Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Since Gore, Edwards, and Richardson haven't endorsed Obama yet...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:36 AM
Original message
Since Gore, Edwards, and Richardson haven't endorsed Obama yet...
... what does that say about their confidence in Obama?
What do they know that Kerry and Kennedy don't know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. They haven't endorsed Clinton yet either
So you could make that same argument for her.

At least for Richardson, I think it's a case of divided loyalties...he has hinted that he wants to endorse Obama but feels like he owes the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. exactly - and Gore had plenty of HRC contact in the 1990s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. It means they're not going to...probably...the time to jump on the Obama
bandwagon has passed since apparently people are experiencing Buyer's Remorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gemdem Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. These men haven't endorsed HRC either...
...so, what do Kerry and Kennedy know that Gore, Edward, and Richardson don't know?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. I hope you didn't stay home from work thinking that one up.
And just why wouldn't that work in reverse?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. It says nothing. It also says nothing that they haven't endorsed HRC either...
...What about all those supers that haven't pledged for a candidate. What does that say? I'm not sure I understand the point of your post. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Nice try but no cigar.
It means exactly nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. The endorsements of Gore, Edwards, and Richardson mean "nothing"?
Yeah. Ok...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Nice try misinterpreting what I wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think it speaks volumes
that Gore hasn't endorsed Hillary.

I may still eat my words, but I think his silence is pointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wait, all you DUbama's think they might endorse Clinton???
Wow. That's going against the talking points, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe they are waiting to endorse--- the PARTY --- which is what is needed most of all now.
That goes for the super delegates as well who have not yet made their endorsements known- they are also waiting to see where their endorsements will be most needed and waiting to see the will of the voters and making sure that regardess of the nominee, we beat McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Since so many superdelegates have switched from Hillary to Obama...
... what does that say about their confidence in Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. It shows they go with the political winds. They can always switch back
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. No premature
endorsementitis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why have more Senators enodorsed Obama than Clinton?
Why have more Govenors endorsed Obama than Clinton


This makes you wonder especially since they have known the Clintons so long and the Clintons have had decades to build up those personal relationships.



And then there is the curious case of the Senator that knows Clinton the best. Senator Boxer's family is intermarried with the Rodham's and has given her a pro forma endorsement saying only that she will vote for her at the Convention but refuses to publically endorse her and refuses to assist the campaign in any way.

And what makes this really interesting is that Boxer has a very safe seat and is working actively to help elect other democrats all of the time - I get one email a week from her PAC. So what does Barbara Boxer know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gemdem Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. Richardson is endorsing Obama today
Describes him as "a once-in-a-lifetime leader." I guess that says plenty about his confidence in Obama. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nine Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. It shows they know this isn't "over."
To all of you asking why isn't the reverse applicable - it's because Hillary and her supporters aren't claiming this is all "over," as Obama supporters are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
19. *giggle*
So about that Richardson endorsement. How much does your guys opinion mean to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. LOL. Wooooops! Richardson Endorses Obama! GOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
21. well, Richardson just endorsed Obama. Thanks for your "concern"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. They have been told to STFU
and they will be told when, and whom to endorse.

The cult has taken over the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. If you believe what you just wrote
please get help. It's literally insane to believe what you wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
24. 1 down 2 to go! ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Kick for your reply to the snarky OP!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
25. Well, Richardson endorsed Obama.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
27. so, exactly how do you feel about Richardson endorsing Obama?
inquiring minds want to know......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I think Richardson is still more qualified for the job than BO is.
Those of us who cared about ending the Iraq War backed Richardson.
Those impressed with other things backed Obama and Clinton.
Clinton is my default candidate, because I want to beat McCain in Novmber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. So you're only supporting Clinton because of electability?
Interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
28. Nanny, nanny bo bo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
29. Richardson endorsing Obama in about 2 hours,, Gore and Edwards playing "elder statesmen" and will
endorse n June.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
30. Better change the title
And I don't expect Gore to endorse anyone. If he were going to endorse Clinton he certainly would have done it by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
31. Oops. Sort of jumped the shark there, buddy. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
33. Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC