Help please! Is it true that Hillary has released her 2000-06 tax returns? Supporter says YES!!

[Melinda]

And I can't find them anywhere. :(

On this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5173922

the OP claims she has released 6 years worth. Now to be fair, he doesn't say they are for the years 2000-06, but he implies they are when he says she has released "6 years of tax returns into the public domain".

Any and all help appreciated, thanks!

[John Q. Citizen]

1. Not unless she did it ten minutes ago.

[Melinda]

6. Google is faster than that, no?

Well, it must be any minute then!! Thanks!

[stray cat]

2. Not since yesterday

[silverweb]

3. Ask the OP to substantiate the claim.

The burden of proof is on the person who makes an assertion.

Either the OP ponies up with some documentation or is a liar. Don't waste your time searching for something that doesn't exist.

[Melinda]

8. Asked three times, one of them in ALL CAPS... he doesn't respond.

I feel like the victim of a hit and run. :(





Okay, not really, but you know what I mean. ;)

[silverweb]

20. That proves my point.

He's a liar.

By the way, that OP is already on my ignore list, obviously for good reason. ;)

[truebrit71]

4. No. She has not. That supporter is incorrect...

She is STILL hiding them...

[Melinda]

10. Brits are so well-mannered. =)

Here is the states we just call people who make assertions without evidence... liars. ;)

[truebrit71]

19. LOL!!! You should have seen what I initially had typed...!!

:rofl:

Nothing much well-mannered about it I can assure you~!

[Melinda]

26. Hehe, you could always pm it to me =)

But, I do appreciate self-restraint. I'm trying to be good as well! :toast:

[truebrit71]

31. It was something along the lines of....

...."massive lying sack of shit"....

:evilgrin:

[Name removed]

5. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Melinda]

15. To be fair, maybe a few do, but most *liars* claiming to support her are actually disruptors...

Or at least "I" think so. ;)

[papau]

7. not yet - they are promised before 4/15 and will - unlike Obama - be whole return - not a

trust me summary like Obama has released (along with a copy of the page he signed).

[anigbrowl]

12. Yet another lie...Obama's WHOLE tax return is easy to get through Google

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/files/obama_2006_tax_return.pdf

22 pages of it.

[Melinda]

16. Now papau, I know you to be a long time and fair minded DUer... and I appreciate your response to my

question, but what you stated about Obama's return is just flat wrong.

Question for you... why must SOME supporters of both candidates be so fucking smarmy? Frankly I am a wee bit surprised by some of the elder members of DU acting this way (and I am not calling you out by any means).

But seriously, I understand your passion, but I don't get the rest. Did you really believe that Obama's full return was not made public?

Just trying to understand... perhaps there is no sense to be made.

Hell I survived the Dean wars and don't ever recall the vitriol that is now.

Of course I don't recall that we were invaded by so many trolls and disruptor's either.

Anyway, thanks for answering my 1st question, and know I respect your support for Hillary. :)

[Buzz Clik]

28. You were proven wrong in your claim. And your retraction? Not coming?

[anigbrowl]

9. Nope. If it was true the OP would have supplied a link.

I suspect what that OP means is that some of the her tax records became public during Starr's investigation.

[Melinda]

17. So you think the OP was confused?

I'm trying to give him the benefit of the doubt here.

[blogslut]

25. I think that poster is referring to the 1990's

n/t

[DJ13]

11. Senators release a summary yearly

But those summaries have no detail of who paid them what (Bill's deals), just income and taxes paid amounts.

The summaries arent actual tax records, they are just Senate reporting instruments to cover their asses.

[Melinda]

18. Thanks for that information, but he did claim "Tax Returns"

I'm no Pollyanna, but I'm beginning to think that poster is intentionally misrepresenting the facts of the matter. And still no response from him to any of my queries. :(

Thanks again. :hi:

[Bonobo]

13. Give up on talking to that person. You will find no satisfaction.

[Melinda]

27. Advice taken; that was my first and last attempt at discussion w/him.

Thanks. :)

[SoonerPride]

14. Confusing 6 years of first lady records, not tax records

The op is wrong.

No wonder........................ it is someone on my ignore list.

[Melinda]

29. That makes sense... Confusion runs rampant on DU lately!!

Thanks for your reply.. I've never interacted with that one before, never really noticed him either. I bow to your wisdom... ignore is a good thing!! :hi:

[blogslut]

21. She has not released her 2006 tax returns

n/t

[Melinda]

30. O/T but I love your Obama gif!! Anyway, nor her 2000-05 returns either...

at least afaik... wish the OP would provide a link. ;)

[blogslut]

32. Thanks

I made it wiff my own two hands and you know, software. :)

[Coexist]

22. No, not any tax returns.

[mmonk]

23. Have you seen it in the media yet? If not, the answer is no.

[better tomorrow]

24. maybe so but there will be pages missing just like in her public records I am certain...