Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Splitting the MI/FL Delegates 50-50 Gaining Support?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Khaotic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:12 PM
Original message
Splitting the MI/FL Delegates 50-50 Gaining Support?
At least it looks that way for MI:

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Michigan_doover_vote_looks_unlikely_after_0320.html

Could be the best way to go for FL as well.

I personally think it would be the best way to go since the earlier contents in MI/FL were impacted by the voter turnout being so low because the delegates weren't going to count.



Here's a run down of all the different versions. As you can see, Hillary would probably fair best from using the results of the earlier primaries. I suspect her campaign won't let that die.

The graphs below were created on March 14 and don't reflect the delegates gained by Obama in Iowa's county conventions.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
galactical Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. HIllary won't take.
She shot it down along with some stuff about "people...not numbers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't think it matters whether she wants it.
There isn't going to be a revote in either state, and she can at least compete for the supers this way.

The delegates do need to be seated, and this seems to be the most obvious way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. In all honesty, what is the point of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am in favor of not seating them at all.
My next favorable option is FL(half or whole) and MI 50/50.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. this is not a good idea
The Michigan Democrats are already pissed. Let's not whip them into a frenzy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Some are going to be pissed, no matter what, at this point.
The Democrats in MI need to throw their state officials to the curb for screwing them. It can't be "undone" now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Right, but this would be really rubbing it in their faces.
Seat them somehow. I mean, come on.

We need Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I hope the DNC, Clinton, Obama and MI
can agree to something, and FAST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. /signed
An agreement must be reached, and both of our candidates need to offer some real benefits to Michigan.

Somebody suggested some wind energy plants, things like that. Anything of that sort needs to be offered as part of an overarching proposal soon.

People in Michigan are hurting. Bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatsDogsBabies Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Could Michigan be 50/50
and Florida seated according to whatever the vote was, or something like that since both names were on the ballot in Florida? I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. sounds fine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clinton will Litigate
to the bitter end...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's Such A Stupid Suggestion In My Opinion. I Don't Know Why It's Even Taken Seriously.
What's the difference between that and not seating them at all? What's the point? The people still don't get a vote. Isn't is just completely useless of an exercise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeker30 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well thats one way for Obama to steal the nomination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Uh. That's the *OTHER* way around..
Since Obama is leading in popular votes, delegates, states won, polls, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. The other way is to win more votes, more delegates, more states
and get to 2024(or 2208 if FL&MI).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. God, I thought you asked about the MILF delegates
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC