Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is history repeating? Bush I's 1992 Passportgate smear campaign against Bill Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 07:38 PM
Original message
Is history repeating? Bush I's 1992 Passportgate smear campaign against Bill Clinton
and his mother.

With Bill Clinton leading in the polls in September 1992, an FBI investigation showed that George H.W. Bush sought to confirm far-out right wing rumors. The kook ultra fringe whispered that a youthful Clinton had sought to renounce his citizenship, and may have been a secret KGB agent!

Did Bush II seek passport data on Obama and his mother to smear the 2008 frontrunner?

As with both Bushes' irresistible urges to invade Iraq, is thiis another case of "Like father, like son"?

From http://www.consortiumnews.com/1999/100599a2.html :

"BUSH FAMILY POLITICS By Robert Parry -- October 5, 1999

The National Archives released the records from the so-called Passportgate affair in August in response to my Freedom of Information Act request. ... the documentary record now makes clear that Bush was the driving force behind this 'silver bullet' search. The Passportgate controversy began in mid-September 1992, with Clinton leading in the polls and Bushs brain trust pondering ways to exploit the Clinton "character" issue. White House chief of staff James Baker heard about press inquiries seeking government records on Clinton's anti-Vietnam War activities. Reporters from several news organizations, including the right-wing Washington Times, had filed FOIAs.

...rumors were floating around conservative circles that Clinton might have written a letter renouncing his citizenship during the war. Recognizing the damage these rumors could cause Clinton, Baker asked other administration officials about the status of the FOIA requests. Eventually, the high-level White House interest was communicated to State Department official Elizabeth Tamposi. Tamposi, a Bush political appointee, saw the White House interest as a green light to speed up the search and override concerns that expedited action could violate Clinton's privacy rights.

On the night of Sept. 30, Tamposi dispatched three aides to the federal records center in Suitland, Md. They searched Clinton's passport file as well as his mothers, presumably because they thought it might contain some references to Clinton.

The State Department team did not find the rumored renunciation letter. But Bush aides did not give up the hunt. Tamposi contacted the U.S. embassies in London and Oslo and ordered searches of consular files in those countries. Only the London embassy complied and found nothing. With little to show for their efforts, Bush officials next constructed a suspicion that a Clinton sympathizer might have tampered with the passport file and removed the supposed renunciation letter. They cited staple holes and a slight tear in the corner of Clinton's passport application to justify a criminal referral to the FBI. The existence of the referral was then leaked to Newsweek, which published a story on Oct. 4 with precisely the disloyalty spin that the Bush campaign had wanted. The Bush campaign then seized on the Newsweek story as an opportunity to raise more suspicions about what Clinton was up to when he made a student trip to Moscow over New Year's Day 1970. With these negative themes on the table, Clinton's loyalty became a hot campaign issue and Clinton's advisers nervously watched their poll numbers soften. The Bush camp upped the ante more, putting out new suspicions that Clinton might have been a KGB "agent of influence.""
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThatBozGuy Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Clinton Campaign group definitely learned the lessons of Bush 1
Edited on Thu Mar-20-08 07:54 PM by ThatBozGuy
Ms Clinton's political operatives have been running the same playbook that Mr Bush ran against Mr Clinton page for page against Mr Obama.

A study into these politics, would make a very interesting case of Stockholm Syndrome impacting the Clinton campaign. They are definitely taking on the views and and process of those that attacked them in the 90s and repeating them today.

Mr Obama 2008 campaign = Mr Clinton campaign 1992 Young hope against the political dynasty,
MS Clinton 2008 campaign = Mr Bush's campaign 1992 Experienced politically savy incumbent against young upstart candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It will be interesting to vet the resumes of the 3 "contract employees" for links to Bill
and Hillary, as well as links to Rove, Baker, and the rest of McCain's Brain Trust.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is there anything Bush does..
that Daddy didn't do first? There is no law they do not feel entitled to break. Too bad we don't have a Justice Department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Bushes may regard this kind of felony breach of privacy as just 'opposition research',
routine paperwork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC