Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richardson

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:34 PM
Original message
Richardson
regarding Bill Richardson's endorsement of Barack Obama. This is what he said on CNN on February 25 regarding the role of superdelegates:


Email
Print
Comments
Buzz up!on Yahoo!BLITZER: All right. So you say you will -- you're about to endorse somebody? You're thinking about endorsing either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama? Make the news. Go ahead.


RICHARDSON: Well, no. I'm going to decide very shortly. But the reality is I think there are too many superdelegates. There are over 800. That's the latest count that I saw.

BLITZER: There's almost 800.

RICHARDSON: Who elected these people? I think it's important that those...

BLITZER: Well, you're a superdelegate. You were elected by the people of New Mexico.

RICHARDSON: Well, that's right, but that doesn't mean that you appoint every big fundraiser, you appoint every governor, every member of Congress, every leader that contributes money.

I just think this should be decided by voters. And in my view, there are too many superdelegates. They have too much influence. I would cut down the number.

But I think superdelegates should vote
more....http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-hamsher/a-few-unanswered-question_b_92751.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like this Bill Richardson fellow.
How come we've never heard of him before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. He is a poor excuse for a democrat....
I saw him make those comments on CNN...it was offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sour grapes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. offensive that there are too many superdelegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. He's a life long friend of the Clintons. If he's as bad as you say, what does it say about them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You'd like him just fine if he endorsed Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. You know it! Bitter, bitter, bitter.
I guess Richardson is DEAD to Hillary supporters too.


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Why is it offensive to suggest there should be fewer superdelegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. You want a poor excuse for a dem?
Look elsewhere. Bill Richardson is, and has long been, a good dem. You know what I say when Hillary gets an endorsement? Either congrats or nothing at all. I don't trash the person endorsing her. Only shitbird dems do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. What's your point?
Endorsing someone doesn't mean he can't change his vote at the convention. He's exactly right, the voters should decide. I wish Hillary's supporters would agree, then maybe they would face the reality that she can't get enough votes to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC