of. And you my friend fell for it.

[Forkboy]

21. I don't know what's making you so stupid on this, but it's working.

[GhostofSandpiper]

4. I'm glad no Democrats fell for this Right Wing slander

Oh wait...

Nevermind.

[ampad]

29. No you were right the first time

Democrats did not fall for this crap. Those who did fall for it: well call them what you will. The information did come from NewsMaxs so like I said call them what you will.

[NanceGreggs]

5. "Lost in a landfill" ....

... the 21st Century version of "my dog ate my homework".

[GhostofSandpiper]

7. Even Freepers are calling this chump on his crap

His strongest defenders?


Clinton Democrats.

[SunsetDreams]

13. ...

:rofl:

[Tarheel_Dem]

30. good one Nance....trust you (the writer) to always put things in their

proper perspective. :hi: :rofl: :applause: :yourock:

I think Jim Davis is about to get the Dan Rather treatment, and that only helps Obama. :bounce:

[papau]

32. I agree - but dump on Davis is wrong approach - better is the plan for speech of

saying different cultures see things differently - and Wright is child of the 60's while he is of the more calm 80's.

[myrna minx]

55. What journalist worth their weight in salt would toss out their notes?

Oh, that's right, a freeper writing for newsmax.

[gabeana]

6. This won't be enough for our Hillary supporters

I'm sure one of them will post something from newsmax in the near future
+ they probably believe this Davis "Journalist"

[BuyingThyme]

9. Newsmax would have printed a retraction!

:rofl:

[rodeodance]

11. Take your crap to another site.!!

[tammywammy]

25. You don't understand mocking?

[rodeodance]

15. So, another obamafolk bringing RW crap here. After Hillary folk got dissed. Double standard

[Forkboy]

18. The difference, not that you're bright enough to get it, is that this OP mocks them.

Whereas you cheer them.

Double standard? Yes...from you.

[papau]

31. the landfill claim is as likely as the I never heard claim - I keep notes for 20 years for no good

reason.

but dumping in Davis and sticking to I never heard is not the way to go - and O think Obana knows this and that is the reason tomorrows speech is going with different cultures see things differently - and Wright as child of the 60's while he is of the more calm 80's.

[Forkboy]

35. yeah great. Has zippo to do with my reply to rodeo.

:eyes:

[papau]

40. LOL - sorry - I forgot who I was posting a comment to

[rodeodance]

33. OP is bringing FR here . I get that . Don't lecture me after the shit you all are

dishing out today.

[tammywammy]

36. What you're failing to understand

It's okay to bring it over if your intent is to MOCK. This thread is for mocking FR.

You can't bring it over and applaud and cheer FR.

[Forkboy]

38. I told her she wouldn't be bright enough and she proved me right.

:)

[Forkboy]

37. And yet you liked the Newsmax stories. Save the outrage hypocrite.

[Tarheel_Dem]

39. omg...is that rodeo?

she'll go down with SS Clinton, if it kills her.

[Arugula Latte]

42. OMG -- Are you really this dense? Or are you just pretending?

You seriously don't understand the difference between posting something from FR to MOCK it and posting something from a rightwing source to CITE it?
:spray: :rofl: :spray: :rofl: :spray: :rofl:

[americanstranger]

43. Please STOP THE NAMECALLING!!!!1!!1!!one!

(Just predicting what RD's next post is going to be. I got that once for calleing him/her 'dense.')

- as

[Horse with no Name]

17. If it isn't TOO MUCH trouble

while they are in the landfill looking...if they might see if they can't find Bush's TANG records.

[Forkboy]

19. Bada boom!

:rofl:

[RamboLiberal]

47. Bada Bing!

:rofl: Good one!

[Jed Dilligan]

44. Jim Davis is a freeper!!?

http://www.garfield.com/

[tammywammy]

46. Hello, Odie is totally a Freeper

[MidwestTransplant]

45. Hey if it's good enough for Bill Kristol, it's good enough for me.

[Tatiana]

49. Anyone that agrees with or supports Jim Davis isn't a friend of Democrats. n/t

[blogslut]

50. Saw that earlier

He also says it's Obama's fault his story was bogus because the campaign did not correct him before the piece went online.

[better tomorrow]

52. gee, I thought they were with Hillary's tax returns.....

[BlueStater]

54. Jim Davis? Wasn't he that guy who created "Garfield"? n/t

[NorthernSpy]

56. ROTFLMAO!!!

:rofl:


Clown. He must think we're fools.