Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Her statement is, to be precise, a lie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:28 AM
Original message
Her statement is, to be precise, a lie
<snip>
"When it comes to the essential test of the trade debate, Clinton has been identified as a liar -- a put-in-boldface-type "L-I-A-R" liar."

more here:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080320/cm_thenation/1300860
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. The latest Obama "unity" theme, Hillary lied!
All the usual water carriers echo in unison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What does John Nichols, the author of this opinion piece, have to do with any Obama campaign themes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. This post isnt needed or helpful.
But then again .....its time Hillary and her supporters realize that for the good of the party she exits the race. One of her best friends Gov. Richardson just dropped the biggest hint he could by supporting Obama. She needs to go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. According to you?
pffft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. No... According to one of her best friends.
Stop sticking your head in the sand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. it's not the sand they have their heads stuck in
on the plus side, they don't need expensive colonoscopies to see if there's a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. I disagree. Hillary is a liar, and it has to be said loud and clear.
If the same thing would have been done when Bush Jr lied, if someone who had access to getting their opinion widely circulated had said it clearly and often, we might have had a different outcome in 2000.

But, Hillary Clinton, Bush Jr's lies were so blatant and outrageous, the press was intimidated by the pure brazenness of it. So they tip-toed around the issue, or ignored it completely, hoping that the American public would get it on their own.

Well, not enough of voters got it with Bush the liar, and I don't think enough voters are yet getting it with Hillary the liar.

It needs to be said over and over again, each time she lies. Otherwise, we may end up with a future of nothing but GWB/HRC clones in the Oval Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenRob Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. So if Hillary is telling a lie in order to bash Obama he isn't supposed to point it out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. What lie?
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 09:45 AM by The_Casual_Observer
Obama is making up shit about NAFTA in order to cover his own stupid ass. Nobody but blog geeks are buying that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. For the link-using impaired -- from the article above
"....Now that we know from official records of her time as First Lady that Clinton was the featured speaker at a closed-door session where 120 women opinion leaders were hectored to pressure their congressional representatives to approve NAFTA; now that we know from ABC News reporting on the session that "her remarks were totally pro-NAFTA" and that "there was no equivocation for her support for NAFTA at the time;" now that we have these details confirmed, what should we make of Clinton's campaign claim that she was never comfortable with the militant free-trade agenda that has cost the United States hundreds of thousands of union jobs, that has idled entire industries, that has saddled this country with record trade deficits, undermined the security of working families in the US and abroad, and has forced Mexican farmers off their land into an economic refugee status that ultimately forces them to cross the Rio Grande River in search of work?

As she campaigns now, Clinton says, "I have been a critic of NAFTA from the very beginning."

But the White House records confirm that this is not true.

Her statement is, to be precise, a lie.

When it comes to the essential test of the trade debate, Clinton has been identified as a liar -- a put-in-boldface-type "L-I-A-R" liar.

Those of us who covered the 1993 NAFTA debate have frequently expressed doubts about the former First Lady's recent statements. We never heard anything at the time about her dissenting from the Clinton Administration line on trade policy. And we knew that she had defended NAFTA in the years following its enactment. But fairness required that we at least entertain that notion--promoted by the lamentable David Gergen, himself a champion of free-trade policies while working in the Clinton White House--that Hillary Clinton had been a behind-the-scenes critic. We had to at least consider the possibility that, at the very least, Clinton had been worried that advancing NAFTA would trip up her advocacy for health care reform, that she had made her concerns known and that she had absented herself from pro-NAFTA lobbying.

This was certainly the impression that Clinton and her supporters sought to create as she campaigned in Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Indiana--states where worried workers want to know exactly where the candidates have stood and currently stand with regard to trade issues.

But that impression was a deliberate deception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's pure hearsay. Get lost with that shit.
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 09:51 AM by The_Casual_Observer
The nation hasn't got shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hearsay? Try Eye Witness Corroboration
But you're right, The Nation is just a right-wing scandal sheet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Clinton's 1993 NAFTA Meeting - ABC News
<snip>
Two attendees of that closed-door briefing, neither of whom are affiliated with any campaign, describe that event for ABC News. It was a room full of women involved in international trade. David Gergen served as a sort of master of ceremonies as various women members of the Cabinet talked up NAFTA, which had yet to pass Congress.

"It wasn’t a drop-by it was organized around her participation," said one attendee. "Her remarks were totally pro-NAFTA and what a good thing it would be for the economy. There was no equivocation for her support for NAFTA at the time.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/03/clintons-1993-n.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Read down the thread
That "shit" is pretty hard to ignore. I'm one of the less partisan people hanging out in here, but really...a lie would appear to be a lie and nothing less in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I'll assume you haven't followed the link...
Hillary has repeatedly (and quite forcefully) said that she didn't not support NAFTA at the time and that she had doubts about it. Actual quote from a recent interview with the Indianapolis Star: "Actually I was opposed to it (NAFTA) and people like David Gergen, who is not a supporter or endorser of mine, has come forward to state clearly that I opposed NAFTA, spoke out against it inside the White House."

The newly-released White House records have her participating in at least five meetings for the purpose of convincing key business and congressional leaders that NAFTA should be approved.

She needs to explain this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Nichols isn't an "Obama" supporter or surrogate
... so much as a progressive journalist. And it is not surprising that a progressive journalist takes issue with Sen. Clinton's actual record, relative to the tale being spun during the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:41 PM
Original message
i noticed several subject lines with the Lie meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. That tends to happen when Sen. Clinton lies.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Didn't you know? It's a vast left-wing conspiracy that makes her lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. frickin propagandists at 'The Nation', spinning Hillary's false statements as lies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nels25 Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Hey if the truth is the truth!!
then you have to deal with it.

Reality sucks, does it not??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. a crique of her honesty is the POINT of a campaign, and has nothing to do with sowing disunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Funny how when The Nation is used for Obamabots it's fine
but if a Hillary supporter links to it they're villified.

What a pathetic load of spinneramic garbage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. WTF are you talking about?
Maybe I missed it, but I don't see people criticizing the fact that something comes from The Nation.

They might criticize the content of a certain article, but not The Nation as a source. The only ones who have criticized The Nation are generally the more conservative posters who say it is "too left wing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I believe mtnsnake has mistaken The Nation for The National Review? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. good guess. gotta wonder, otherwise. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. The Nation!!! My God, you just embarrassed yourself irredeemably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. What exactly is so heinous about 'The Nation'? Every progressive, if not liberal and Democrat ...
... should have a subscription.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. I think you are getting the Nation confused for Newsmax n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Couldn't be. The Hillarites love Newsmax. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
28. Clinton Gets Caught Again on NAFTA
David Sirota
Clinton Gets Caught Again on NAFTA

Posted February 24, 2008

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/clinton-gets...

(snip)

According to NBC's Meet the Press, in 2004, Clinton said, "I think, on balance, NAFTA has been good for New York and America."

In her memoir, Clinton trumpeted her husband's "successes on the budget, the Brady bill and NAFTA."

And in 1998, Bloomberg News reports that she praised corporations for mounting "a very effective business effort in the U.S. on behalf of NAFTA." Another direct quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
29. When all else fails, deny it. What do you expect from Mrs. NAFTA?
She was Bubba's biggest supporter back in the 90's, of course she endorsed NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. And now where is her apology for reaming Senator Obama in Ohio
for saying that she did support NAFTA. She reamed him and made a dramatic spectacle of herself.

Shame on Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC