Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Death of an American Cynic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
shallowthroat Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:39 PM
Original message
The Death of an American Cynic
I don't post on DU much but read often. I wanted to share this email I sent out to all my friends and family. I normally suffer politics in quiet despeation, but Obama challenged my apathy yesterday.

Also, please, Obama and Hillary supporters: quite the hate! You're on the same side.

Here's the email:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe7wTVbLUU&eurl=http://pol.moveon.org/obamaspeech/?id=12333-6311050-38wvzT&t=545


Please take some time to watch this entire video. Be prepared as its 37+ minutes long. I also realize some of you have already watched it in full.

All of you understand my deep distrust of the usual suspects in our government: the corporate-packaged politicians with their pearly teeth, practiced handshakes, and pretentious smiles. Their sharp, starched suits, and ingratiating flag lapel pins. And of course the hackneyed rhetoric that passes for patriotism. Yes, this is known all too well by my friends and family. Thinking of this, I really should thank all of you who have suffered my conversations on this topic with patience and politesse. It’s understood that you’ve all made long allowances for my political diatribes and controversial theories in the past. I know it can’t be easy listening to my wild speculations and pessimistic predictions all the time.

But I ask that you indulge me once more. Please, please watch the video in full.

Initially only Dennis Kucinich, John Edwards, and Ron Paul appealed to me - due mostly to their populist rhetoric but also to their defense and understanding of the Constitution. I’ll come to Obama soon. None of them seemed outstanding candidates but I was hoping they would do well during the primary (the lesser of 2 evils strategy we all hesitantly adopt). Sadly, the MSM (Mainstream Media for the layman) easily moved these figures to the fringe by noticeably ignoring them during debates, omitting them during Sunday talk shows, and surrogating the substance of their words at every turn with stories about their haircuts (see Edwards) or UFOs (see Kucinich). Yet, I have come to expect this as a common MSM protocol. During the course of the Democratic presidential race I saw so much Clinton and Obama to convince me that the MSM was again choosing our candidates for us. The aforementioned strategies of selection convinced me of Obama’s complicity in the machinery of Beltway politics. I found it hard to believe that our political system could ever introduce any real change (despite my acknowledgement that Obama’s campaign is one of the greatest examples of grassroots politics in history).

Kucinich, as much as I espouse his ideals, unfortunately lacks the charisma and stature to convince enough of the electorate he’s a viable candidate. Clinton and Edwards inclusion as leading members of the corporate-pandering DLC leaves questions of integrity that loom hauntingly over their motivations, and Paul has sadly exhibited philosophies that speak to the baser instincts of racism and bigotry.

Admittedly, I have not strongly gravitated towards any contemporary politician in my lifetime. Paul Wellstone and Russ Feingold were the closest to claiming my devotion and loyalty, but realistically they are all too easily discounted from the Executive Office because of socialist memes, genetic or cultural heritage, etc. Significant leaders, the prominent ones that honestly seek change and refuse to sell-out to the establishment, generally have been silenced through murder, censorship, or libel. I have read about FDR and the New Deal; Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler; the Kennedy Brothers; Martin Luther King and the Poor People’s Campaign; Wellstone and the promises of grassroots politics.

At a time when we look to our government for guidance and hope, during these fearful years of uncertainty and turmoil, most of us find a terrifying vacuum in Washington where morality, compassion, and intellect are wanting. The fact that this notable lack of leadership is glaring in both major parties is a serious and somber testament on the state of our body politic. That ‘body’ has definitely withered from apathy for many, many years and desperately needs a leader to guide its future movement and mores. Alas, we certainly don’t find any viable presidential candidates like JFK, FDR, MLK, or RFK within the Beltway today. Actually, it’s been decades. Well, at least I thought so… until yesterday.

The MSM will certainly claim Obama’s speech in Philadelphia was merely a collection of platitudes. Or that it was simply politically expedient for him to deliver this speech on race because of his controversial minister. They will undoubtedly and decidedly miss the point like they have on Iraq, on the economy, on torture, on domestic surveillance, and the long litany of encroachments upon the Constitution not only by Bush and the GOP, but by many Democrats as well. The machinations of the MSM are predictable and are well illustrated by the tedious coverage of Obama’s relationship to Wright and the vacuous coverage of McCain’s relationship with Hagee. Liberal Media indeed.

Again the MSM will take the low road and intentionally cover this speech only by it’s immediate worth to Obama’s presidential bid. They will dissect its meaning only in terms of its implications to his campaign’s livelihood rather than in terms of it’s implications of his character, courage, and consequently, his presidential credentials. Their hope is to nullify the import and impact of this speech; to cause distraction and dissatisfaction with this candidate; to imperil this campaign and to divide and conquer as usual. But please heed Obama’s words: “Not this time”.

This speech exemplifies all that we need at this moment in history; nay, at any moment in history: honesty, clarity, and leadership. It speaks frankly about a realization and fresh perspective of the past, one that is absolutely necessary to fulfill any hopes we may have for the future. It conveys a willingness to acknowledge fault across the board and to elucidate social complexities that usually escape everyday experience. His ability to finesse these issues with such force of rhetoric while still retaining hope and understanding is truly impressive. It should be noted that it would have been easy for him to sacrifice his long-standing alliances. Yet he spared everyone all the while shredding apart the notion of guilt-by-association. This is something truly unique in today’s political discourse; especially for a Democrat.

I have not heard any other contemporary presidential candidate in the past 40 years able to communicate the subtleties of the American experience as well as Obama or to expound upon our social nuances with such damning transparency. I have never, ever experienced a speech that so closely echoes the monologue of my heart. His words are not mere demagoguery, for such speech is only a guise of hope and is really couched in prejudice and exclusion. I found nothing in Obama’s words that were mendacious. Actually he mouthed candid truths at great risk to his reputation. That is not demagoguery.

Amazingly and unexpectedly, Obama has arrested my inexorable cynicism. I am feeling a change in myself regarding politics that is both unfamiliar and most welcome: hope. His words have impelled me to write to all of you about my change of heart. It is a step that is both cathartic and long overdue for me. And it is something I can no longer ignore. I hope you all feel the same after watching the video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Be still, my heart! What a wonderful post, and welcome to the club, and DU!
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 05:44 PM by babylonsister
:toast: Do you mind me asking if you've received any responses yet? That is one great e-mail, and you sound so sincere and earnest, how could your friends not respond? Many thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, all I can usefully add is ...
:applause: :patriot: :applause:



And welcome to the DU discussion!

:kick: and REC'D!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you so much for sharing. It's great to read stuff like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. thank you, "shallow throat"- LOL.
There's nothing shallow about your post. You made me think of my neighbor, a very intelligent guy, who won't vote. He told me today that he'd read the text of Obama's speech, and I didn't pursue it. His wife, on the other hand, is a a Republican who is very excited about Obama and will vote for him if he's the nominee (she told me she wouldn't vote for Hillary).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Shallowthroat, welcome
to the hope in your heart.

Thank you for your post, it's very heart-felt and beautiful.

:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. A WOW and a welcome, shallowthroat.
I loved reading what you had to say.

:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. WOW! I wish you would share your thoughts more often.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Still a cynic over here....
"If Barack gets past the primary, he might have to publicly distance himself from me," Mr. Wright said with a shrug. "I said it to Barack personally, and he said yeah, that might have to happen."

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/us/politics/30obama.html?_r=2&pagewanted=3&sq=Jeremiah%20%20wright&st=nyt&scp=4&oref=slogin

I'm glad that he made the speech. It was an important one. I'll even agree that it was a very "presidential" speech. But I don't for a minute believe that he did it for anything other than political motivations.

And that is the difference between Obama and MLK in my mind. MLK wanted to change his country. Obama wants to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shallowthroat Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. I don't blame you much...
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 07:23 PM by shallowthroat
Well, MLK was not running for president though it was rumored he may run on a ticket with Benjamin Spock as his VP in 1968.

MLK certainly wanted to change this country. You don't suffer the wrath of the American Govt if you lack conviction. And you definitely don't pay the ultimate price if you don't agree with the worth of the cause.

Obama is certainly motivated to win. You don't run for POTUS to lose.

I am convinced, with trepidation, not just because of the content of his speech, but also the overtones of the delivery. Pardon the pun, but everything is not black and white. Too often issues are analyzed in absolutes rather than relativity. This principle was a guiding influence in his attempt to explain the diatribes of his minister; the epithets of his grandmother; and his refusal to forsake them.

And it is this philosophy, one dismissing absolutes, that I've been ruminating for some time now. Remember Clerks where they discuss the destruction of the Death Star and the morality of killing all of the innocent contractors building it? Most subjects of contention generally have 2 sides arguing about a multifaceted issue. It's like qualifying a cube while describing a square.

Dishonesty rarely finds quarter in such complexities. It doesn't' mean it can't. I just feel it doesn't take much to be dishonest; it takes a lot more to tell the truth. And in the end, Obama uttered the truth on this subject better than anyone since MLK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow, I am a naive optimist, and welcome to our side...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R!
Welcome and well-said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdog Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Great post!
It's funny but you remind me of someone who used to ask Americans to be more cynical. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. OK, I have a question...
Who the hell looks to government for guidance and hope? Seriously, we HIRE these assholes for a job, not to give us inspiration, we are supposed to be inspired by OURSELVES, not by others, that only leads to disappointment and apathy. Especially when you put faith in politicians, who seem to have being assholes written on their resumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shallowthroat Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Not government politicians but in government design
Democracy, or our constitutional government - republic.

I assure you that even corrupt politicians are inspired by THEMSELVES, not by others.

I agree with the sentiment of your argument, just not the context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. "corrupt politician", isn't that redundant? ;)
As far as our government design, I have problems with it, mostly in the House, where the first past the post districting system is leading to a less and less representative House of Representatives. With each passing year, because of some institutional conservative and traditions, we are finding that we are being further removed from our Representatives year after year. Right now there are about 1 Representative for every 600 thousand people, in the future, this ratio will only increase, to 700 thousand, a million, etc. At some point, if it hasn't happened already, we'll be as removed from our Representatives as we are of our Senators, or indeed President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shallowthroat Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well, cliche maybe
I agree. Our government is not perfect and Obama used that the central theme of his speech. The problem is it takes us electing the right people into office to fix these institutional problems. Of course, the right people have to be allowed to run too.

One thing I have a problem with: lifetime terms for APPOINTED officials, see the US Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. The problem, as I see it, is that there are no right people for the job...
certainly not the two people we have running in the Democratic Presidential Primary. Both are, at best, status quo candidates, who may give up some of the power Bush has consolidated in the Executive branch, but they wouldn't do much more than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shallowthroat Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. If they don't....
then I know I've been fooled. I would hope Obama does, but I'm less sold on Hillary.

You are absolutely right on that point and a poignant question that SHOULD be asked of all the candidates!!

Very good Solon. I've thought of this too but suddenly thought "Why are all candidate not asked this question?"

However, I don't believe it's only due to the fact that the candidates won't (again, I think Obama may if he's for real) but they don't even want to start asking questions like that. The question is framed in a way that basically acknowledges the impropriety, and illegality of those extra-executive powers gained over the past 7 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. The only two candidates I think were real in the primary were Kucinich and Gravel...
And I agreed more with Kucinich than Gravel, so I supported him for the primary. The only other genuine candidate in this race was Ron Paul, but he's fucking nuts, so I couldn't support him. Other than them, all the rest, both Democratic and Republican, are, more or less, assholes who will do and say anything to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. K/R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Keep those cards 'n letters
comin'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R Couldn't agree more!...
:kick: Welcome -- glad you broke your habit and dropped in! Loved reading that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psst_Im_Not_Here Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. You'll have to update us
on the responses you get from your friends and family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick_of_Rethuggery Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. May be you could turn this into an ad? (moveon.org contest)
Moveon.org is holding a 30-second ad contest...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC