Since Gore, Edwards, and Richardson haven't endorsed Obama yet...
MethuenProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:36 AM
Original message
Since Gore, Edwards, and Richardson haven't endorsed Obama yet...
... what does that say about their confidence in Obama? What do they know that Kerry and Kennedy don't know?
democrattotheend
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. They haven't endorsed Clinton yet either
So you could make that same argument for her. At least for Richardson, I think it's a case of divided loyalties...he has hinted that he wants to endorse Obama but feels like he owes the Clintons.
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. exactly - and Gore had plenty of HRC contact in the 1990s
joeybee12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. It means they're not going to...probably...the time to jump on the Obama
bandwagon has passed since apparently people are experiencing Buyer's Remorse.
gemdem
(975 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. These men haven't endorsed HRC either...
...so, what do Kerry and Kennedy know that Gore, Edward, and Richardson don't know? :eyes:
sellitman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. I hope you didn't stay home from work thinking that one up.
And just why wouldn't that work in reverse? :eyes:
SKKY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. It says nothing. It also says nothing that they haven't endorsed HRC either...
...What about all those supers that haven't pledged for a candidate. What does that say? I'm not sure I understand the point of your post. :shrug:
azmouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Nice try but no cigar.
It means exactly nothing.
MethuenProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. The endorsements of Gore, Edwards, and Richardson mean "nothing"?
azmouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Nice try misinterpreting what I wrote.
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think it speaks volumes
that Gore hasn't endorsed Hillary. I may still eat my words, but I think his silence is pointed.
MethuenProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wait, all you DUbama's think they might endorse Clinton???
Wow. That's going against the talking points, isn't it?
KaryninMiami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe they are waiting to endorse--- the PARTY --- which is what is needed most of all now.
That goes for the super delegates as well who have not yet made their endorsements known- they are also waiting to see where their endorsements will be most needed and waiting to see the will of the voters and making sure that regardess of the nominee, we beat McCain.
EmperorHasNoClothes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Since so many superdelegates have switched from Hillary to Obama...
... what does that say about their confidence in Hillary?
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. It shows they go with the political winds. They can always switch back
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Mar-20-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why have more Senators enodorsed Obama than Clinton?
Why have more Govenors endorsed Obama than Clinton This makes you wonder especially since they have known the Clintons so long and the Clintons have had decades to build up those personal relationships. And then there is the curious case of the Senator that knows Clinton the best. Senator Boxer's family is intermarried with the Rodham's and has given her a pro forma endorsement saying only that she will vote for her at the Convention but refuses to publically endorse her and refuses to assist the campaign in any way. And what makes this really interesting is that Boxer has a very safe seat and is working actively to help elect other democrats all of the time - I get one email a week from her PAC. So what does Barbara Boxer know?
gemdem
(975 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. Richardson is endorsing Obama today
Describes him as "a once-in-a-lifetime leader." I guess that says plenty about his confidence in Obama. :-)
Nine
(472 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. It shows they know this isn't "over."
To all of you asking why isn't the reverse applicable - it's because Hillary and her supporters aren't claiming this is all "over," as Obama supporters are.
bunnies
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
So about that Richardson endorsement. How much does your guys opinion mean to you?
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. LOL. Wooooops! Richardson Endorses Obama! GOBAMA!
slinkerwink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
21. well, Richardson just endorsed Obama. Thanks for your "concern"
susankh4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. They have been told to STFU
and they will be told when, and whom to endorse. The cult has taken over the party.
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. If you believe what you just wrote
please get help. It's literally insane to believe what you wrote.
Rosa Luxemburg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
24. 1 down 2 to go! ha ha
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Kick for your reply to the snarky OP!
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
25. Well, Richardson endorsed Obama.
Maine-ah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
27. so, exactly how do you feel about Richardson endorsing Obama?
inquiring minds want to know......
MethuenProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I think Richardson is still more qualified for the job than BO is.
Those of us who cared about ending the Iraq War backed Richardson. Those impressed with other things backed Obama and Clinton. Clinton is my default candidate, because I want to beat McCain in Novmber.
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. So you're only supporting Clinton because of electability?
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
Johnny__Motown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
29. Richardson endorsing Obama in about 2 hours,, Gore and Edwards playing "elder statesmen" and will
democrattotheend
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
30. Better change the title
And I don't expect Gore to endorse anyone. If he were going to endorse Clinton he certainly would have done it by now.
lojasmo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
31. Oops. Sort of jumped the shark there, buddy. EOM
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri Mar-21-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.