Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The only thing I did not like about the speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:16 PM
Original message
The only thing I did not like about the speech
In general I thought it was a very good speech. I doubt that it will change many minds. What it will do is help to get the campaign some positive spin with the MSM. This is politicking 101 of damage control. The one major flaw in the whole speech came when Obama directly contradicted his previous statement that he was not in church when the good Rev's inflamatory remarks were made. This is a major flip flop and one on which I am sure he will be called to account for later on. I personally thought that it was idiotic of him to have made the denial in the first place, because it would be too easy to prove that he was in the church when these statements were made. This was an amateurish mistake as it was for the campaign not to have recognized this issue and diffused it a long time ago instead of pretending that it did not exist. Time will only tell whether it overshadows the message. I hope not, because the matter of race does not belong in any political campaign. It is issues that matter and I sincerely wish we could get back to the examination and evaluation of each candidates qualifications and policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. He did not lie or contradict
What he said on Friday was that he was not present for the particular sermons in question. He never said that he had NEVER heard his pastor say anything controversial. I have been trying to point it out for days...I am glad he finally made that distinction today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Amen! He KNEW Wright was controversial, just not THIS controversial
I can forgive him for not being familiar with every single sermon the man gave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Delete -- dupe
Edited on Tue Mar-18-08 02:25 PM by LSparkle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not true.
He did not say he was in church when THOSE SPECIFIC remarks were made. He said he has been in the church on occasion when he heard SOME unspecified divisive remarks made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. He didn't contradict himself.
There's a difference between saying something controversial and saying something inflammatory. Obama said the same thing in the interview he gave on Olbermann's show Friday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. You're parsing
The implications of his words were clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. He said he was in church when controversial remarks were made
Remarks can be controversial without being inflammatory. The Rev was not always preaching inflammatoraly - his 911 remarks were a special case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC